9.09.2020

Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, Season Four


Welcome to my first-time-ever Deep Space Nine "rewatch." First up: season four. 

No you haven't missed a few posts, I'm just beginning with season four. I've tried numerous times with season one, going back all the way to the premiere episode of the show, which I watched the night it aired (January 3, 1993 - on home Christmas break from college). So I figured I'd capitalize on my TNG momentum and start with the season where Worf joined the cast.

There's some precedent for success with this approach. Back in 1999 I jumped into season seven with no problem and watched it all the way through to the finale. That finale coincided with both my leaving Dayton, OH for good as well as the end of a brief relationship with the girl who deserves the credit for getting me into any non-TOS-Trek. The night after I left Dayton, driving back east and breaking up the journey in a hotel room in Salamanca, NY, I caught a repeat of the finale and this scene very nearly made me check out of the hotel and drive back to Dayton. It was one of those nearly overwhelming impulses when a vulnerable moment/ fork in the road synchs up with something on the TV or the soundtrack and you very nearly dash out and change your life for what almost certainly would be misguided reasons. Glad I didn't, in retrospect, but I remember the feeling quite clearly; who wouldn't? 

I urge you to go to this review of S4 over at Where No Blog Has Gone Before. Not only will you find much more involved reviews of all the below, if you scroll down to the comments, you can read all my initial impressions and - in most cases - expanded remarks. I thought it'd be pretty lame to simply reproduce my comments from there, so all new (albeit abbreviated in most cases) remarks below. Let us begin. 


25.
 

Odo collapses and Bashir discovers that 
he is losing his ability to maintain solid form.

This is not the worst episode of season four. If you like the Changeling-saga, you might even think it's one of the better ones. Me, the Changelings make no damn sense. Their motivations, their abilities - they can change Odo into a solid? Really? And they can become any animal in the galaxy and beyond? Seems kind of odd they decided to have a regular old centurions-and-warships empire and have terrestrial political ambitions considering the thousand different ways these abilities would allow them to not have to do things that way at all - are nonsense, their visual is atrocious ("Odo with boobs!" must have been on the same whiteboard as "Ferengi butt heads!"), and well, I hate them. The Dominion is lame, and the Changelings are lamer. 

So, bottom spot it is. 



Giving the Sphere Builders in Enterprise virtually the same terrible visual ranks in the Top Five Decisions of Berman-Era Trek. 

I realize Odo's losing his powers isn't to be so closely examined - it's an X-Men plot, meant to be temporary. I get it. But it all relies (and augments) a basic un-Trek quality of DS9 that rubs me the wrong way. Someone once opined the difference between Trek and Star Wars is  that one is sci-fi (Trek) and one is sci-fantasy (Star Wars). This made sense once upon a time, not so much anymore. Doesn't make one worse than the other, just different genres, really, with different expectations, different requirements, different things you can get away with. You can get away with "They turned Odo into a solid!" in sci-fantasy; you shouldn't be getting away with it in sci-fi. 

Ah well. On the order of hills to die on, boats left the dock, etc, this is up there with the Old Man Yells at Cloud meme. Who cares. Trek has been sci-fantasy since at least Nemesis, really, and probably all the way back to TOS (aspects of it anyway) and likely will keep mutating. ("Punch it!")

Lastly, there seems to be some confusion about Odo's sexual abilities from random Bajorans. The implication seems to be now that he's a solid, hey, look out ladies! Or at least this one lady:



She should have made her move when he was able to assume any shape, no? Are the Changelings punishing Odo for killing another Changeling by turning him into a solid bang machine? What? Wouldn't they (sorry) simply not give him a penis, if punishment was the motivation? This whole thing makes zero damn sense. Rene Aubjernois does a good job with the character, all the kudos for the actor; the character/ concept is ridiculous. Hell, I got over Neelix and even grew to like that Talaxaian bastard, maybe something similar will happen with Odo. I hope so.


24.
 

Worf accidentally destroys a civilian ship during battle and faces a hearing to determine whether he should be extradited to the Klingon Empire.

An aspiring director can do the opposite of each scene here and come up accidentally with a pretty good deal. I don't know what LeVar Burton (who directed it) was thinking with the characters in flashback directly addressing the camera, but it's amateurish AF and does nothing but give the impression flashy tricks are being tried because the script is so boilerplate. Beyond boilerplate; microwave pizza, even, from a gas station. 

These Trek-trial episodes never make sense, Starfleet/Federation-wise. Ron Canada does a decent job as a vaguely Klingon-like prosecutor, but who cares. Well, he does, I guess, but it's an expensive spice lost in an unsavory stew.

23.

O'Brien's mind has been altered to create memories of being incarcerated for 20 years on an alien world on charges of espionage and sedition.

Look: Miles O'Brien is no Jean-Luc Picard. The episode hinges on a dynamic performance from Colm (maybe it was the director, who knows) and it didn't get one. All of which is to say, an emotionally powerful performance that connects with the viewer goes a long way in excusing silly-technical things. This is obviously the "anti" "Inner Light" episode, for example, and no one really focuses on the impossibility of the aliens' technology in that episode. Everyone's too busy being emotionally involved in Picard's story. The episode seems to realize it's this emotional journey that is the important part, and "Inner Light" ends with that wonderful scene of Picard alone in his ready room, playing the flute, reflecting wordlessly on the amazing experience he's had, how he's back, etc.

Here, we get only "the gloom whisperer." There's a better plot in here where O'Brien realizes how life-transformingly happy he is to not only not be in some cell smelling his own farts devoid of family for years, but not having aged as many years as he thought he had. What? How could this not be in the script? How can the episode be so uninterested in this? Did they not realize the human dynamics of such a plot/ the dramatic consequences? Seems so. Some of the reviews I've read on this one don't seem to comment on that, which is weird; here is a clear-cut case of reach exceeding grasp.

Does Starfleet not care at all that this alien culture did this to one of their officers? Seems grounds for something, does it not? It just slips into the background. 


22.
  


Worf, Dax and a revered Klingon Dahar master, Kor, search for the Sword of Kahless to unite the Klingon Empire.

It's mildly cool to see Kor again. He's not used too effectively here, and his bickering with Worf is forced, makes Worf seem less-than-Worf. Plus, how many damn times are we going to hear "Klingon blah-blah, unite the Empire?" It's hackneyed, stop it. 

I started with s4 because I like Worf. My memory is that DS9 was referred to as "Deep Space Worf" after Dorn joined the show. But he really doesn't have all that much to do this season. The Worf-centric episodes are, for the most part, very awkward and/or forgettable.

Magic swords exerting malevolent influence on their wielder is the whole point of the Elric series; this episode needs more Elric.


21.
 
 
Quark, Rom, Nog, and Odo are accidentally thrust back in time 
to Roswell, New Mexico, Earth, in 1947.

The good: some fun stuff from the Ferengi in this one. I've nothing but praise for the actors playing Ferengi on this show. Shimerman, Eisenberg, Grodénchik - all great. The set-up is kind of fun. An homage to "Tomorrow Is Yesterday," somewhat. Fine.

The bad: everything else. I'd also like to point out that the idea of Ferengi having sex organs on the sides of their faces, unprotected, is biologically unsound. Far be it for me to criticize the Preservers or whomever the hell-this-week-in-Trek-canon seeded the galaxy for humanoid lifeforms, but that one seems a little dumb. Also dumb? The universal translator as something literally inserted in one's ear that you can wiggle with a pen-cap or whatever. FFS. Who greenlights crap ideas like this?

It's mildly cool to see the shuttlecraft flying into the a-bomb explosion. There's some fun here, but it's kind of messy.


20.
 

While Odo assists a pregnant Lxawana Troi, Jake falls under 
the spell of a mysterious alien.

Oh good: a pregnant Lxawana episode! Someone up there likes me. 

The Lwaxana/ Odo/ Michael Ansara stuff isn’t so bad, actually (although, as explored much more in depth over at the WNBHGB review, they dropped the ball, somehow, in Odo’s big speech scene. Did they not realize the dynamics of this? How?) But the Jake/muse storyline is kind of gross. The muse/artist relationship has sexual overtones implied within it, so the difference in ages adds a dynamic that distracts rather than compels. The muse comes across like one of these teachers banging her junior high student. Which is fine - not the act itself but the story idea. This could've gone the "Sub Rosa" rate, and FWIW the Dog Star Omnibus position is ‘Always veer towards and not away' if veering one way is ever in question. 

Anyway, it's there but not acknowledged or explored, which makes it seem ickier than had they actually been more explicit. 

19.
 

Bashir is captured, with Chief O'Brien, by a truly outrageous group of Jem * Hadar  who are attempting to overcome their genetic addiction to Ketracel White. Meanwhile, Worf is finding it difficult to leave security matters to Security Chief Odo.

How do you follow up a Pregnant-Lwaxana-and-Odo episode at the We Hate McMolo Factory? With a Jem-Hadar-slash-teach-Worf-a-contrived-lesson episode. Thanks, Ira!

Not terrible, just ‘meh.’ I like the passive aggressive misdirection in that summary above. Worf would find it less difficult if anyone bothered filling him in on the things he needs to know in order to do his job.

* Is that the kind of joke that's older than dirt in DS9 circles? I apologize, even if it isn't.


18. and 17.

Sisko and Odo got to Earth to help protect against a Dominion invasion 
but it’s a false flag, or something.

Given my attitude on the Dominion and Changelings, it’s no surprise this two-parter more or less bounces off me. But I did like two things:

(1) Some franchise karma restored for Brock Peters after Undiscovered-Country-ing the poor man by casting him as Sisko’s Dad/ Jake’s grandfather. And (2) the scene between Changeling-O’Brien and Sisko, which is not only a nice little scene in its own right but also looks ahead to BSG, where this sort of thing plays out between skinjobs and humans.


16.
 

Cast out of Klingon society because of his brother's dishonor, Kurn asks Worf to kill him, while Kira and O'Brien investigate a mysterious high-energy discharge 
just outside Bajoran space.

We’ve seen the dishonor thing with Worf and the Sons of Mogh already. To bring it back and run Kurn through these kind of paces all before wiping his brain seems a lot of 90s-extreeeeeeeeeme for no sensible reason. I liked the little bit at the end where some pain crosses Worf’s face at his brother’s non-recognition, but too little, too late.

Why do this to Kurn? Was Tony Todd done with the role? Unless there are more Kurn episodes to come playing off this plot development, it seems a real waste of the character.  


15.
 

Dukat seeks Kir’as help in regaining his rank in the Cardassion Union.

The Cardassian soap opera proceeds apace. Not bad.  I like Ziyal fine, I like the idea of Dukat as some kind of renegade guerrilla fighter. A lot of the Dukat/ Kira stuff just gets repetitive, though. I like Dukat, or rather, I like Alaimo’s portrayal of him, and as a general bad guy for the series. 


14.
 

An elderly Jake Sisko relates the story of how he lost his father 
to a temporal displacement accident.

From a cursory search of online reviews, everyone seems to love this episode. Not me, I’m afraid. It’s not bad, but a couple of things work against it: 

(1) the old-Jake/fan-visitor story never feels real. Like literally none of it: the fan-visitor’s appearance, the fan-visitor’s fandom, the staging, old-Jake’s reaction and subsequent story-spilling, old-Jake himself. (1.5) I wasn’t too enamored with Tony Todd’s performance in general, actually, in any of the timeframes. This is worth mentioning, as I normally like him in just about anything. And (2) What’s the arc, here? The episode ends with alterna-Jake, who re-integrates Ghost Sisko to his point of departure, i.e. when he was struck by a bolt of techno-babble (as coined at WNBHGB). Sisko has some fragments of alterna-Jake’s story to relay, but it’s “Hey, cool story, Dad.” It prevents the consequences of the action from impacting any major member of the cast, a big writing room no-no. Wouldn’t it have been more interesting if Jake retained memories of his future self, somehowf?

And yet… I mean, it kinda works? Writing room no-nos are broken all the time, in Trek especially. Everything I just wrote applies to VOY’s “Course: Oblivion” for example, an episode I not only love but find very poignant. What gives? I’m reminded again of that old axiom, it’s how things make you feel that you remember, not what they actually are. Perhaps that’s the case here. Or perhaps I’m just an inconsistent bastard – whatever works!

How close is Cirroc Lifton at forty-two to Tony Todd at forty-two when he filmed this one?


Not too close, but it's wild how he could pass for Avery Brooks' real-life son in that picture.

13.
 

The Defiant becomes trapped in the atmosphere of a gas giant 
while battling with the Jem'Hadar.

Nothing wrong with a little back-to-basics action sort of episode every now and again. I liked those parts more than the Battle of Great Actors in Terrible Visuals (pt. ongoing, really) between Quark and James Cromwell. 


12.
 

After he nearly dies because his contract kept him from seeking medical help, Rom organizes the Guild of Restaurant and Casino employees, a union for Quark's downtrodden staff, and they go on strike.

Okay, so prior to this re-watch, I had a fairly consistent anti-Ferengi stance. I’ve been pleasantly surprised to find myself getting more of a kick out of them rather than being annoyed. The visuals and voices will always bug me, but the little touches the various actors are bringing to their roles and the broadly ridiculous-satire of the Ferengi civilization slowly won me over. This episode makes little sense – sometimes that ridiculous-satire aspect gets away from them – and they kind of fizzled on the story it seemed they started out to tell. But man is Brunt (“FCA!”) is a lot of fun. Jeffrey Combs really does great work on this show under his various guises.

Even the Worf subplot is fun. 


11.
 

A famous Bajoran poet who disappeared over 200 years ago appears from the wormhole and convinces Sisko that he is the true Emissary, but when he announces a return to the pre-occupation caste system, Sisko points out it would disqualify Bajor for membership in The Federation. O'Brien is less than enthusiastic when Keiko announces she's expecting.

RIP to the great Richard Libertini. I’m always happy when he shows up in things. Likewise to Jane Espenson (though no RIP, of course) who for a stretch was my favorite writer; anytime I was moved to look at the credits for a TV show, it was either her or David Fury, and (I noticed) her episodes were always great, regardless of the show. 

I’m not the biggest fan of Bajorans, but I like the idea that the Prophets are real and live in the wormhole. (“God has a plan for you, Gaius.” Cut to the Opera House Celestial Temple.) And I like how Sisko’s tied up in it all, and his general attitude towards things. So, all in all, this episode lands just fine with me. 


10.
 

A Klingon fleet arrives on its way to expand the Klingon Empire at the expense of the Cardassians in the face of the Dominion threat, and Worf is brought to DS9 to negotiate.

In theory I should love this one: Klingon intrigue, fleets of Klingons, I love Gowron, Worf, etc. In the actual watching of it, it’s… okay. Probably better than okay. But this is all Trek-drama I just don’t care about. The whole “going to war” thing with Trek brings in a lot of logistics that are just not suited for Trek, I feel. As I was with Voyager, I’m surprised how much DS9 feels like a test-run for ideas better realized in BSG

Anyway, the Klingon/Cardassian War interests me more than the Federation/Dominion War by sole virtue of the Dominion failing to excite my interest altogether. For every Trek fan like me, though, there are dozens that like both the Dominion and the whole “war!” storyline playing out in Trek; more power to them. I raise my glass from a table in a room adjacent - k'plagh!


9.

Sisko and the Defiant crew join forces with the Jem'Hadar to stop a group of renegades from gaining power using an Iconian Gateway discovered in the Gamma Quadrant. 

Combs is great as Weyoun. The Vorta are somewhat interesting, although I don’t like the Jem’hadar nor this “we control them through the White” business. It’s just too much. Plus it’s not very original. 

That makes it somewhat difficult for me to get into the spirit of things with an episode like this, which basically just throws a military-tropes net over some nominal Trek machinery and lets it run. And yet – actually, I kind of enjoy this one. I don’t think it makes any real sense for Starfleet to be in on this mission, but there are some nice moments. And some nice Sisko moments, too, which are appreciated. I want to like this show and these characters, so I’m always looking to collect more of such moments.

And hey - the Iconians. Cool. 


8.
 

Quark is diagnosed with a terminal disease, Dorek's Syndrome, and given a week to live. Due to an unavoidable accident on the runabout Volga, Miles' and Keiko's unborn baby is transferred to Major Kira by Dr. Bashir.

You’re a showrunner. What do you do when one of your actresses gets pregnant or the kid you hired to play a kid grows too tall in the off-season? For a TV production these are real problems that have to be solved. Best if you can write it into the show somehow. Sometimes it works, sometimes it feels kind of wonky. I think what they did here with Nana Visitor’s pregnancy is probably between the two.

That kid is twenty-four now.


7.
 

Forced to bring along Dukat on a personal mission to investigate the fate of a Cardassian prison ship Ravinok that disappeared 6 years ago, Kira discovers the real reason her old enemy wants to accompany her. Sisko appears to have reservations about Kasidy Yates' coming to live on the station.

This intro of Ziyal doubles as a tribute to the movie The Searchers. Which makes Kira Captain Pike by the laws of Trek-role-counterparting as I understand them. Watch out for delta ray radiation, Nerys.

It also triples, I guess, as a showcase for how drop-dead gorgeous both Nana Visitor and Penny Johnson were in the 90s. Not that they’re not gorgeous now or that actresses should be vetted by how physically attractive the likes of Dog Star Omnibus finds them. All the disclaimers/ whatever you like. Just don't bury the truth; they were smoking.


6.
 

Sisko learns that his girlfriend Kasidy might be a Maquis smuggler. Garak and Ziyal find themselves increasingly drawn to one another.

Here is a strong Sisko episode. Sisko is a character and Avery Brooks is an actor where I spend a lot of time wondering when something is going to click. He definitely imbues the character with little ticks and physical gestures, but is it enough? For most, I guess. For me, the jury is still somewhat out. This one feels like the Sisko they should have been emphasizing from the beginning. Maybe they have, hell -  I did skip s1-s3 after all. We’ll see.

Either way this one is a success. I'm pretty anti-Maquis - I especially hate that they call themselves after the French Resistance from World War Two, that just rings so untrue to me - and it still managed to reach me.

5. 
 

Odo’s hidden feelings for Kira surface when the visiting Bajoran First Minister, Shakaar Edon begins to court her.

A very moving episode. They got the details right for the experience they were trying to get across. I’m not a big Odo fan, as you might have noticed. Mainly it’s just the Changeling aspect, I find the visual/ concept too vague. They (and Rene Auberjonois) managed to reach me nevertheless, especially at the end where it’s left unsaid just why Odo has changed his mind about soundproofing his quarters. Subtle enough pay-off to a rather conspicuous set-up from the beginning. 

Speaking of, I get that Odo is exercising his shape-shifting in his quarters in what I’m sure is a methodical manner, but the idea of his having this after-hours turning-into-beasts-and-swans side (all with this dubious-looking “equipment”) makes my eyes roll fairly hard. 

This bit where he waits for Kira to respond to something in a way he knows she will is great stuff.
Who plays Shakaar? Is that Ronin from Sub Rosa? You bet it is!

"Not just one but TWO of the HOWARD women," says Picard, every time he appears.

4.
  

Bashir plays a 1960s secret agent in a holosuite, when Garak unexpectedly intrudes, but his help is needed when the DS9 computer uses the holosuite to store the patterns of other crew members during a transporter accident.

This is neither perfect Trek nor perfect Bond pastiche. But it’s a very agreeable stretch of terrain between those two things. It drags whenever they feel the need to literalize what’s going on (re-stabilizing the neural energies or what not). I rank it as highly as I do mainly because it’s fun, and hey, fun is enjoyable. Both Siddig and Robinson imbue their performances with appropriate pathos. Or is it ethos. I need to look this up, be right back.

Okay, so ethos or the ethical appeal, means to convince an audience of the author's credibility or character. Pathos or the emotional appeal, means to persuade an audience by appealing to their emotions. Apparently neither of these is what I was thinking of.

3.
 
 

Bashir tries to free the population of a Gamma Quadrant world in the Teplan system of an engineered disease left by the Dominion 200 years previously.

I just don’t get the Gamma Quadrant/ Dominion. What is their deal? They’re so over the top, but for what reason? The logistics don’t make sense.

Logistics aside, this was a fine enough little episode, I just get grumpy when my brain starts picking apart the Dominion/ the GQ. Is there a stretch of the GQ on the other side of the wormhole that is Dominion-free, or something? How? Why do they care? Why did they stop? 

2.
 
 

Sisko attempts to rescue Jake after he is lured into the war-torn Mirror Universe by his mother’s living counterpart.

I didn’t expect to enjoy this one. I think the mirror universe concept kind of worked once (and then again as a callback in the Enterprise two-parter) and that it’s unfair that the other shows couldn’t do one, but hey, only so much to go around. Because the concept ceases to work the second you call the slightest attention to it. Sure in an infinite universe there are infinite possibilities, but that doesn’t (or shouldn’t) mean there’s just ONE mirror universe where everyone from the various series lives and interacts and they’re all evil. It’s too much. 

And yet, I mean, it’s mainly an excuse for the actors to do something different here and there, and they’re kind of fun. And this is no different. I can respect DS9 for trying something a little different and giving their mirror episodes a bit of continuity. And I like Smiley (mirror O’Brien) and the Intendent (mirror Kira).

Wouldn’t Jennifer Sisko be evil, though? Are some counterparts just not mirror-y? Or was “our” Jenn Sisko secretly evil? Either way, she and Jake had some nice scenes. 

1.
 
 

Dax is reunited with Lenara Kahn, whose previous host was the wife of one of Dax's former hosts, Torias Dax, and the two struggle with their feelings for one another.

Here’s a wonderful story with great performances. A lot of heart in this one, sold primarily by the performance of guest Susannah Thompson. Kudos to all involved, but especially her. 

Does this retcon the Trill customs we learned about back in "The Host"? I think it does, but I don't quite remember the specifics. Not a dealbreaker either way.

I feel like I should have more to say, but there it is. Great stuff.


~
And now: the leftover screencaps.


"Damn it, Miles...!"
I love that Garak looks like he could launch into a talk show opening monologue in this shot. "It can be hard keeping up with the Cardassians, can't it?" (Audience groans) "Why does everyone groan when I say that?"
Oh, it's not so distant.

Until next time, friends.

9.04.2020

Reviews and Overviews (Books)

Links to All
Books-Related Content
Here at the Omnibus 





1.
DIDN'T YOU ALREADY DO THIS ONCE?

I did, yes. I sometimes marvel at the plans I lay out for myself that never come to fruition. I figured I should make a links-post to the books I actually blogged up rather than the ones I thought I would back in January 2016. 



2.

I mad a project out of reading the fifty-ish Hard Case Crime books I've picked up over the years. I made it through ten. Not the fault of the Hard Case imprint, just my time and attention. 


1Double Feature by Donald E. Westlake 
2361 by Donald E. Westlake 
3The Last Match by David Dodge 
4Say It with Bullets by Richard Powell 
5Joyland by Stephen King
6Quarry, Quarry's Deal, Quarry's Cut, Quarry's Choice, Quarry's Ex, Quarry's Vote, Quarry's Climax by Max Allan Collins 
7Blood Sugar by Daniel Kraus
8. Killing Castro by Lawrence Block
9. The Colorado Kid by Stephen King
10. Later by Stephen King


3.
BOND... 




4.
- STEPHEN KING
(all fiction. Plenty of sub-links in there, too. That link is the most recent Rankings, but you can click off in there to the 2016 revision as well as the original 2013 ones. So generous!)

- Low Men in Yellow Coats 
Ur
-  The Wind Through the Keyhole
-  'The Little Sisters of Eluria' and 'Everything's Eventual'

(Came out after the Rankings above. I didn't bother to review Elevation.)

- THE MOVIES
Pt. 1, Pt. 2

Here's a post I called "King's Garage Sale" just covering some of the unfinished drafts of the King's Highway I ended up with. Leave no stone unturned!

And a couple of others: (1) Different Way of Reading Stephen King, and my favorite of them all, Duma Key. There's another few impromptu reviews of Duma Key, each time I did the rankings. I really love that book.



5.




6.
FROM BAUHAUS TO OUR HOUSE

pt. 1, pt. 2, pt. 3







7.
WILLIAM F. BUCKLEY, JR.

- The Blackford Oakes Novels, pt. 1 and pt. 2

- Non-fiction Collections:
Rumbles Left and Right, The Jeweler's Eye, The Governor Listeth, 
Inveighing We Will Go, Execution Eve, A Hymnal, 
Reflections of a Libertarian Journalist, Right Reason

- Personal Adventures at Sea and On Land:

- Coda (books by Christopher Buckley, Van Galbraith, 
Christopher Little, and more)




9.03.2020

Blood Sugar by Daniel Kraus

(2019)


From the dark imagination of bestselling novelist Daniel Kraus - co-author with Guillermo del Toro of The Shape of Water - comes a Halloween crime story that's like nothing you've ever read before.

In a ruined house at the end of Yellow Street, an angry outcast hatches a scheme to take revenge for all the wrongs he has suffered. With the help of three alienated kids, he plans to hide razor blades, poison, and broken glass in Halloween candy, maiming or killing dozens of innocent children. But as the clock ticks closer to sundown, will one of his helpers - an innocent himself, in his own streetwise way - carry out or defeat the plan?

Told from the child's POV, in a voice as unforgettable as A Clockwork Orange, Kraus' novel is at once frightening an emotional, thought-provoking and laugh-out-loud funny. It'll make you rethink your concepts of family, loyalty, and justice - and will leave you double-checking the wrappers on your Halloween candy for the rest of your days. 

So says the back cover.

I made it to pg. 53 and this paragraph:


"I find Midge over by the cherry cough drops and lecture her how Barack Obama used to be the chief mightyducker of the whole US of A not to mention the stone cold robocop that killed the dude that did the twin towers. Little sister gets confused cuz usually Im (sic) lecturing her about the Two Towers from Lord of the Rings and now she probably thinks Barack Obama killed Sauron. Politics are mad complex."

Folks, I can't read a whole book like this. Life is too short. I was sick of this by pg. 2. The back cover references A Clockwork Orange, but it just didn't hit me that way. I wish it did. The last time I read that (1992) I really loved it. But I've never been able to read any other Burgess, despite an enduring (still) interest in the man's work and perspectives. I don't know if there's a connection.

Take a look at these reviews on Goodreads. Holy moley do people love this book. And it sounds like there's some dark, disturbing stuff going on that I didn't get to. I'm all for unconventional structure and narrators and dark, disturbing stuff, but the veneer of this one, with the cutesy blackface (kinda) narration and the overstacked deck, and it just pushed me away.


Kudos, sir, you apparently landed - and hard - with everyone but me. 

This one was two hundred twenty pages, so I gave it a little more than twenty percent of its total before punting. I wish I enjoyed it more - I think the author skillfully switched between voices, it's just I didn't want to read any of them. The fake letters written by Jody strewn throughout were the best parts. (I kinda flipped and skimmed after pg. 53 and read long stretches.) 

"Believe, yo."

~
The Hard Case Crime Chronicles will continue 
with Killing Castro by Lawrence Block,
appearing sooner or later.

Seven Quarry Books by Max Allan Collins


We return to The Hard Case Crime Chronicles with seven Quarry books by Max Allan Collins. 

Collins ("Mac" to follow) can be a hard author to keep up with. Over the past year, not counting any of the below, I've read USS Powderkeg (great title, great plot, needed another draft) and Scarface and the Untouchable, pt. 1 (pt. 2 here) of a comprehensive biography of Elliot Ness that he co-authored with A. Brad Schwartz. Some of that Ness story was originally written in the 80s as four fiction books, recently collected into an e-book at the very agreeable price of $2.99.

I still plan to listen to this audiocassette of the first of them, acquired earlier this year (for more than the whole e-book collection. So it goes. As Frank London once klezmer-ed, in the marketplace, all is subterfuge.)

I mention all that because it seems no matter what other author or project has my attention, he's always in rotation along with whatever else I'm reading.  I haven't even mentiond the Nate Heller and Mike Hammer books and audiobooks I have in queue, or the additional ones as part of this Hard Case Crime Chronicles series (The Consummata and Two for the Money.) 

Anyway- the last batch of Hard Case Crime books I got off eBay had a bunch of Mac's Quarry books. I had two of them previously (reviewed here and reread for the below) but six were first time reads. These are NOT the complete Quarry novels; that list is here. Will there be another post with the rest of them, namely Quarry's List, The Last Quarry, The First Quarry, Quarry in the Middle, The Wrong Quarry, Quarry in the Black, and Killing Quarry? Probably, but it will likely be after this whole HCCC series finishes, so it could be years. I know how I am, though – if I start a series and like more than two of the books (which is the case here) it bothers me to leave the series unfinished.

That's how they get ya. 

Rather than rank them least-to-most favorite, the below are presented in publication order. A quick word on the publishing: Mac published four Quarry books in the 70s, a few more in the 80s, then all of them under the Hard Case Crime imprint, along with several new (and ongoing) entries. The below mixes all the eras of Quarry's publishing life. 


HCC-s02

Originally published as The Broker (1976). 


The assignment was simple: stake out the man’s home and kill him. Easy work for a professional like Quarry. But when things go horribly wrong, Quarry finds himself with a new mission: learn who hired him, and make the bastard pay.

The first and in some ways the best of the Quarry books. From the author’s afterword: “I wanted to take it up a notch – my ‘hero’ would be a hired killer. The books would be in first person. In the opening chapter, Quarry would do something terrible, giving readers an early chance to bail; late in the book he would again do something terrible, to confront readers with just what kind of person they’ve been easily identifying with. (…) A war-damaged Vietnam veteran. I had a good friend (now deceased) who was very much like Quarry – a sweet, smart, funny guy who learned to kill people for ‘Uncle Sugar.’” Also “I wanted to make a comment about Americans in general – that we had, through Vietnam, become numb to death. That we had grown used to watching body bags being loaded into planes as we ate our TV dinners taking in the nightly news.” 

A fine (and era-appropriate) American New Wave sensibility. And really that’s what should have happened – this shouldn’t be a book that came out in 1976, it should be a cinema classic in all its grainy-7os-footage glory. Would’ve been awesome. Still could. Well, sort of – you know what I mean. 

This is prototypical Quarry, and the author succeeded pretty well in his mission statement above: Quarry’s a dick, throughout, and every so often does or says something awful. This might make modern readers uncomfortable. He has a tendency to describe women by their tits and men by their ethnic stereotypes; he’s also just an asshole, in general, the type of person who's always one-upping the other person in a conversation. Is this not, though, the way it should be? Is he supposed to be a killer with a heart of gold? A passionate feminist? This is a first person POV from a guy who is not a sociopath but by virtue of body count a serial killer. 

I’m staying spoiler-free for these Hard Case Crime Chronicles and sometimes that handicaps my ability to review these things the way I want to. This is a very well-constructed book. The other characters particularly a fellow Vietnam vet working for the Broker, whom Quarry instantly browbeats, much like a short-timer would for a newly arrived soldier in a Vietnam movie, reflect theme and contrast Quarry in a way not always present in the other Quarry books. 


HCC-s04

Originally published as The Dealer (1976)


As part of his plan to target other hitmen, Quarry follows one from steamy Florida to the sober Midwest, But this killer isn't a man at all - she's a sloe-eyed beauty, as dangerous in bed as she is deadly on the job. Has Quarry met his match?

Spoiler alert; he has not.

This book is kind of terrible, sorry. The whole post-Broker set-up of the Quarry books, where Quarry has the Broker's list of who has targets out on them, travels to wherever one of them may be, susses out the scene (always with more arrogance than is fun to actually read or partake in), then offers his services to the "client," is very cumbersome. Watching him talk the client into, berate the client's staff, etc. I'd have rethought this. But as it's the set-up for several books, what can you do, the deed is done. 

Mostly, though, Quarry's POV is so relentlessly juvenile and silly throughout that it completely dismantles anything else going on. Here's a mash-up poem of some of the more over-the-top inner musings of our protagonist:


I was watching that Oriental-eyed woman with the big breasts.
The smile was phony, but she was good at it. 
And the bustline was real, so who cared?
If she was here, she'd be easy enough to spot:
the Oriental eyes, the awesome breasts, how could you miss her? 
Even if the room were full of  women.
"I'll get right on it," Lucille said. But those Oriental eyes said Go fuck yourself.
Dark pubic hair against the whiteness of her loins. 
She was an architectural wonder, this girl. 
One day, if she lived long enough, those massive breasts would have to droop. 
Gravity, like death, is inevitable. 
But right now she and her high, huge breasts were alive and well in Des Moines,  Iowa.
She sure wasn't the dragon lady, not in the sack anyway.
The promise of the Oriental eyes was not delivered.
The jacket came off to reveal a yellow-and-tan-striped halter top that caressed her large breasts, cradled them like a child sleeping in a hammock.
She was on her stomach but turned to one side, hugging a pillow, against which rested one generous breast, cuddled there, not squashed, its large dark nipple soft and smooth and delicate, a flower with its petals unfolded.
Legs sprawled but gracefully so.
I wondered how decorum would feel about those two big naked boobs.
Her back-up man had almost as big tits as she did.
We humped like a couple of teenagers in the back of a car,
 with a desperate, innocent horniness.

Amen. I don't do this to berate the author, by the way. The only thing that matters is whether or not it makes sense for the character to think/ say these things. Does it? His breast descriptions are right out of Richard Blade. Is he sitting in the chair cooly appraising the swell of areolas? Who thinks like that? Would a hardened assassin whose soul was scrubbed to the raw in Vietnam really wander through life like this? I don't now. Perhaps so. I think not, though. It works against whatever else is going on, to say the least. None of this is over the top for 70s genre fiction, really; check out any blog dedicated to paperback novels of the 1960s and 1970s and you'll quickly see the Quarry books are middle-of-the-pack offensive to modern readers, even with all the drooling over the sloe-eyed bra-busters up there.

All of which is to say: it's a combination of a writer applying too much force to a set-up that couldn't quite accommodate it. I'm a 70s-movie guy in a lot of ways; I can watch a dickhead go through the motions of a script or setting if the style is right or other factors are in play, if the mood is right. That is the case in most of these Quarry books, in fact, but it's not the case here in Quarry's Deal. 


"He'd been watching Ruthy throughout, hanging on her every word, savoring everything about her with that special fatherly sort of lust that gives incest a bad name."


HCC-s05


Originally published as The Slasher (1977). 


It's normal to see bodies on the set of an adult film. But when they're dead bodies - and the cast and crew discover they're trapped in a house with a serial killer - Quarry's got his work cut out for him.

I liked this one, though it falls apart a bit at the end. The reveal of the killer and everything after. Up to that point, though, it cruises along pretty nicely. Somewhere between Inherent Vice and Boogie Nights is a great Paul Thomas Anderson adaptation of this one; wish I could peek into that alternate timeline and watch it. 

Quarry is at his most Mike Hammer-esque here, though. (Seems to me he should be at his most Mike Hammer-esque in the next one on our list, not here.) This one is dripping with 70s-isms, which were not 70s-isms at the time it was written, just nowdays-isms. I like that aspect of just about anything, but here in particular. It's appropriately sleazy.

"In my line of work, it pays to be skeptical, even paranoid, especially in the face of anything even vaguely coincidental. Otherwise, you may find yourself dead. And death is nature's way of telling you you fucked up."


HCC-s06

Originally published as Primary Target (1987)

Now retired and happily married, Quarry turns down a million-dollar contract to assassinate a political candidate. It's not the sort of assignment you can just walk away from without consequences - but coming after Quarry has consequences, too.

As mentioned above this one should be the most Mike-Hammer-esque of the series. But Quarry's grief/ vengeance is actually rather underplayed. He takes a little revenge against one of the people who killed his pregnant wife by letting him believe he (Quarry) is going to murder his wife and family before shooting him. ("There's no reason to believe there's anything after this life but darkness, but I wanted to make sure the son of a bitch spent a few minutes in Hell.") But outside of that the wife is pretty much a forgettable character, and her death/ the whole loss of Quarry's A-frame house on Paradise Lake is kind of shuffled into the background. There's an episode of Hawaii Five-O where we meet Dan-o's fiancee (Anne Archer) in the same episode she's killed (halfway through) and then he's over it by the end. This is a bit more in-depth than that, but Anne Archer had more of an impact than... I literally already forgot her name, had to look it up. (Linda.)

Maybe this has more to do with Anne Archer. Could be an imperfect example. This is not a bad book, but the sameness of the set-up (Quarry bullies his way into his target's graces, becomes head of security, bullies the staff, bullies the target, oversells everything, sees someone he recognizes but must hide it) is a little grating. But there's an expectation of repetition in any serial genre fiction; I mean, how many times does James Bond allow himself to be captured, etc. So not a dealbreaker.

The political side of it stops short of being explicitly all-Republicans-are-hypocritical-asshole-fascists, etc. Which is appreciated, even if it's somewhat insincere. Still: better than anything one could hope for nowadays.


"Pros these boys had not been. Even driving a brand-new car they had managed to leave a trail of stupidity all the way back home. They were lucky they were already dead, or I'd be killing them again."


HCC-102
(2011)

Even the enigmatic hit man called Quarry had to start somewhere. And for him, that was the day he returned stateside from 'Nam to find his young wife cheating. He'd killed plenty overseas, so killing her lover was no big deal. And when he was recruited to use his skills as a contract killer. that transition was easy, too. 
He survived in this jungle as he had in that other one - by expecting trouble. 
What he didn't expect was ever running into her again...

The back cover copy - what I'm using for all the plot summaries - is a bit longer than usual, yet it reveals less. I mean, you basically get the character's origin story, and a restatement of the title. The actual plot has more to do with moviemaking and reflects the author's real-life experience as an indie filmmaker. That part of it is not as intrusive as it could be, mainly because the reader is right there with the protagonist learning things from the ground-up in an organic way. 

A few curveballs in this one to the usual set-up with Quarry pretending to be gay as part of his cover, which leads to some unexpected plot resolutions, not to mention his ex-wife and real-world past. As in Quarry's Cut it deals with a film set where Quarry shows up and pretends he's from a magazine. Stick with what you know, I guess. The time frame (1980) works in both Quarry's and Mac's favor here. (You know, I don't know if there is a Quarry set post-Y2k, with the internet and ubiquitous surveillance and cell phones, etc. He might even get killed in another book for all I know; I've avoided finding out so far.)

As in Quarry, which featured "pert Peg Baker", this one features a fictitious Playmate, Tiffany Goodwin, who is revealed to have been Playmate of the year "half a decade ago." I kept wondering who she was supposed to be a stand-in for. (Marilyn Lange, maybe? While we're here, my guess for Peg Baker was Jan Roberts. Quarry references Playboy a lot - it's fair to try to figure out who he's talking about.). Eric Conrad - the gay male lead who comes on to Quarry - starred on a popular show about cops on a beach with lots of slow-motion running. That's not a precise fit for any 70s show I know (although this was written in 2011 so it could be a post-Pacific Blue/ Baywatch projection back in time) but I'd like to know which one he meant.


"A couple of framed desert landscapes is all that separated this from a Ramada Inn 
in Who Farted, West Virginia."


HCC-118
(2015)

Quarry is a pro in the murder business. When the man he works for becomes a targethimself, Quarry is sent South to remove a traitor in the ranks. But in this wide-open city - with sin everywhere and betrayal around every corner - Quarry must make the most dangerous choice of his deadly career: who to kill?

The moral dilemma described there and in the title wasn't as weighing as it might sound. Basically once the novel gets to that point, it's fairly obvious which character he's not going to kill. I thought back to the original character description, i.e. "late in the book he would again do something terrible, to confront readers with just what kind of person they’ve been easily identifying with." But I felt in no danger of that actually happening. Except: the whole relationship with the young girl is kind of gross altogether. So, mission accomplished.

This one is set in 1972. I'm not overly familiar with the Quarry chronology, as I've mentioned - this endeavor will remain a whatever-I-grab-off-the-shelf-in-whatever-order affair to keep it flowing at the necessary pace - but that puts it a year or so before the events described in the first Quarry aka The Broker (1976). The 70s touches (the early videotapes and TV schedule) are all appreciated. That goes for the next one as well.

"'Who was it said 'whatever one sows, so shall he reap?' 
'God or some shit,' the sheriff said with a shrug.'"


HCC-130
(2017)

Memphis, 1975. 'Raunchy' doesn't begin to describe Max Climer's magazine, Climax, or his all-hour strip club, or his planned video empire. And evangelists, feminists, and local watchdog groups all want him out of business. But someone wants more than that and has hired a killer to end Max's career permanently. Only another hit man - the ruthless professional known as Quarry - can keep Climer from becoming a casualty in the Sexual Revolution.

I loved it when I read it the first time, and I still enjoyed it on a reread, but there's that sense of repetition again. I mean, this is just a slight variation on any of the ones above with some of the same details, characters, settings, etc. You expect some repetition with these sorts of things, sure, but maybe a bit too much of a hodge-podge grab of previous books, here. The later-John-Gardner's-Bond effect, maybe. 

I think Climer comes across as a cross between Al Goldstein and Larry Flynt, but the author alludes to some interesting reading on historic Memphis in his Afterword. It's worth mentioning that the short-lived Cinemax series with Logan Marshall-Green as Quarry (with author, below) was set in 1970s Memphis. I prefer the character to be a Midwestern one, but the show had its moments.


I reviewed one of the episodes at the end of this post.
Logan's a good fit for the character. Certainly looks more like how I picture him in the books than this Jack Kirby lookalike they gave him for the Hard Case Crime covers:

"His leisure jacket was a plaid number 
from the Who-Shot-the-Couch? collection."

~
The Hard Case Crime Chronicles will continue with:
Blood Sugar by Daniel Kraus,
sooner or later.