"Was it God that made magic,
or was it magic that made God?"
A reasonable question. |
Let's see if I can unpack that a little.
MIA AND THE PRIM
AND KEEP IT MOVING
Here's how I wrote it up immediately after finishing this re-read:
"The basic gist is that roundabout 10,000 A.C.E. the technology/ magic of the world went kablooey and the Prim/ monsters now had access to the world. All of the Pennywises, the Wolfmen, the Draculas, the bug-like monsters of the Mist, you name it. Among these monsters are the can-toi, whom the Crimson King has promised to remake the world in their image. Walter is pretending to work with the Crimson King, who either knows and is biding his time or is too focused on his own insane ambitions to notice. Walter's doing this because he likes secrets. Maerlyn's globes all pass through his hands, but hey. Walter and the CK are working together, though, on this weird magical pregnancy with a midwife they created from Prim mists and bad vibes. They graft this onto Susannah (somehow) because all prophecies have the protagonist slain by his red-headed progeny. Like literally that is their reason: it sounds good in these old books. Of course, all of the above only has to make the loose sort of sense a skimming-of-King's-unconscious might; we're waterskiing on the random echo-waves of everything he's ever taken to the brain. (Like that J-Lo movie The Cell. Mash-up with King's Cell? Too far.)"
As aforementioned, it's asking a lot of an audience to sit still for more of this stuff - even if prior to the meta-walls crumbling down, more-of-this-stuff was what I eagerly wanted to read - after the author's already yanked the curtain down. Not everyone agrees this is as much of a problem as I do. But personally, the balloon just kind of deflates a little further each time he gets into this stuff - if I was there I'd do the move-it-along-dude Roland finger-roll thing *- or throws beamquakes or other dangers at the characters. There's no real danger or suspense anymore, just a patient curiosity to see how it will all end up. And since I know that already, the re-read for these sections is a lot like the alien / smoking-man storyline in The X-Files. Who gives a crap? Plot developments (or plot derailments) of the series itself already made this stuff moot, and it's the sort of thing that only works if it remains very-much-not-moot.
* Does Roland do this anytime in The Gunslinger or did he develop this affectation after he lost several fingers on his other hand? Or does he do this gesture with his afflicted hand? Even better. "Let my absent fingers remind you of time you'll never get back."
Again, not everyone agrees. (About that aspect of the X-Files, neither.) It's worse here though because King carries on with the conceit that these are characters moving towards a goal in a universe with rules. All the whole extra worldbuilding, all the mystical pregnancy stuff retconning the speaking demon sex scenes, and the various timelines-hopping and interdimensional mental projection: I'm just waiting it all out. It doesn't matter if it makes sense; you move beyond judgment, beyond good and evil, once you turn down the "why don't I put myself into this story?" path. Throw one Harry Potter sneech and look what happens.
ALL THAT SAID...
I actually enjoyed reading this much more than I did the first time. I wasn't disappointed by the mystery unfolding in directions I didn't like, since I knew what was going to happen, so I could just enjoy some of the moments. And there's plenty of fun scenes and sequences, especially once John Cullom - one of King's everymen - and Jack Andolini and his pals show up.
The illustrations by Darrell Anderson are kind of cool. My least favorite book in the series (perhaps) gets my favorite illustrations. Weird.
ROSALITA, ROSALITA...
that stout-of-heart, wide-of-hip, Oriza-throwin', Beams-knowin' woman of the borderlands.
I got nothing here, the description just amuses me. Roland's range of romantic action is kind of odd in the Dark Tower books. From a few different whores to the love of his life in Mejis to Rosalita to the strange affair with Irene Tassenbaum in bk7. And the one semen-swapping demon of course.
...eww |
FUN LINE
"It hurt like the veriest motherfucker of creation."
MORE OF THIS STUFF
"Once upon a time all was Discordia, and from it, strong and crossing at a single unifying point, came the 6 beams (...) There was magic to hold them steady for eternity, but when magic left from all there is but the Dark Tower, which some have called Can Calyx, the Hall of Resumption, men despaired. When the Age of Magic passed, the Age of Machines began. They created the machines which ran the beams, and now the machines are failing. The Crimson King's breakers are only hurrying a process that's already in train."
I hate to even get wrapped up in this after deciding none of it matters anyway, but how long exactly have the Breakers been at this? Several generations of Calla folken at least. What exactly are they doing? Magic built the beams and the Tower - or they themselves are manifestations of magic - and then men built machines to bolster them, and now Breakers are using squiggley-doodles and tele-Sudoku to un-beamify the multiverse?
All of these epic sagas square protagonists up against the undoing of everything from some ultimate force/ evil; I don't need it to be literally spelled out in every detail. But I need to understand more than I do here. I need something more tangible than "To Break is divine". I guess these are more Book 7 thoughts. Mark your calendars!
Speaking of:
THE MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN
It doesn't get more tangible than the author having a few beers with (in front of, I guess, while they look with a measure of awe and embarrassment) his creations.
This is another section I liked more than expected. King comes across well, and I'd be curious to hear from those who know him (or knew him in the 70s) if he got himself right. Storytelling-wise, the todana-death-bag and other foreshadowing works pretty well. It doesn't get the pay-off it deserves in bk 7.
King's diaries that end the book are an interesting narrative device for the penultimate book of the series, but the voice is off. He doesn't sound like the guy we met earlier in the book, or the King we know from countless intros and endnotes. Okay, let's say he has different voices for different tasks. Problem is, this King sounds like the diary writer from countless other King works (The Plant, "Survivor Type," The Regulators, etc.) Could he actually be commenting on his tendency towards sameness of diary-voice? It seems impossible. Could he be that much a master of meta-puppetry?
A FEW LAST THINGS
- I haven't even commented on the title character too much. I didn't care for the Maid of Constant Sorrow refrains, or the jailhouse/ answering machine of the damned motif, although I guess that was an effective way of straddling various timelines. (I liked it better in "1408," though.)
- King's hostility towards Calvin Tower continues to crack me up, both in-story and meta-wise. I guess this is pretty much the high point of it all. All the characters abuse him to a degree I never quite understand. But it feels very meta. There's something going on here, some reaction to his fame or marketability or both. I bet there was a scene where Roland pistol-whips him that Tabby made him take out.
- The sköldpadda (the item in the lining of the bag teased throughout the last act of Wolves of the Calla) is awfully convenient. More magic items from the man behind the curtain - is King commenting on himself here, too? Ka. Anyway, like all such magic items, they'd have come in useful elsewhere or are not utilize beyond getting the characters out of certain scenes.
- I covered the fake language stuff and how much it bugged me by this point in the series, so I won't spend time on it, do'ee kennit? Kra? Twim.
- I didn't read a single one of the "commala" stanzas that end every chapter. I hope there's gold in there - the secret to the universe, even. I'm happy to die missing out on it from skipping these. Two can play the stubborn game, Mr. King.
FINAL VERDICT
All in all, a better read than I remembered, but my original opinion (what the hell did you do to your series, dude?) remains unchanged.
~
Stephen King as an author fascinates me, because he can make damn near god awful, and very much so nonsensical shit read so well you don't care. Like once you accept a book like Song of Susannah or Christine isn't very good and just read it for fun, you do manage to find fun. I don't know if that's talent or a waste of talent but I'm a fan either way.
ReplyDeleteThat's been my experience as well. Once I get over the initial disappointment (or even frustration as was the case with my initial read of the Dark Tower, that sense of heavy investment going in some new direction I didn't like at all) the expectation goes away and I can just enjoy his kinetic gifts for the written word.
Delete(1) A story built on a constant breaking of the fourth wall can work. I think it's just a question of finding the right approach. It seems like that was something King couldn't quite manage with this one.
ReplyDeleteThat's part of my ultimate thoughts about this series, though not all of it. That still remains in reserve. Calendar marked.........Uhhhh, how should I mark this one again?
(2) I sort of learned early on that the real strength of "The X Files" was that it was always at it's best (even in more run of the mill episodes) was when it just stuck to a "Monster-of-the-Week" approach. It's pretty much best to just view it as an anthology series with some recurring host characters to provide a connective tissue.
Hell, based on what I've heard about the latest season, the makers themselves seem to have learned this is the best route to go.
I suppose you could argue a similar approach is also King's biggest strength as well.
(3) It's sort of funny, while I can't credit King for world-building, at least as far as Mid-World is concerned, when I read all those backstory words for the first time in a long while, it just suddenly hit me.
While those words may not be impressive as world-building, they do serve to highlight a major thematic concern of their author's. Those words seem to mark King out as sharing thematic concerns with Romantic writers and poets like Keats, Wordsworth, or Shelly.
The key here is that all those old guys were around for the beginning of the industrial revolution. The long and short of it is that they didn't like what they saw. In particular, they saw a lot of people losing a mental horizon that was a lot more expanded before the advent of machines changed people's working habits so that there was no room left for a bit of imagination to make anyone care about the nature of their own labors.
A lot of the poetry of the Romantics was an attempt to counter-act this un-imaginative tendency on the part of the burgeoning modern age. I have to admit it's somewhat gratifying to see that this concern has survived them all if a writer like King can make a thematic expression of these same concerns, even the expression itself is a bit clumsy.
(4) For the record, I think part of the reason I was able to understand all that was because just lately I've had to put some thoughts in order about another scribbling fella who seems to have shared a lot of the same concerns just listed by King.
https://www.scriblerusinkspot.com/2019/06/tolkien-2019.html
His thematic expression further than King's Mid-World centric stuff, however the attempt to capture his life story, not so much.
ChrisC
(1) Oh yeah, it can work. Maybe even an epic genre saga like this - but I agree: I don't think he managed to blend how it all began with the new development as well as he had to to make it work.
Delete(2) Agreed there, too. In theory if someone did a HAVEN-style Dark Tower show and just focused on all new Dark-Tower/robot-of-the-week episodes with one or two mythology episodes per season, I could hang with that.
(3) I definitely think the Romantic with a capital R side of King is being explored and unpacked in these books, for sure. As mixed in with the more American New Wave firings of his synapses perhaps.
(3) Well, seems like you just helped me figure something on a semi-related topic I already explored with Alan Moore.
DeleteI think the concept of King being part of a New Wave in literature is pretty damned interesting. I'll have to get back to that, sooner or later.
ChrisC.
(A) "Does Roland do this anytime in The Gunslinger or did he develop this affectation after he lost several fingers on his other hand?" -- I could be wrong about this, but I believe this affectation began in Book V. So it's another of those weird things that only became a thing in the series post-accident. I think.
ReplyDelete(B) "And since I know that already, the re-read for these sections is a lot like the alien / smoking-man storyline in The X-Files. Who gives a crap?" -- Excellent comparison.
(C) "Again, not everyone agrees. (About that aspect of the X-Files, neither.)" -- As regards King, that's kind of me. I don't have strong feelings about it either way. Like, my brain recognizes it as a deficiency, but my enthusiasm continues more or less undamaged. I'm very curious to see whether this maintains in my next reread, though; these latter books, I've only read them twice. Or shit, is it just once...? Might just be once. Either way, it's been a decade and a half, so I'm not super current in my opinions.
As regards "The X-Files," I think I actually enjoyed that stuff MORE once I knew beyond a shadow of a doubt that it didn't make any sense. Freed of that expectation, I could just enjoy that aspect of the show as a series of moments. At least until the relaunch. For the relaunch, nothing.
(D) "I wasn't disappointed by the mystery unfolding in directions I didn't like, since I knew what was going to happen, so I could just enjoy some of the moments." -- Oh, funny. This is what I get for making this comments as a sort of live-tweet thing, rather than after the fact! But, I mean, you're right. Expectations can be a curse, and once that curse is lifted, it can and does sometimes help (if only a bit).
(E) "This is another section I liked more than expected. King comes across well, and I'd be curious to hear from those who know him (or knew him in the 70s) if he got himself right." -- I'd be especially fascinated to know what Tabitha thought about this entire plot development.
This whole aspect of the series remains contentious as fuck, and rightly so. My knee-jerk reaction upon reading it was to gape at it in despair. But then, by golly, it's just so well-written that you kind of marvel at the guy for it. Whatever one's opinion of it as a plot device, I think one has to admit that King gave it his all; it might be the worst idea anyone ever had, but he committed to it. So there's at least that.
But yeah, for my part, I have grown to actually love it. And I do not fault anyone who cannot go there with me, not one iota.
(F) "Could he be that much a master of meta-puppetry?" -- I tend to think not, at least consciously. But I can't rule it out, either.
(G) "I didn't read a single one of the "commala" stanzas that end every chapter. I hope there's gold in there - the secret to the universe, even." -- From what I recall, there isn't.
You switched to letters and not (numerals)? A new approach!
Delete(C) What are your thoughts on the relaunch? I only saw the one Darin Morgan episode, which you pointed me to if memory serves, and which I enjoyed very much.
I agree, though: the X-files mythology episodes can be enjoyed for what they are (particularly some of those earlier suspenseful ones where they kept teasing out the black-ink stuff in the eyes, and where Krychek was getting tortured all the time) once you stop worrying about how it's all not adding up.
(E) I just wish he'd tried a bit harder with getting the voice right in the diary entries. It's such a noticeable change from all other King-voices. This is a problem in book 7, too, when the narrative voice changes into some kind of Sentimental Carnival Ringmaster.
(F) I don't really think he's doing that, but it is fun to consider himself just fully aware of all his tics and tendencies and masterfully impersonating himself.
I figured Chris had already started a thread of thoughts using numbers, and it made sense to me to do something to make it plain that I was starting a different one. It makes sense in my brain, if noplace else!
Delete(C) I'm of mixed opinion on the relaunch. I didn't see most of the 11th season; I bought the Blu-ray, but haven't gotten around to it yet. What I did see struck me as similar to the 10th season -- not quite up to vintage X-Files standards, but solid. One big caveat: this was not true of any of the mythology episodes I saw. All of those -- the Chris Carter episodes -- were embarrassingly bad. I mean, like, take-this-show-away-from-Chris-Carter-NOW bad. I mean, like, wondering-if-Chris-Carter-has-had-a-stroke-and-is-no-longer-fully-competent-mentally bad. The 11th season premiere, in particular, may be the single worst episode of the series.
A shame.
(E) I don't remember much about the diary entries except that they gave me the shivers at the time the book came out.
I do, however, remember that shift in voice in the seventh book. It didn't bother me as much as it bothers you, but it wasn't a favorite aspect, either. It kind of reminds me of a similar thing in "The Eyes of the Dragon," where it galls me more because I find the book wrapped around it to be less enjoyable.
(F) Thing with a guy like King is, you can't write the possibility off fully. That's how good he's capable of being. In this way, he's not at all unlike Stanley Kubrick, whose command of cinematic language was so strong that when he fucked up and made a continuity error, it created decades worth of thought as to what secret meaning he was trying to impart by doing it.
And you can't really rule THAT out, either, can you?
I love it, in both cases.