4.10.2019

The Dark Tower Reread pt. 7: The Wind Through the Keyhole


These are things that happened, once upon a bye.”

Plot: (1) Between the events of Wizard and Glass and Wolves of the Calla, Roland and his ka-tet take shelter from a starkblast * in Gook, a deserted town on the Calla side of the river Whye. ** To pass the time until it's over, Roland tells them the tale of (2) when he and Jamie DeCurry *** were sent to trap a skin-man **** in Debaria. Within that tale, young Roland tells them the old Gilead children's tale The Wind Through the Keyhole: (3) Young Tim Stoutheart, on the dubious advice of the Covenant Man ***** travels far beyond his part of the world to find the magic drop that will restore his mother's eyesight. 

* wicked killer storm.
** don't worry about any of these names.
*** fellow Gunslinger of Gilead-that-was.
**** Shape-shifting Murderer.
***** Our old friend the Man in Black. 

Three stories in one, each section unfolding into the next, then back to the beginning, this little coda to the Dark Tower series came out in 2012, 8 years after King ended the Dark Tower tale in bk 7. And guess what? In almost every way that matters it's the best and most Dark Tower-iest book of them all. I don't reasonably know how to quantify such a claim - does it have NCP? Magic? Memorable characters and tragedies? A mix of adventure fantasy, sci-fi, and horror? Does it move forward or contribute to or clear up the overall epic mystery? All these things and more. And it ties together perhaps the most important theme of the entire series.

So maybe we should be seeing TWTTK atop more Dark Tower lists and not treated as some kind of (well-regarded nonetheless) afterthought. 

"Hile, Sir Throcken." - Roland's greeting to Oy, early on.
Just love the sound of it, particularly as a greeting for a small, Oy-like creature. Had I a pug or other small dog, I'd say this whenever he or she entered the room.

The author with Marlowe, a possible keystone-Earth version of Oy, last seen in bk 7.

Some bulletpoint-randoms before we get to the individual sections:

- Sort of a fan-service appearance for Walter. Does he seem like himself? Wonderfully so. Does his appearance make sense? Kind of? I mean, we learn Tim was a gunslinger of Gilead after all and even saw the Dark Tower (in some other tale we'll never get). The only issue it raises is - this is Roland telling this story, and Roland's mother telling it to him. Does this complicate the whole Roland/Gabrielle Deschain/ Marten palace intrigue, perhaps even fatally? I think so. it's a mistake to have Roland telling a story that has these sort of details about Walter, as well as an appearance by North Central Positronics. There is no indication in any other appearance of these things that these are things Roland has stored in memory from when he was a child in his mother's lap. 

When my friend Bryant and I palavered on this one during the original stretch of the King's Highway, we both made attempts to engage the larger King online community on this POV point. Neither of us got much for our troubles except some defensive discomfort for even even bringing it up. Ah well.


More importantly and back to the specific task at hand: who cares? Do you want this story without Marten Broadcloak? Or NCP? Of course not. If each book of the Dark Tower series was a movie, say, and made lots of money but won no awards, and if the same actor played the Man in Black throughout, this would be the one where he gets the legacy win for Best Supporting Actor. 


Not particularly enamored with Jae Lee's illustrations, in general or here in TWTTK. This will be the last of them I share. What the heck am I going to do for pictures?

Is it weird that he gives Tim so much aid, particularly with the items left at the dogan with Maerlyn? Who can figure this crazy asshole out? He does what it does, he do what he do. Presumably it was all part of the game of castles he played right up to his untimely end.


"The bugs are voracious flesh-eaters, but according to the old wives, they'll not eat the flesh of a virtuous man." 

So the MIB tells Tim when discovering his da's corpse in the river. (Near "yon pookey," but more on that momentarily.) What a bullshitter.


- I like that Daria can detect - and even distinguish between good and bad - magic. I like everything about Daria actually. After Andy, is there a malevolent robot we see in the series? We meet Nigel (in bk7) and the Algul Siento fire response team (not to mention Eddie's good-natured-enough grill in the cave) - they're not exactly lawful characters but they're not malevolent. And here's Daria, who is lawful. And lonely and loyal. Maybe King just felt bad about creating any more bad robots after Blaine and Andy and all the rest.

- Speaking of bad robots (sorry), is there just a tad bit of Lost in this book? Self-consciously so, I mean; obviously, there was a lot of Dark Tower in Lost itself. Along with just about everything else, sooner or later. All things serve the Beam. 

- Bix (the ferryman) got the "Z" from a NCP storehouse or museum of sorts. Sort of like finding new tombs to rob. I could read a whole book about the "Lost Tombs of the Old Ones" and the radioactive/ robot/ speaking-demon problems of digging them up. Or a tie-in book, done up like a fake encyclopedia or something. Man Jesus! The money, fortune, and storytelling glory these Dark Tower copyright holders leave on the table.

- It's cool to see Jamie DeMurray, the last of Roland's original band of gunslingers. He doesn't have too terribly much to do here, but that's okay. These Antilles Wedge sort of characters are just cool to have in the background (and not die). (EDIT: Please see comments.)


SOME RECURRING KING MOTIFS

"It made him feel like an icy visitor in his own head."


More bulletpoints, do it please ya.

- Even the mud people laugh so hard they have to hold on to each other to keep from falling over.

- King's hit or miss with some of these Roland-isms. "Jing jang" is great. Anyone want to go through all the books ever written and replace "telephone" with "jing jang?" Fine by me. I never much cared for "popkin," though, or much of the can-vas-ne-Gan-dinh-ka-mahfah stuff. But whatever - it comes with the epic fantasy territory. Then there's stuff like "pookey," the In-World slang for Giant Serpent in a Tree, which appears by my unofficial count something like 254 times in the novel's 336 pages. I wish I could understand King's brain sometimes.

- Big Kells. The ubiquity of this sort of villain in the King-verse is sometimes exasperating. You could say 'well, the ubiquity of this sort of man in the world' justifies it. Which is a point, I guess, just not one I find particularly persuasive for King's over-use of it. Like psionics holding hands in a circle softly goading characters to the next plot point, it's effective, I guess, but sometimes it's just repetitive. Not so much a criticism or fatal flaw just a here-we-go-again. 

All that aside: let's say Big Kells was the only such villain in the King ouevre. Very effective, very memorable, very satisfying to see him get the poetic justice we need from such fairy tales.

DARK TOWER STUFF

So, we learn that Roland ended the instructive days of Cort at Gilead. Sure hope the kingdom doesn't pay a price for losing the guy who teaches the gunslingers how to gunsling or anything...


"He can't catch anyone, Tim - he's himself caught, pent up at the top of the Dark Tower. But he has powers and he has his emissaries. The one you met is far from the greatest of them."  - Maerlyn on the CK.

The appearance of Maerlyn at the end of the saga was teased by King way back in The Gunslinger, and here we finally see him. Roland never does (that we know of) but close enough. Any discrepancies, and Maerlyn provides the answer. ("I was drunk," he tells Tim with some embarrassment.)

What do we learn of the mythos with Maerlyn here? He's fallible, of the White (i.e. of the lawful and Eld), he knows many things, and he may or may not be sending vague messages of help through space and time to counter-balance the insidious work of the Crimson King.

"Tim saw Maerlyn once more -" I read that and blocked thinking about it immediately. Oh no you don't, Sai King. Unh-unh. Fool me once way more than once.

KING METAFICTIVE COMMENTARY

I'm sure you're all familiar with Bryant Burnette's theory on The Dark Half, right? It's sketched out over a couple of posts over at The Truth Inside the Lie. The basic gist in his own words (from the comments here:) "Beaumont was so addicted to the things he was addicted to that he'd essentially invented a second personality under which to play in that world. Then, when he tried to go cold-turkey, that personality proved to be so potent that it took on a life of its own. Seems like a good metaphor. The fact that King was able to come up with so many different -- and useful -- ways of examining the same subject (addiction) is a bit of a wonder."

I think something similar is going on with the Crimson King in the Dark Tower books, how it all plays out. Roland is "good" King's twin, fighting his way past all the various hang-ups, tendencies, addictions, obstacles, guilts, and mistakes that the Crimson King put in his way, that the "good" King enabled, etc. (Think of Maerlyn, again, here, talking to Tim. The true man-behind-the-curtain speaks. Again.) It's this reason why the CK is offscreen and - as an actual character - extremely unsatisfying, and even why he's dispatched the way he is in bk7. He's an externalization of King's own dark half, and the entire Dark Tower journey is a million-word deconstruction of King's writing and life, metaphorically explored and served up to us.

Along these lines here are some thing specific to TWTTK:

- the "Starkblast." Do I need to remind you the name of Beaumont's alter ego in The Dark Half? What is a starkblast? A killer storm that will destroy everything in its path if one doesn't hunker down and find cover. King's written extensively on how his writing saves and renews him. How does the ka-tet wait out this storm? They pass the time in story. This fits with everything King has written about his writing and how it saved/ saves him from his addictions (and pain). I'm reminded of the liner notes to Johnny Cash's (amazing) Unchained, where he writes of his own struggles with staying sober. (paraphrased) "Sometimes at night, I still hear the wolf howl somewhere in the dark out there, and I want to go howl with him." But, he doesn't, he picks up his guitar and tells a story. 

And here, the connection between storytelling and salvation from/ attempted sabotage by the Crimson King is part of the plot, not just metaphorical window dressing. Fascinating stuff. I'll keep up this line of inquiry when I get to the other reviews but wanted to red-circle it (no pun intended).



- The demon in the mine in the skin-man section. ("It speaks to your face and tells you to come inside.") What does it do once you're inside? Changes you, physically and mentally, sets you on a destructive cycle that destroys all in its path and tears families apart. All the demons or dead machines (or thinnies) of Roland's world have this same message: come in, come in, come join us in the land of the dead. I suggest this is purposeful. The author has wisely positioned a gunslinger between himself and it. 

- Finally, at the end of the Skin Man tale, Roland receives a letter from his mother that basically absolves him of the considerable guilt he (understandably) carries for killing her. Chronologically this is all happening before we ever meet Roland in bk1, but publication-wise, this is the last word of the Dark Tower saga. It ends on a note of maternal reconciliation, of solace. This is not just important, it could be the point of the entire thing. I mentioned last time that King seemed to be processing both the death of his mother and some of the lingering effects of childhood in "Low Men in Yellow Coats" and (via Roland) in the Dark Tower books in general. 

In the Tim Stoutheart story, what motivates young Tim's quest? Believing the lies of one indifferent, trickster father, he wants to save his mother from another untrue father, who murdered his true father, rendering him absent. Is this the projection of King's childhood? It is, for what it's worth, a common fantasy of children in fatherless homes. Whatever, though, back to the mama - how does Tim get home after he meets (and rescues - that's important) a benevolent (though equally absent) father figure? He closes his eyes and says the magic words: "How I miss you, mama." This simplest and purest of truths, all artifice stripped away, is the redemptive magic. 

I've got to tell you, I got really teared up at this, this time around. If you picture King spending a good portion of the years since sobering up reprocessing many of the things blocked out from the years under the starkblast of drugs and alcohol, there's a hell of a lot of weight in this one line. He referred to Roadwork as his contemporaneous attempt to process his mother's death. I think he got a lot closer in "Low Men in Yellow Coats" and closest of all here. This is the true fairy tale end to both the Dark Tower and to King's long-delayed roadwork.


THE SKIN MAN


I didn't want to end on a completely sappy - though wonderfully earned and pivotal to all things - note, so here's a parting observation from Roland from the Skin Man saga: 


"I'd seen such mealy white flesh before. It was brains. Human brains."


~

17 comments:

  1. I would say the point of the series almost becomes about Roland forgiving himself, but not quite getting there at the end. Him screaming the names of his lost friends and family at the end of book 7 feels like him trying to say it was all worth it but ultimately not believing it. There's a chance he can, but to truly move on and forgive himself will be a lot longer than he would want. This book ending on a note of forgiveness and solace to me is King saying Roland will redeem himself in the end. Its impressive that a spin off mid-quel thing can also serve as a fitting end to the series thematically.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You say true, I say thankya.

      I wonder if King's been working on the next incarnation of Roland's journey to the Tower. Hell, he only has to change a few paragraphs here and there and add another couple of hundred pages. It's doable. For him, especially.

      Delete
    2. This whole post has me thinking how reflective this era of King is in general. From 2011 on we have 11.22.63, Doctor Sleep, Joyland, Revival and this book here. All have a looking back on it all quality. Even Mr. Mercedes is based in a genre King has loved his whole life. King tends to me at least be at his best when he is more introspective, and I would say this era has led to a few gems because of it.

      Delete
  2. (1) "I like that Daria can detect - and even distinguish between good and bad - magic."

    Me: ....?????

    "I like everything about Daria actually."

    Me:...Something tells me I should know that name, though I'm not sure why (to myself, I think this).

    "After Andy, is there a malevolent robot we see in the series?"

    Me: Oh yeah! "I'm water-proof". The punchline is I remembered the character/device, yet the name totally slipped my memory. I think the main reason is because tend to view machines as just that, and nothing more. For instance, in "Wall-E" I find myself more concerned for the Captain and the rest of people on the ship more than the two main leads.

    Still, I like Daria just fine.

    (2) Some very interesting stuff to think over here re: the ultimate meaning of the series. In fact, you might have given me some other ideas worth thinking about. I'd prefer to save all that for now, though.

    (3) Jamie DeMurray. It's De Curry, actually. And it's Wedge Antilles, not the other way around.

    (4) On the whole, if I have to have a favorite out of all the Tower books, then this might have to fill the closest I'll ever have to a number 1 slot with this series.

    It just seems the most well written, featuring the best storyline and a cast of characters colorful enough to make a worthwhile read.

    I also think it helps serve as a useful bridge for readers as a demarcation point. The way to look at it seems to be to view volumes one through four as static pictures. "Keyhole" marks the point where the figures in those pictures begin to stir, come to life, and climb out of the frames.

    It's only a short step from there to the total meta-fiction of the last three volumes.

    ChrisC

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. (2.1) Almost forgot. You're thoughts on the big thematics of King's family life (and/or lack thereof) in relation to the Tower mythos put reminded me of another story that shares similar traits.

      I'm thinking of J.M. Barrie's/Disney's/Spielberg's "Peter Pan". A lot of themes in that story seem to almost match up with what you say about King's work on the "Tower" (albiet once they've been run through several rinse cycles, give or take a few).

      This is even evident in the fact that Flagg has found his own perverted version of Tinkerbell.

      Just interesting food for thought.

      ChrisC

      Delete
    2. "Jamie DeMurray. It's De Curry, actually. And it's Wedge Antilles, not the other way around. "

      I fixed that twice and my edits didn't save! Sheesh. In both cases I remembered it the way it is, up there, but looked them up and saw I was wrong. But I guess my changes didn't save. I thank you for correcting the record, sincerely.

      Delete
    3. That is fascinating re:Barrie/ Peter Pan - particularly that connection between Flagg and his tinkerbell here.

      Delete
  3. (1) "In almost every way that matters it's the best and most Dark Tower-iest book of them all." -- Sacrilege! Delicious, delicious sacrilege. I'd never given this possibility much thought, but now that it's been brought up, I have to admit: as an idea, I don't hate it. Looking at my own most recent rankings, I have it at next to last ahead of VI. After reading this awesome review, I'd probably put it at fifth, behind the first four.

    But what this review brings into focus for me is the strong possibility that this might be the clearest and most pure of all the books; mayyyyyyybe the first one still wins out, but only maybe.

    Either way, it's a damn fine piece of work; a late-career (or, for all I know it might turn out to be from King's late middle period!) home-run.

    (2) "Does this complicate the whole Roland/Gabrielle Deschain/ Marten palace intrigue, perhaps even fatally?" -- Great question. I suppose there's always the tantalizing possibility that every book might be set during a different cycle, therefore allowing for mild -- and not so mild -- deviations like this. This is the sort of thing that I'd probably be fuming about on "Star Trek: Discovery," but here, I'm inclined to just shrug and carry on loving all eight of these books. Even if it turns out that King just fucked it all up, I kind of don't care. I am a hypocrite of the highest order!

    (3) I could live without some of Lee's illustrations (including the one you posted), but there are several that I flat-out love. Same with some of his comics work on the Marvel Dark Tower series. But my taste for his work kind of petered out around the time this novel was released. Still, I hate the fact that none of the mass-market editions of the novel include his art. That's colossal bullshit, given that trade editions of the series novels all include art.

    (4) "I like everything about Daria actually." -- Daria is awesome.

    (5) I don't think I'd ever seen that orange-covered edition before. I love it.

    (6) "Even the mud people laugh so hard they have to hold on to each other to keep from falling over." -- King does love that device, doesn't he? Bless his heart. I hope he gets involved in one of those back-slap-and-gut-bust-athons at least once a week.

    (7) Man, I'd forgotten all about telephones being called "jing jang"s. That is [insert sound of chef kiss here].

    (8) Did I ever mention my theory about Maerlyn? Maybe, but I don't recall doing so. Anyways, I hate fan theories, as you know; but, being as I am a hypocrite, it doesn't stop me developing one of my own from time to time. My theory: Maerlyn is actually a very aged Ted Brautigan, who has somehow time traveled into the distant past and taken on the role. And then he somehow also becomes the Turtle. Hey, I didn't say it made any sense!

    (9) This notion of Roland and the Crimson King being the dual/dueling sides of King's own psychological makeup (or however you'd describe what they represent) is pretty damn great. You've dug deep here, and come up with a fistful of what sure looks to me like gold.

    (10) Damn, man. I don't think I ever connected starkblasts with George Stark, because I was too busy thinking of Ned Stark and winter-is-coming type stuff. But of course it can be applied in a "Dark Half" way! Awesome.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. (11) "What does it do once you're inside? Changes you, physically and mentally, sets you on a destructive cycle that destroys all in its path and tears families apart." -- At this point, I really just need you to record an audiobook version of this post so that I can then record a commentary track for it. By this point, all you'd be getting was frequent "ooh"s and "ah"s of a deeply impressed type.

      (12) "It ends on a note of maternal reconciliation, of solace. This is not just important, it could be the point of the entire thing." -- I'd definitely felt the notion that this novel kind of culminated the Tower saga, if only as regards this major subplot pertaining to Roland's motivations. But I had NOT considered the way in which it might be said to serve as a culmination of a major aspect of King's overall work. Very cool.

      (13) "I've got to tell you, I got really teared up at this, this time around." -- Damn near got me, just reading this post. Good stuff.

      As is this entire post. Well done!

      Delete
    2. (1) I've got to re-rank the King books one of these days. So many projects, so little time.

      (2) We covered this one pretty extensively in our original back and forth on this book, but rereading it renewed my interest in the problem. That it IS a problem and seems to never have been brought up by anyone by us is kind of remarkable. I mean, all you have to do is go and read the first appearances of NCP in the series and see how Roland reacts. There is no - and there would be, even if, as Roland himself allows, he's forgotten about the book and hasn't thought of it in years; in THAT case, after he finished telling the story, he (or one of the ka-tet) would undoubtedly remark upon it - recognition.

      I had an idea about that "next level of the cycle" stuff, kind of hinted at up there in one of my comment-replies. I think King should write out the next cycle, make it parallel the first 4 or 5 books very closely and then slowly go its own way. Without telling anyone except his publisher. For some new edition of al the books. Then people would get them and get to bk 6 or whatever and say hey, this sounds different... it would be a great surprise/ great fun. And it would be funny to see all the reviews come out from reviewers who don't actually read the books - or who would rely on their "first" read to write the review of the new editions.

      It'll never happen, but it'd be a cool trick.

      (3) Me and Jae Lee don't see eye to eye on anatomy, detail, choosing the right face for the panel/ dialogue/ action/ reality, or just about anything else. I do agree that the publishers make some spotty choices when it comes to their reprints/ other editions.

      (6) I think about that sometimes. The things I identify as repetitive in King's work: what if that's just his life? Everyday he has one of these laughing spells, everyday he goes to get milk from the fridge and Tabby and whomever are holding hands, eyes closed, while they whisper into his brain, they all go next door to stop an abusive husband, they witness cartoonish racism, then a huge storm blows up the town. Each and every day. It would explain a lot.

      (9) thru (13) Much obliged. I'm up in bk 7 now getting near the end and this theory has taken some different turns based on events/ dialogue in bk 7, but I still think overall-wise, King is definitely deconstructing himself in this series.

      Delete
    3. (1) Don't I know it. My current King-blogging project is to read and review a trio of behind-the-scenes books by Lee Gambin (one on Cujo, one on Christine, and one on the admittedly-non-King The Howling), and I simply cannot make any headway beyond where I am now. Finished the Cujo book (excellent) and have the other two just staring me in the face, asking what's up. And what's up is, too much stuff going on! Anyways.

      (2) Never say never. And yeah, that'd be a heck of a stunt -- that in and of itself might make it appealing to him. Rewrites that are actually sequels! Hell of a concept.

      (6) This is probably more accurate than it might seem at first glance. For all writers, I'd imagine. Even if not literally true, some of it is probably aspirational.

      Delete
  4. (8) Ummmmmm......Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh-kay?
    I have to admit that is pretty darned amusing, though.

    (12) My own approach is to look at it as multi-valent in terms of its relation to the rest of the "Tower" books. On the one hand, it can just be a part of the pre-established seven book cycle that we've know since the early 2000s.

    On the other hand, it is possible to see it as perhaps an intimation of the culmination of a long awaited reconciliation.

    This multi-valent aspect might just be one potential hallmark that singles "Keyhole" out as the best of the series.

    (13) Bryan,

    It'll be interesting to hear what aspects of your thinking has changed in terms of the series ending.

    ChrisC

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. (8) Oh yeah I forgot to comment on that - that's one I'd never considered! I like how he becomes the Turtle, too. Excellent.

      Delete
    2. (8) And he gives the kids in "It" the help he gives them because they remind the parts of his mind that are still somewhat human of the summer he had with Bobby Garfield and Carol and Sully John! Yeah! This bullshit is coming together, man. I need to find a way to fold that into my mostly-fallow Trek/Tower crossover fanfic. Alternatively, I really, really need NOT to find a way to do that.

      Delete
  5. Bryan,

    That "Ready Player One" review I mentioned is online today.

    http://www.scriblerusinkspot.com/2019/04/descent-into-escapism-problem-of-ready.html

    ChrisC.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm very happy I could be of service on both the information and the inspiration. I'm a pretty inspirational and informative guy, I guess. Just the other day the guy who delivered our food said the same. I took the pizza and gave him a blessing and sent him on his way, inspired and informed.

    I had to reply to this one because as spambot replies go, "Usama La-dee-la" is a pretty awesome name.

    (If anyone needs me to say it: obviously do not click on the link Mr./Ms. La-dee-la has provided.)

    ReplyDelete
  7. I find that in many situations, it is the deliverer of pizza who is providing the most useful information. Therefore it is very pleasing that in your recent experiences, it has been YOU, the one to whom the pizza was delivered, who has provided the most useful information.

    Truly inspirational, indeed!

    ReplyDelete