3.12.2019

The Dark Tower Reread Pt. 4: Wizard and Glass


The first time I read this I really loved it. As is becoming something of a pattern * though, this time around I was conflicted. There's around a 70/30 split on loved-it-to-indifferent on Goodreads. The ones who love it really love it. I counted myself among those until this reread. ** I didn't read anything in the negative-to-indifferent reviews that really resonated with me, though, so away we go. ***



I refer here to my last post, but I write these words after having finished Wolves of the Calla and spoiler alert, same deal there. Hopefully by the time I get to that post, I'll come up with new opening remarks.



** Ray Benson was among the indifferent, with a 2-star rating. Not to call him out for it or anything, just I'd love to hear his take on it, wish he'd left a review.


*** Well, I was going to away-we-go either way, wasn't I? Even had I found one that I agreed with 100%, can't just link to a review and say "ditto." Not on a King's Highway Todash Tunnel Big Dig Reread.

EVERYTHING PRE-MEJIS

The novel picks up where it left off, with the ka-tet screaming along in Blaine the Mono on a suicide run to Kansas, winner of the riddling take all. And... Eddie Star Treks it? Blaine would really be vulnerable to this? I get that his circuits have deteriorated and all but sheesh. He mentions some 60s TV, even - there's not one running file in all his dipolar-gazillion-load of circuits that grokked the not especially complex lessons of "I, Mudd"? (You can't tell me whomever programmed him wasn't a TOS fan. And Blaine's exceeded his original programming, to boot; you telling me a psychotic eternal train isn't going to watch TOS start to finish to wile away its time? No way, little pard.

I wish King had developed the getting-some-details-wrong path, such as when Blaine scrambles some details about his 60s shows and gets miffed at Jake innocently correcting him. But hell, even that's "The Changeling." I'd have preferred it had he opted for "Return of the Archons," if TOS was really the only option.

"HATE... FORRRRRR...."

Beyond that, though, it just didn't land with me. Eddie tells some lame jokes, and Blaine goes "AAAAAAAA!!" And before that he was just laughing and laughing (ahem, "Wolf in the Fold") which grew irritating. It was a real let-down from the Blaine we see at the end of The Waste Lands.

I'm leaving out the resonance of Charlie the Choo Choo in the above, it's true. The twinning/ka/vague-multidimensional-clues thing is very much part of the Dark Tower experience. On that score, I'd have preferred it had Blaine and Jake discussed Beryl Evans instead of Bewitched or whatever it was. I'm reading these sentences over and wishing I'd taken better notes because (a) do Jake and Blaine discuss Beryl Evans? Am I totally blanking on that? and (b) what the hell was it that Blaine gets wrong, was it the Mike Hammer/ Bewitched connection? If my copy of this wasn't way the hell over there, I'd check.

Before Blaine's improbable breakdown, Jake wonders why the monorail felt "such despair, such bitterness, such anger? Because he's a pain, that's why. Blaine is a really BIG pain." FFS Jake. This little mantra keeps getting offered as if it's some kind of profound thing to say. I fixed it.

"Because he's a pain, that's why." Silence filled the car, except for the very light hum of Blaine's air circulations. "Blaine is a really BIG -"
Roland's gun flashed from its holster so fast that even Blaine's internal sensors had trouble tracking it. The sound of the hand cannon was deafening in the Barony couch. Jake's chest exploded against the translucent windows, and a disinfectant/ brain-and-bone-matter-splatter program automatically kicked in. The rest of his body fell to the floor, and his leg kicked out the god-drums of "Velcro Fly." Roland holstered his weapon.
"WELL-PLAYED, GUNSLINGER OF GILEAD," came Blaine's booming voice. "YOU AND YOUR FRIENDS CAN LIVE." 
 "I mean, really, he just should have stopped saying it," said Eddie. He shook his head. Susannah reached over to squeeze his hand.
"You said it, sug," said Susanna.
"Tim-may!" said Oy. 
"FOR DOING THIS FAVOR, I AM SWITCHING TRACKS IN TOPEKA. WHAT WAS ONCE MY TERMINUS POINT HAS BEEN MODIFIED TO BRING YOU ALL THE WAY TO THE DARK TOWER ITSELF."
"TIM-MAY!" said them all.

As for the Captain Trips sideways-level of The Stand part of things, and the introduction of the thinny, I liked all of that. I chuckled when I saw the Kansas City Monarchs part. I'm developing a theory about this whole Dark Tower series and King's metafiction in general. It's still in the oven, but it's coming along and I'll share it in good time, say true. But these little author's-surname/allusions he makes throughout his career (most notably, I guess, in Castle Rock, but also here in this series with the big screaming red baddie waiting for Roland at the Tower) are fun. Here, of course, there actually was a Kansas City Monarchs team, and it's a perfectly legit and non-metafictional way of distinguishing this level of the Tower from the one we saw in The Stand. But: all things serve the Beam. 




AIN'T NO REAPING LIKE A MEJIS REAPING
'CAUSE A MEJIS REAPING DON'T STOP
(UNTIL SOMEONE IS BURNED AT THE STAKE)

The bulk of the book is Roland's telling his ka-tet of when he was a young gunslinger and sent to Hambry, the Barony seat of Mejis, and of the intrigue he found there: the town's leaders in cahoots with John Farson, the Good Man, that insurgent promising justice and an end to Gilead's oppression, etc. but who is really stacking heads on pikes and rolling up oil tankers from the still-active pumps at "Citgo," just outside town) and his tragic love affair with Susan Delgado, a comely young lass set to be the Mayor's side-wife come Reaping, the big barn dance of the Mejis social calendar.

I still found this part of the novel to be quite strong. It's more than Roland's story - it's also Susan's, and she's a good and well-sketched out character in King's catalog. And not just her but her aunt and - especially - Rhea, the old crone witch who plays a pivotal role in Roland's mother's sorrowful end. Wizard and Glass was written in the midst of King's feminist phase (so-called, i.e. compact-for-women's-flesh, ownership-vs-appropriation-of-vaginas, snake-dildoes, you name it), and he clearly took pains to sketch out the inner worlds of all the female characters of the tale. He succeeds well - you even sympathize with Rhea and Susan's aunt, for thy father's sake, and they're awful people who do awful things. Well done.

Does the series need a Peyton Place smack dab in the middle of it? Maybe not. Or maybe not as much of one as what we get. The story - not just Wizard and Glass but the Dark Tower series - might have been better served by excising just some of it (100 pages of cuts, maybe, though don't ask me which.) This is a very mild objection; I still quite like all the Mejis stuff. (Is there a bit too much about lady bits? Especially Rhea's? OMG yes. Animal abuse added to her crimes! )

These images are all by Dave McKean. Pretty weird stuff.

King gives himself the storytelling 'out' of Roland's time in the glass, which I'll get to momentarily, but that allows King-the-writer to ditch the Roland's POV restraint and spend several hundred pages on things Roland never saw or in the minds of characters Roland could not ordinarily peek.

While this invention (Roland's time in the Pink Glass as they escape Mejis) is both perfectly Dark-Tower-y and also pretty cool, it does metaphorically serve as a drug binge. Which is an ever so slightly off note for me, for Roland. King sometimes has trouble resisting inserting himself into his stories. This is ironic considering what's coming in the series; King's story is inextricably linked with Roland's, and not just metaphorically. The writer's experiences are reciprocal to Roland's and vice versa.

"Those in the grip of a strong drug - heroin, devil grass, true love - often find themselves trying to maintain a precarious balance between secrecy and ecstasy as they walk the tightrope of their lives. Keeping one's balance on a tightrope is difficult under the soberest of circumstances; doing so while in a state of delirium is all but impossible. Cuthbert and Alain watched Roland's descent into addiction first with disbelief, envy, and uneasy amusement, then with a species of silent horror."


Jonas, DePape, Reynolds, aka "The Big Coffins Hunters," are all fine. You've seen all of these villains before in King's work, as well as Rimer (another 'impossibly tall' man in King's Rogue's Gallery) but they're all effective. Jonas, the failed gunslinger, is that shadowy reflection of the protagonist that every good adventure story needs. (Roland makes pretty quick work of him, all told.)

I know that developments in the next book kind of negate this a little, but is it a little too much to have both Sauron's Eye (the CK's sigil) AND the "my precioussssss'ness" of the glass? It's just interesting to me that he set out to deliberately distance himself from Tolkien but so specifically evoke these two things here.


As with the Guardians it would be cool if there were other tales of the Glass. "Some colors of the Wizard's Rainbow are reputed to look into the future. Others look into the other worlds - those where the demons live, those where the Old People are supposed to have gone when they left our world. These may also show the location of the secret doors which pass between the worlds. Other colors, they say, can look far in our own world, and see things people would as soon keep secret. They never see the good: only the ill." 


EVERYTHING POST-MEJIS

I'm afraid I was pretty negative on all the post-Mejis stuff. Not the stuff in Gilead, with the tragic end of Roland's mother. I didn't quite care for Roland's flying "in the gale" stuff inside the glass, but the Gilead stuff was the twist that deepened Roland's story and justified its place here in the series.

The same cannot be said of the Wizard of Oz stuff, though. It works for a minute, when they point out the similarities or Roland's tale/ their surroundings to Oz. And then, starting with the shoes and getting worse once Oy has to don them - and sinking ever tediously further once the Tick Tock Man is playing the part of the wizard, apparently indulging that inner theater nerd he never got to indulge underneath Lud - it doesn't work at all. For me anyway. The novel takes such a committed and in my eyes improbable turn into this Wizard of Oz stuff and then comments on itself doing it, for far too many pages.

The MIB mentions - after the Tick Tock Man's acting the part of the Wizard and after the ka-tet shoots him - that he probably made a mistake to rescue him for Lud. Truth. It made no sense at the end of The Waste Lands and goes nowhere here. Nor does it make sense - what the hell is Wizard of Oz to the Tick Tock Man? Or to the MIB for that matter? If he's creating tangible emerald castles that straddle both worlds (for the people of the Calla see it too, in the next book), he can't create something more formidable to stop Roland's quest? 

And why drop them back down on the Path of the Beam on their way to Thunderclap, with a picnic basket no less? FFS he could've just left them in Stand-variant Kansas, likely to die of Captain's Trips. Was he worried they'd make their way to Mother Abigail's? I could use the hey-that’s-what-they-tried-this-time excuse i.e. maybe Walter and the CK have tried to strand them all a thousand times and they thought hey, this time, how about a nice gift basket and a polite note? But like challenge flags or timeouts (or a reader's patience) there's only so many times one can draw from that well. 

All told, the MIB is conveniently stupid (or helpful) when he needs to be.

And what the hell happens to the glass? Why didn't they just destroy it and that's how they get back to Mid-World (somehow)? King keeps its fate ambiguous, but it never shows up again. And neither does Rhea. Seems like there's some tale, there, King was keeping for a rainy day but as of this writing, we haven't gotten it.

IN CLOSING 

A solid sci-fi western fantasy coming of age story, with many characters masterfully blended, bookended by stuff I didn't much care for. 


Let's take some quick stock of things. Reading-wise, I've finished Wolves of the Calla, "The Little Sisters of Eluria," "Everything's Eventual," "Low Men in Yellow Coats," "Heavenly Shades of Night Are Falling," and I'm about halfway through The Wind Through the Keyhole. I'm procrastinating starting the last two books, as they're long-ass books, my memory of them was negative, and I'm just dragging my feet. I'm also circling Insomnia. That one's long, too, though. But very rewarding if memory serves.

Anyway it'll all materialize sooner or later. Of the books we've looked at so far, my first attempt at ranking the Dark Tower books had Wizard and Glass at number one, The Waste Lands at five, Drawing of the Three at six, and The Gunslinger at three. This time around it looks like this: (4) The Waste Lands, (3) Wizard and Glass, (2) The Drawing of the Three, and (1) The Gunslinger. 

Who knows what re-rankings await on when I read these books for a third time? Tune in come 2025 to find out!

14 comments:

  1. 1. I didn't mind the Blaine/Eddie interactions. However, that's not saying much as far as I'm concerned. I'll explain why in a minute.

    2. "I'm developing a theory about this whole Dark Tower series and King's metafiction in general. It's still in the oven, but it's coming along and I'll share it in good time, say true."

    Sounds interesting. Look forward to it.

    3.If I'm being honest, this whole thing might be my least favorite among the entire series. It just comes off sounding like a dull affair. I don't know, maybe it's a lack of forward momentum, though I think there's a more fundamental reason. As this reason has to do with the series as a whole, I still plan to hold back on that until maybe this whole thing is wrapped up.

    4. To end on a positive note. I found this trailer for a Sergio Leone film, and I couldn't help but wonder if this provides an interesting snapshot of what would have happened to Jake if events had taken a brighter path:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RYq1PLdT0s

    ChrisC

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 3. I look forward to hearing about your reason. Target date for completion: May-ish. There will be water if God wills it.

      4. I've never seen MY NAME IS NOBODY; I need to rectify that one of these days. Actually, that's not true, come to think of it, my buddy had it on DVD, I think, and threw it on one time. Could it have come out on laser disc? If so, it was a laser disc, not DVD, but I think this same friend had all of the Sergio Leone at-that-time available on laser disc, and I'm fairly sure this wasn't one of those. Ah, the hazy past.

      At any rate, I'm liking the idea of Jake actually growing into a gunslinger, on some level of the Tower, and seeing that movie/ reading that book, more than the Jake we get here.

      Delete
  2. (1) I definitely count myself among the 70% who love it. It's been a while since I myself reread it, though, so who knows? These things are always a negotiation between past-self, current-self, and future-self. At least with me they are.

    That said, if I am negative on this book the next time I read it, it's going to bum me out.

    (2) "And... Eddie Star Treks it?" -- He really does pull a Kirk on Blaine, doesn't he? I love all of that. I personally have no qualms whatsoever about the resolution of the cliffhanger. Loved it then, love it still. (We'll see when I reread it, though.) As for Blaine getting details wrong, I wonder if that's not him accidentally pulling answers from other dimensions. Maybe the answers ARE correct, just not on that particular level of the Tower.

    (3) "This little mantra keeps getting offered as if it's some kind of profound thing to say. I fixed it." -- This whole section is priceless; that's a pretty good King pastiche you're rockin' there.

    I agree, Jake's mantra is annoying. I don't think it bothers me as much as it bothers you, though. But this sort of thing is not one of the better aspects of King's writing, no doubt about it.

    (4) " "TIM-MAY!" said them all. " -- LOL

    (5) "I'm developing a theory about this whole Dark Tower series and King's metafiction in general. It's still in the oven, but it's coming along and I'll share it in good time, say true." -- I love a good guarantease, and this is a great one.

    (6) I'm glad the extended flashback (i.e., the bulk of the novel) still mostly worked for you. That's some of my favorite King of all.

    (7) You know, it hadn't really occurred to me that "Wizard and Glass" could be counted as belonging to King's "feminist phase," but now that you've pointed it out, it makes sense. I wonder what brought that whole phase on. I quite like that era of King books, so whatever it was, I'm grateful for it.

    (8) "Roland makes pretty quick work of him, all told." -- I always loved that. King spends most of the novel kind of building up the idea -- if only indirectly -- that there will be this big, mostly-evenly-matched confrontation, but then...? Nope. Roland just smokes his punk ass. That just makes Roland that much cooler to me.

    (9) "As with the Guardians it would be cool if there were other tales of the Glass." -- I think maybe one of the most legitimate criticisms of the series is that King establishes a large number of awesome plot elements in the worldbuilding, but follows through on so very few of them. Better that than developing them and having them result in something that sucks -- lookin' at you, Crimson King -- though, I guess. But I'd still love for there to be more. More from King himself, that is; the comics do give a bit more of some of this stuff, and it's very hit or miss. Mostly miss.

    (10) "The same cannot be said of the Wizard of Oz stuff, though." -- My memory of this entire section is kind of blank. I don't remember disliking it, but I don't remember being in love with it, either; which I am with the vast majority of the book. So in other words, I suspect I pretty much would agree with all your thoughts on this section. I definitely remember Tik-Tok being a letdown; which is a foreshadowing of greater letdowns to come, arguably.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. (11) "And why drop them back down on the Path of the Beam on their way to Thunderclap, with a picnic basket no less?" -- Isn't the idea that the MIB/Flagg actually using Roland in the hopes of having him take out the Crimson King (and/or vice-versa) so that he himself can then seize control by having fewer combatants to contend with? Something like that is what's in my mind, at least. It's all too vague, though. The novels simply are not satisfying in this regard. That's fine in one sense (the plotting isn't why I love them), but very much not fine in another.

      (12) " And what the hell happens to the glass? Why didn't they just destroy it and that's how they get back to Mid-World (somehow)? King keeps its fate ambiguous, but it never shows up again. And neither does Rhea. Seems like there's some tale, there, King was keeping for a rainy day but as of this writing, we haven't gotten it." -- Agreed. Rhea almost HAS to show back up at some point. I wonder if King would have done so if not for the car accident; the changes that accident suggested may well have steered the story down another path and away from the one which would have included Rhea. We may never know!

      (13) "I'm about halfway through The Wind Through the Keyhole" -- I look forward to hearing about this. I kind of already have, of course; but I'm curious to know how/if it holds up for you.

      Delete
    2. (11) Just remembered something about the Tower Topeka. For the longest time now I've thought that Roland's world is really just that of "The Stand" several thousand years down the road, or so.

      This perspective has the added bonus of explaining why Flagg is in Trips America in the first place if the Crimson King sent him back in time to establish a beach-head, so to speak. I just think that take makes for a more coherent and unified narrative than otherwise.

      Besides that, yeah, I think Bryant does make a good point. I think Flagg and the King are each trying to one up each other on who gets to the Tower first and either destroys it (the King), or else tries to use to rule everything (Flagg). On that level, King seems to be borrowing a plot element from " The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly", where you have three antagonists each trying to get to the goal at once, and always trading places as allies and enemies.

      ChrisC.

      Delete
    3. Bryant:

      (8) I agree completely.

      (11) This makes sense to me. I'll have to see what I think after bk 7. It might have helped had the Crimson King been characterized at all. "He's insane and wants to break the Beams" is kind of all I remember. So if there's more to it than that, even, I'll be happy.

      (12) There's still time! I hope he decides to do it.

      (13) So far, I love it. I'm about 100 pages from the end now, right after Tim and Daria leave the mudpeople. I look forward to digging back into our palaver on that one.

      ChrisC:

      (11) A Stand-variant world with a Dark Tower crossover is a pretty cool idea to develop, I think.

      Delete
    4. One interesting factor of this particular fan theory is that it's possible that Stu Redman is really who everyone talks about when they mention Arthur Eld, or just "The Eld".

      ...I'll go take my meds now.

      ChrisC.

      Delete
    5. It has its kinks to work out - most notably the lack of NCP in The Stand, proper - but a) if it's a Stand-variant timeline, then no worries, and b) where there's a will, there's a way.

      Delete
    6. Oh and Bryant re: your (2) remark: I think you're right in that Blaine's scrambling details from various levels of the Tower. I'd liked to have seen that exploited more rather than the dead-baby-crossing-the-road stuff. it just didn't seem realistic that something like Blaine/ Lud-super-city would be so fatally confused / defeated by such.

      if anything, had Eddie started riffing through, let's say, 40 different alternate endings to "City on the Edge of Forever", THAT could have led to the fatal "I, Mudd" moment more justifiably in my humble opinion.

      From perusing the pages on this subject out there, I'm in an extreme minority on this end-of-Blaine not working for them. But hey, I'm used to that.

      Delete
    7. You're probably right about Blaine going out too easy in this scene. I'd have to reread it all from that perspective to mount a proper defense of it. Or fully agree with you, as the case may be!

      Delete
  3. While I would still rate this as the best book in the dark tower series, I would agree that it is because of the mejis section that this book is great and that the present narrative is comparatively weak. I find kings writing so strong and great in this book (and indeed the first four all together) that I'm willing to overlook the wizard of oz shit that to me is a bizarre choice. I feel in general with the early dark tower books you can feel king's joy in writing these books that they overcome their flaws. That doesn't mean there isn't flaws, or that the joy seems to be gone by book 6 or 7 leading to a much worse written ending. But what we got is what we got, and what we got isn't half bad (mostly).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think that's a good way of looking at it.

      I'll be obsessing over the flaws just the same! But that's more on me than on King, if that makes any sense.

      And yeah, the Mejis section is definitely some of King's best work, not just for Dark Tower but all around.

      Delete
  4. Having recently finished a relisten to the audio version of this, I'm going to vomit up some additional thoughts:

    (1) Just as I'm revisiting this post to see what I think, I also relistened to the episodes of the Stephen King Cast on this novel. He's a huge fan, which is fine by me. But I wanted to mention something he points out regarding the Dave McKean art. The image of Roland's mother at the window, he contends, does not depict Gabrielle Deschain. Instead, it depicts ... Willie Nelson. And holy shit, I think he may be right.

    (2) "sinking ever tediously further once the Tick Tock Man is playing the part of the wizard, apparently indulging that inner theater nerd he never got to indulge underneath Lud" -- I kind of got the feeling that ol' Ticky might by this point have been basically just a meat puppet through which Flagg was speaking. I don't know that that makes this section any better, though. As you suggest, none of it really makes a lick of sense. It does sort of establish the intertextuality / metafictiveness which ramps up in "Wolves of the Calla," but since that aspect of the books is not exactly my favorite aspect, I can't really thumbs-up it here. It's not a deal-breaker for me; it's just something that elicits mild approval rather than a fist-pump.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. (1) Oh man on Willie Nelson! I can't unsee that now, wow.

      (2) That's interesting. Perhaps that's true - it would certainly explain it. Maybe Flagg's been puppeteering him so long too it leaves a Flagg-imprint on his personality.

      Delete