There’s a new tradition a-brewing round these parts: the evening armchair short story read. I’m even following through with it! I've read dozens so far. Fingers crossed I’m not jinxing myself, here, with a giant Mission Accomplished banner. It’s easy to come up with what sounds like a good or workable routine and another thing to actually and successfully integrate it into one’s other routines, especially if one is lazy or set in his ways, or if one's kids are prone to cranking various YouTube mayhem.
So far so good, though. For at least one portion of any evening, you'll find me parked in the blue chair by the window, reading and heroically tuning out the chaos and trying not to choke from the emanations of the ancient, dusty radiator in that corner of the living room.
It all started (sort of) with this:
Got that freshman year at URI, September 1992. Finished it, I forget, sometime around 2016. This is the book that more than any other opened up the world of short stories to me. It was the assigned reading for a class that I think I ended up failing, I honestly can’t remember. (I mostly blew off school in favor of an endless 80s-movie party, that first year at URI. Je ne regrette rien.)
A few years down the road I finished getting that English degree at Rhode Island College and took several more courses on the short story. Is it my favorite of all the writing genres? It might be. Stephen King once lamented in the intro to one of his collections that books of short stories rarely make the bestseller lists, and that seems true. Why, though? They’re so portable, and you get a whole bunch of stories instead of just one. Moreover, you’d figure it would follow the general trend of ADHD/ character-max-limit/tik-tok-clip of everything else: the shorter, the better. Why don't they top the charts, more often than novels? Maybe this says something about people, I don't know.
Here’s fifteen(ish) short story collections that have kept me occupied lately. Not an exhaustive list of either what I’m reading, have read, planned to read, what’s to recommend, yadda yadda. (If it was I’d find room for Life After God by Douglas Coupland or the Collected Stories of DJ Breece Pancake, John O’Hara - one of the best, right there - or many more. My friend Joe will undoubtedly write "You missed one" when I post this link to Facebook; that one's worth reading, too.) Just the usual McRigamarole.
~
One of the brightest lights of France’s Troisième République, Maurois had heretofore managed to stay almost completely off my radar until recently reading Bridge Over the Rivew Kwai reminded me of the literary creation Colonel Bramble. I had this book of short stories hanging around for many year but had never looked into any of his other works. One of which (The Fall of France) I just finished and heartily recommend. It’s a book of non-fiction dispatches from the Phony War, i.e. those Sunday newspaper pieces that appeared in France from declaration of war 1939 to the German invasion May and June 1940, and then a second part written “on the run” during said Invasion.
Okay, I already did my WW2 post, and the one listed here is not The Fall of France (or the other very interesting Maurois books I picked up: Illustrated History of the USA, The Miracle of England, and bios on Disraeli and the Hugo families) and I can’t say too, too much about it yet, as I’ve only read a single one (the first).
I liked it, though, and beseech you to join me in reintroducing one of the twentieth century’s intellectual giants back into the cultural conversation. Faisons Maurois Formidable Encore!
~
My wife got me this one years ago. Some are little more than sketches, others (like the opener) are as powerful as any of her novels.
~
"They share a love of Fudgsicles, speedboats, and WKRP in Cincinnati."
Favorites from the above in no particular order: "The Secret of the Pyramids," "Midnight Magic," "Airwaves," "Proper Gypsies," "Tunica," "Night Flight," "Shiloh," "Detroit Skyline 1949," and "A New Wave Format."
~
This guy came onto my radar by tripping over a box of forgotten donations at the VFW. I've told the story before. These were books meant for soldiers overseas but never made it over there. The VFW was a place where a lot of things (and people) never reached their final destination. Among the Missing was in there, and I read it on one of my shifts and was like ‘holy crap.’ (Put that as a blurb on the cover!) Fantastic stuff, start to finish.
For years after that I followed Chaon on Tumblr and he’d post a lot of interesting and varied things, but I almost got the impression he retired or gave it up. How wrong I was: now he’s got a lot more books available. Good! I haven’t read any from Safe House yet, but if they’re only half as good as the ones in Among the Missing, I’ll be more than satisfied.
If you read nothing else by this guy, read “Big Me.”
“I suppose this tells you a lot about what I was like as a boy, but these were among the first ideas I considered. I believed wholeheartedly in the notion that time travel would seen be a reality, just as I believed in UFOs and ESP and Bigfoot. I used to worry, in all seriousness, whether humanity would last as long as the dinosaurs had lasted. What if we were just a brief, passing phase on the planet? I felt strongly that we needed to explore other solar systems and establish colonies. The survival of the human species was very important to me.
“Perhaps it was because of this that I began to keep a journal. I had recently read The Diary of Anne Frank and had been deeply moved by the idea that a piece of you, words on a page, could live on after you were dead. I imagined that, after a nuclear holocaust, an extraterrestrial boy might find my journal, floating along among some bits of meteorite and pieces of buildings that had once been Earth. The extraterrestrial boy would translate my diary, and it would become a bestseller on his planet. Eventually, the aliens would be so stirred by my story that they would call off the intergalactic war they were waging and make a truce.
“In these journals I would frequently write messages to myself, a person whom I addressed as Big Me, or The Future Me. Rereading those entries as the addressee, I try not to be insulted, since my former self admonishes me frequently. ‘I hope you are not a failure,’ he says. ‘I hope you are happy.’ He says.
~
Just the other day I sat down to read one of the ones I haven’t yet and found myself instead three quarters of the way through “The Mist”. Again. (I mean, I just re-read it last year or the year before. And not too long ago before then and on and on.)
What can I say? I love “The Mist.” More than many, it takes me back to being however-old and reading The Stephen King Companion over and over. But more to the story than that, of course, and more to this collection than “The Mist.” of course. I can vouch for the Joe Haldeman one (suitably disturbing) and the Russell Kirk one – the rest all look (and I’m sure are) fantastic.
~
Richard Matheson? ‘Nuff said.
~
Actually, that picture up there is wrong: my version is this one, which has two selections from The Crack-Up as well as the eternally awesome "Show Mr. and Mrs. F. To Number ____" One of the best titles, ever. There are about forty movies wrapped up in that one story, and about a hundred scattered throughout the above in general.
Taps From Reveille is a gem, not only for “Babylon Revisited” (arguably FSF’s best work this side of Gatsby) but for "Family in the Wind," which has some of the best hurricane writing I've ever read. There's a whole race-conflict movie in there, too - it's amazing stuff. The "Basil" and "Josephine" stories are little remarked on today, but those familiar with Scott and Zelda's bios can find lots of intriguing things between the lines there.
And The Pat Hobby Stories, I’ve been reading this one every few years since the summer after I graduated high school. Still wonderful. The last time was a few years back and I remember thinking, okay I might be good for awhile / maybe I'd outgrown them, but just the other day I reread "Boil Some Water - Lots Of It" and was shaking my head at how good it was. Someone needs to turn those into prestige-TV gold. Any actor who achieved fame in the 90s would be perfect for it in the 2020s.
~
The first time I heard the famous “Necklace” story was in a tent in a campground in or near Munich, I think, but it might have been Frankfurt, on AFN Radio. I like that I have an Old Time Radio memory from when I was eight (I think) for a Nineteenth Century author. Like all the 50s and 60s music in my 80s memories, it lends a disorienting time travel aesthetic to revisiting such things. I’ve tried to pinpoint which radio version of “The Necklace” that might’ve been many times over the years - I think it's this one but honestly, who knows. (UPDATE: I listened to it last night and I'm almost positive it was. Another childhood moment preserved in amber! Thank you, internet.)
That reminds me: I have a different hardcover (somewhere) of Maupassant’s short fiction that I’ve never been able to find on any list of published works, published 1930-something. I don’t have a picture of it, but I’ve looked up all the details therein and nothing. I like to think of it as something an interdimensional traveler left behind. I hope he or she comes back and leaves more books.
~
"Bigger Than Worlds" is essential stuff, though. It's an essay that really gets the imagination going. Science fact that hits you like science fiction, or the work of Shusei Nagaoka or the Terran Trade Authority books. I like "Bigger Than Worlds" enough that the other day when I meant to read a different story from this volume, I... well, you guessed it. I'll get there, I promise. And all his other work, too.
~
That’s not the set I have, above. (That one's hard to come by.) I just have Pook of Puck’s Hill (a hymn to English heritage and landscape from his later years) and a different Collected Short Stories. Just a generic blue volume, about five hundred pages, not any of these.
I also have a Complete Kipling on the Kindle that would take me forever to get through if I dedicated myself to it, but I look at all like an endless National Park. Or museum. A wholly immersive, quality place to visit and lose myself in, reliably. No need to move in or map it out in any more depth than whatever each individual jaunt wants to show me.
He's sometimes a bit too dialect-y for my liking. But hey, so's Chris Claremont. Or Robert Burns. Or Dickens, I guess. But he's still pretty easy to read. Easy as in accessible, not that it's simplistic. The themes of empire and identity and adventure are all dealt with sensitively and intelligently, if you have eyes (and heart) to see it.
~
Chimamanda really hit the big time a few years back, and it’s been interesting seeing her navigate the heights. As Ken Kesey once observed, those high-intensity celebrity spotlight beams can really throw a writer’s eye off. Or blind or otherwise bedazzle them. So far so good in Chimamanda's case, and fingers crossed.
I have not read more than this one collection of stories, but I’m getting there. The title story is the kind of thing often imitated/ often attempted, and is wonderful. Start there if you never have. Great details.
~
Sometimes you just need some old-school sci-fi. Myself I only need it in small portions spread out over a long enough timeline. Nothing against it, it’s just a very specific taste and production approach, like Old Time Radio or anything old school.
A few of these were gifted to the Omnibus a few years back by a buddy of mine who doesn't seem to read these blogs anymore, despite having more or less the exact same interests and writing me about the same topics in emails. Such confusion I will definitely not miss when I shrug off this blogging coil in thirty-three short days. I found the Merril one in one of the little free libraries in my neighborhood; come to think of it, I found a paperback of DC Fontana's novelization of The Questor Tapes in the same bin. Must be some sci-fi fan in the neighborhood.
John Wyndham wrote The Day of the Triffids and the Midwich Cuckoos and more, of course, but this book (and its companion volume, although I don’t have that one) should be its own season of BBC sci-fi. I wish they’d do some anthology TV show of all Wyndham’s works. Ditto for:
~
I don’t know if the science in “E= MC2” really makes sense, but it’s a hell of a story. Otherwise his short fiction is hit or miss to me. Truthfully some of his longer fiction, too, but when he was on, he was on. Everyone should read "E=MC2", though, and wrestle with both the science and its implications.
~
Tobias Wolff is great. Every story has a little something or one particular line or several.
"They painted through the morning and into the afternoon. Every now and then Mary Ann would back off a few steps and take in what they'd done. At first she kept her thoughts to herself. The more the painted the more she had to say. Toward the end she went out into the street and stood there with her hands on her hips. It's interesting, isn't it? Really different. I see what you mean about picking up the bricks. It's pretty red, though.
It's perfect.
Think my Dad'll like it?
Your Dad? He'll be crazy about it.
Think so, Gilbert? Really?
Wait til you see his face."
~
This guy got on my radar with In the Land of Israel, which someone had recommended to me when I first started to read up on Israel. Or maybe I just randomly picked it up, I don't know. That book’s more of a Studs Terkel sort of affair - and very eye-opening - whereas this one is a literary creation, i.e. straight fiction.
Like the state of Israel itself, an evocative blend of the ancient ("Upon This Evil Earth") and cutting-edge ("Strange Fire," "A Hollow Stone"). The more Israeli context you have the better, I guess, but I don't think you really need it. If you know how to read a short story, you'll get all the salient points and enjoy them all just the same. (Similarly, I don't know how much Nigerian context you need for Chimamanda, or French/twentieth century context for Boulle or Maurois, or nineteenth for Kipling or de Maupassant. But the more you have - in fiction as in life - the deeper your appreciation will be. Learn all that is learnable, folks.)
~
Well, that's a wrap. Here are two late arrivals, though, that I’ve yet to crack open.
(1) Never heard of Chaon (I think?) until now. However, that snippet of description sure makes me interested in seeing what he has to offer.
ReplyDelete(2) Wasn't that "Dark Forces" anthology supposed to be one of the standout publications (of its day, at least)? I know I'm thinking of some award winning Horror oriented anthology that is definitely not "Dangerous Visions".
(3) Matheson is turning out to be one of those authors of whom a hell of a lot more needs to be said. I've seen one or two scholarly studies, so there's that. Yet a lot more needs to be done. Hopefully I can add something to the conversation in the near future.
(4) I know De Maupassant is one of those types who started out as a general fiction author, and then ended up more as a Horror writer as he went on. I'm told he went crazy near the end, and that's where stories like "The Horla" came from.
I know so little else beyond this, that the situation is kind of reversed for me. I haven't even begun to dig into this writer, so it's all a matter of playing catch-up (again).
(5) As for F. Scott and Zelda, here's the idea they always put in my mind:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=er1SCSOaTb4
How accurate it is to it's literary book of the same name is a question I leave to others.
To be concluded.
ChrisC
Concluded from above.
ReplyDelete(6) Well, now i know where you learned about Kipling, at least. And why you knew so much about films like "Wee Willie Winkie". In terms of pure art, proper, the most interesting thing about his best work is that he always leaves more tantalizing hints lingering in the background.
I get the sense he could have been one of the great novel-length fantasists, if only he could have managed to devote the necessary work to it. Instead, the story engine he had to work with became the kind of vehicle that can only run so far, meaning that hints remain unwritten possibilities.
Nowhere is this more evident to me than with "The Jungle Book". It' clear to me that the great majority of the stories in both collections what to assemble themselves into chapters of a great, unwritten Indian Animal Fable. The trouble is it happened to lodge in the one literary mind that could never reach that level of scope, while always being doomed to dream about it.
As for the rest, I tend to think his was always a mind of divided loyalties. If he'd remained in India, things might have gone in a lot of different directions. He seems more like a man in need of some kind of guiding light, more than anything malicious. If that makes any sense.
(7) Here's an interesting question. Has Science Fiction entered a kind of on-going slump during these contemporary times? It's just that I haven't run across anything in the recent examples of the genre that come off as all that interesting. I have no idea why this should be the case, when there's no apparent reason why the genre shouldn't keep reaching for the starts.
The irony is this is something I tend to get more often from the older books in the field, the ones that are either forgotten or else considered discredited in many ways. I don't think more than a handful of reader and writer anywhere will ever know that someone like Murray Leinster existed, even if he is a pioneer of the genre.
That's sort of why it's gratifying to see that some out there are keeping these names alive, even it can only ever be a handful coterie at any given time, from now on. I think the problem is we've allowed the imagination of Sci-Fi to shrink over the years, and that might have been a terrible mistake. At least it says something wrong when someone like PKD seems more lively than any other offering on display at the moment.
That's sort of why I'd like to take this opportunity to recommend "The Way the Future Was" by Fred Pohl. It's his memoirs of the years he spent in the field. It's also something of a hidden commentary on where the genre was at that point in time (the banner year of 1977, when it all went mainstream) and where it had come from.
As a result, Pohl's book winds up taking stock of the genre, and has some good natured fun pointing out how it was always much more about fairy tales in space, rather than anything strictly predictive of things to come. It's a fact that guys like Dick would often satirize in their own work, which might account for why he still has some level of name recognition.
Pohl, however, seems content to take it in stride, and it's clear he's committed to Sci-Fi clunky prop spaceships and all. A good review of "The Way the Future" was can be found here:
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/2056342814?book_show_action=true&from_review_page=1
End of rant.
(8) Speaking of Dickens, if you can hold on for just a bit longer, a close look at what might be called a "symbolization" of that author's life and most famous work available by next Sunday at the "Club".
(9) Good to see someone keeping to Old Time Radio enthusiasm alive.
(10) All this talk of Sci-Fi has led me to leave this link of leftovers from an alternate Tower level where Moebius and Jodorosky went on to revolutionize the genre:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBktKOQGBYA
Sometimes even snippets of dreams are enough to get by on.
ChrisC.
Going backwards...
Delete(10) Interesting!
(7) I'll definitely have to look for that memoir. Science fiction has undergone many revolutions since the early days, to be sure. I don't know who's inspiring things now - so much work seems to be redundant, or even regressive. And yet: excellent work is being done in the genre (the BSG reboot, the Expanse (from what people tell me), Firefly, et al.) And even if these things are, like, 20 years old, there's a great deal of popular, engaging work. I think I personally gravitate just towards the old. I always like precedent. If something is pitched to me as "sounds like x," I'll always go hunt out the "x."
(2) I don't know how big of a deal "Dark Forces" was, but it should be - what a collection!
I still want to know what the hell happened between Kirby Macauley and Stephen King.
(1) I plan -- PLAN, mind you (following through is hard, planning is easy) -- to do something like this myself during the course of 2022. Specifically, I want to read all of King's short stories back-to-back-to-etc and do a ranking. But it's an honorable goal no matter whose work one is reading, and I might consider extending it beyond that project.
ReplyDeleteThis post won't dissuade me, I'd guess.
(2) "Stephen King once lamented in the intro to one of his collections that books of short stories rarely make the bestseller lists, and that seems true. Why, though?" -- My sense of it is that short stories primarily appeal to people who have at least a measure of literary interest in what they read. That's not most people, who are into reading for escapism. From their point of view, short stories are ephemeral and pointless. They don't really even count as reading.
(3) I've managed to never read a single thing by Octavia Butler, and I suspect I am much the poorer for it. See also Larry Niven.
(4) The only thing I've read by Dan Chaon is a story called "Little America" which was in a Bradbury-tribute anthology. I liked the book in general a lot, and his story was excellent. I don't remember a single thing about it, alas.
(5) Obviously I've read "The Mist" more than a few times, but I've never read "Dark Forces" itself. Hey, maybe I'll tackle that as an addendum to my King project!
(6) I read Fitzgerald in a few classes in college, and remember being surprised by liking his stories. I'd disliked "The Great Gatsby" in high school and wasn't expecting much. Mostly I just read Star Trek tie-in novels in high school, though, so what the fuck did I know? Almost literally nothing.
(7) I have no doubts that all the others I've failed to comment on are also well worth reading. Oh, the books I'll never read! It is maddening.
(7) I get that one! For sure.
Delete(6) I bet you'd like "Taps at Reveille" as a collection.
(5) I've read a couple more in there since writing this post, and so far each one's a gem. I still want to know all that happened between Kirby and Stephen, dang it. We'll likely never get that gossipy book about King's career that we get for so many other public figures. That's a shame!
(2) That makes sense, I guess, you'd just figure someone would find a way to market the genre to the ADHD crowd. But who knows. The industry is so upside down.
(1) That was my plan a few years back and I only made it through "Just After Sunset" before things changed, alas. I'd rather read your doing so, anyway. Those deep dives you were doing (I remember the ones on "Here There Be Tygers" and "The Glass House") were good, you need to get back to those. And the TOS reviews!
Easier said than done. When's a fella get his armchair-reading me-time!
(7) And how!, I expect.
Delete(6) One of my more urgent regrets for all the books I'll never read is that I've long nursed a desire to just tear my way through the bibliographies of all the acknowledged masters like Fitzgerald. Dickens, Hemingway, Faulkner, Kipling, etc. Line up centuries worth of the greatest literature and just mow 'em down one by one. Even if I end up disliking a fair portion of it, I'd enjoy the process. But hey, that old bald cheater cheats us all, so no need in fretting much over getting got like we all get got.
(5) Oh, I bet we get a bunch of gossipy books about King once he kicks the bucket, assuming he doesn't outlast all the people who'd be most likely to write them. And he probably will!
(2) Well, in many ways, I'd bet that's what most of the popular online writers are doing. Creepypastas and whatnot. I bet your average fanfic is short-story length. This does not seem to be leading to an uptick in appreciation for the writers represented in this post, though.
(1) I'd love to crank out more of those short-story deep dives, but since I'm cranking them out at a rate of one every two or three years, it feels untenable to continue to try to make that the focus. My current goal: focus 75% on the actual reading and only 25% (or less) on blogging about it.
That said, regarding TOS, prep work for "The Squire of Gothos" is currently underway. So I might be able to get back on track with those, at least!