7.17.2015

From Novel to Film pt. 21: Jewel of the Seven Stars / Blood from the Mummy's Tomb


Jewel of the Seven Stars (1903) is an Egyptology-flavored gothic horror novel from Bram Stoker, the author of Dracula. Blood from the Mummy's Tomb is the Hammer Horror adaptation of the novel from 1971. It was adapted in other places, as well, perhaps most notably as The Awakening with Charlton Heston in 1980, which I somehow never saw despite my parents having it on VHS for all of the VCR era. (Hell, maybe they still do - I'll check next time I visit.)

As an adaptation, Blood is quite a bit different than its source material. A popular misconception is that The Mummy (with Boris Karloff) is based on Jewel, but it is not. For all that Blood has in common with Jewel, however, both it and The Mummy might as well be based on Stoker's book.

Broad-strokes-wise, all the three works really have in common is the same sort of Ancient Egypt/ violated tombs story arc.


I read the story in paperback, with only the revised 1912 ending, like some damn rube. You can download it to your mobile device here and read either the 1912 version or the original. Or even have it read to you. Next we'll be able to remotely resurrect mummies ourselves as an app, sidestep all the ritualistic hoopla.


The novel opens with Malcolm Ross, a London barrister, being called to the home of the lady he admires, one Margaret Trelawney, on account of her father falling into a mysterious coma. Actually, "admires" is putting it mildly. He's infatuated with her. In his sublimated and eccentric late Victorian way:

"She had marvelous eyes; great, wide-open, and as black and soft as velvet, with a mysterious depth. To look in them was like gazing at a black mirror such as Doctor Dee used in his wizard rites. I heard an old gentleman at the picnic, a great oriental traveler, describe the effect of her eyes 'as looking at night at the great distant lamps of a mosque through the open door.'"

Played in the film by Valerie Leon, whose eyes may fall short of this hyperbole. Whose wouldn't?
She's certainly a memorable Margaret/ Queen Tera, regardless.

The film eventually has the elder Trelawney fall into his coma, but not until 30 minutes into the story. It's not the center of the drama as it is in the book, just one of many plot twists. And his name is changed to Fuchs, for some reason, (played by Andrew Keir) and Malcolm becomes "Tod Browning" (played by Mark Edwards). Also, Tod and Margaret start the film as lovers, so the whole burgeoning-love-in-our-protagonists'-hearts plot from the book is excised.

Also: the story takes place in the 1960s, not the early 1900s.

These changes didn't bother me. Most of the changes didn't bothered me. I like updating it to the 60s (go-go boots! Hippie beards!) and I'm fine with skipping the courtship altogether, particularly the Victorian courtship of the book. I was disappointed to see some of the characters I enjoyed from the novel (such as Dr. Winchester and Detective Dolan, who stood watch over the comatose elder Trelawny with Malcolm and Margaret, and fought a few more ghost-mummy attacks) dropped from the story, particularly Detective Dolan, who, upon Trelawney's awakening, leaves the novel, eager to get back to "wholesome, criminal work." But again, so much of the novel is re-arranged and discarded that their absence is hardly felt.

Anyway, that's how the novel begins, with Mr. Trelawney under a mystical coma-curse, repeatedly attacked by what appears to be a cat, and everyone else watching and worrying. The film begins things with a woman being entombed in Ancient Egypt. Before the priests seal the sarcophagus, they hack off her hand and throw it to the jackals.

Whereupon it crawls back into the tomb.

As soon as the priest seal the tomb, they are all brutally killed by a sudden and furious sandstorm. The astral "ka" of Queen Tera - the woman just entombed - has exacted her first revenge. All of this is in the book, too, but it is only recounted in the novel upon the appearance of one Mr. Corbeck:


Played by James Villiers (one of the actors to play Tanner in the James Bond movies.)

Corbeck is the film's main villain - though you could argue Queen Tera, sure - but he is not villainous in the novel at all. He is Trelawney's longtime assistant, only recently returned from Egypt with the lamps from Queen Tera's tomb in the Valley of the Sorcerer. These are necessary for the ritual Trelawney is planning to resurrect the long-dead queen.

Here's his approaching-mad-scientist-but-isn't-he-right,-though? rousing Braveheart speech from the novel:

"Life and resurrection are themselves but items in what may be won by the accomplishment of this Great Experiment. Imagine what it will be for the world of thought - the true world of human progress - the veritable road to the Stars, the itur ad astra of the Ancients - if there can come back to use out of the unknown past one who can yield to us the lore stored in the Great Library of Alexandria, and lost in its consuming flames. Not only history can be set right, and the teachings of science made veritable from their beginnings; but we can be placed on the road to the knowledge of lost arts, lost learning, lost sciences, so that our feet may tread on the indicated path to their ultimate and complete restoration."

The film keeps the lamps' significance, but has them already in Fuchs' possession.
I like how their placement corresponds to the seven stars of the novel's title. (The Plough, aka The Big Dipper)

Several characters are invented to accompany Corbeck's and Trelawney on their initial expedition to the Queen's tomb in the film. (My favorite of them is Aubrey Morris.) They remove everything within at once and spirit it back to England - no need for Corbeck's return visit to get the lamps. This sets up the pattern of the film, i.e. the Queen, via her modern-day agents, Corbeck and Margaret, visit each of these companions in turn, killing them and returning the items to Fuchs' house.


The settings are more or less the same from novel to film, except the end of the book takes place in the Trelawney's seaside villa, tucked away from everything else. In a cavern beneath it, as a matter of fact, with pulleys that the old man brags about installing for just such a purpose, and electric light and all the wonders of 1903. 

In the film, the ritual takes place in Trelawney's ultimate man-cave in the basement.

Before we get to the end, though, Margaret is more overtly hypnotized and controlled by the ancient Queen in the film than she is in the novel, where Margaret becomes mysteriously more and more forthright and assured. Many reviewers pinpoint this as Stoker's commentary on the "New Woman," i.e. the suffragette, no longer awaiting permission to actualize. Makes sense to me. It's ironic, and likely intentional, that it is the manifestation of a decidedly Ancient Woman that heralds this new era of Woman. At least in Stoker's imagination. (As it would for Wonder Woman's creator several decades later.)


In the book, it is Margaret's cat, possessed by Queen Tera's mummified cat familiar, who is activated by her astral commands.
In the film, her familiar is changed from cat to snake.
As she becomes more and more under the spell of Tera, Tod tries to keep up. But can't.
Adios, Tod.
Then she goes on a killing spree.

THE END

In the original ending to the novel, Queen Tera speaks to those assembled for the Great Experiment through Margaret, and her father asks if she is willing to sacrifice her familiar (the cat) to achieve her goals. Though distressed, she agrees. They destroy the cat and then perform the ritual. The storm that is raging outside shatters the windows, and chaos ensues. When the smoke clears, literally, Malcolm discovers everyone is dead, and the mummy of Queen Tera has vanished.

It's an ambiguous and downbeat ending, to be sure. Perhaps that's why Stoker's publishers urged him to come up with something different for the 1912 edition. There, the elder Trelawney still negotiates the destruction of her familiar, but only the mummy disappears. Everyone is knocked unconscious, but no one is killed. There is a coda where Malcolm and Margaret marry, and it is left ambiguous whether the Queen transferred herself into Margaret, or perhaps their offspring.

Is it odd that they're so insistent on the mummy-cat's destruction? On one hand, it's been attacking them throughout the book. On the other, they're basically telling their new Queen that they're going to destroy her tomb-and-astral-companion of millennia. Beyond that, though, it seems a little odd for the sequence of events. If I have a criticism overall of the book, it's that once Trelawney awakens, he dominates the narrative with lectures and too many arbitrary decisions. 

In the film, once Trelawney awakes, he is filled with doubts about the whole thing, and he and Margaret (after eliminating everyone else in the movie) have a last-minute change of heart.

They attack Corbeck and the awakening Queen.

It ends with nurses discussing their patient, this bandaged-up lady. 

Is it Margaret or the Queen?

FINAL VERDICT: For the novel, the Dark Dimension's review sums it up pretty well:

"The trappings of a classic Victorian-era tale are present (...) the house is full of Egyptian tomb furnishings, including sarcophagi and mummies. Trelawney has left detailed and ludicrously uninformative instructions behind. Servants quit as strange events unfold. Margaret and Malcolm experience instant and oh-so-chaste love at first sight, with soulful looks and sincere pledges of devotion aplenty. Doctors drop everything to make days-long house calls. Detectives arrive and bumble around. Pseudoscientific theories and spiritualist ideas are earnestly proposed, intermingled, and expounded upon. There is the old seaside mansion pummeled by a howling storm. There is even the classic "lights out" bit at a climactic moment. There is a definitely spooky atmosphere to it all." 

I think that's a fine list of Victorian gothic horror (or detective) tropes. And if you are fine with embracing all or any of the above provided the payoff is worth it, I say Jewel will appeal to you. Be forewarned that the ending does not tie everything up into a neat package, though. (Either ending, but certainly the original.) 

The film is probably exactly what you imagine when you hear the words "Hammer Horror."


A successful if not exemplary example of such.

As if living up to the popular myth of the Mummy's Curse, Blood was a troubled production - Peter Cushing, cast as Trelawney, was forced to withdraw when his wife was diagnosed with emphysema, and five weeks into the six week shot, the director, Seth Holt, died of a heart attack, on set. 


~
was
(finished by Michael Carreras) with a

7.15.2015

Spider-Man: 1986 pt. 2

SPIDER-MAN in the 1980s , 
pt. 9 of 12.




Too much Spidey-awesomeness for one post - here is the rest of the story, 1986.


1. THE BEST OF SPIDER-MAN

 


This little beauty collects 6 or 7 story arcs from the newspaper strip (all written by Stan Lee; most drawn by John Romita, Sr.). Like this one with The Prowler:




That's not my favorite, just the only one I have handy. My favorite was probably the one where Spidey seeks his fortune on That's Incredible! but I have no screencaps for it, alas.

Anything written by Stan and drawn by JSSR is worth checking out; you know this . But the best part of it for me at the time was Stan's introduction. It's likely just a collection of the same anecdotes and well-worn jokes he'd been telling for years, but I hadn't seen any of it before. Great stuff. One trait Stan Lee and FDR shared - they could address an audience of millions and still make you feel like they're speaking directly and solely to you.





2.
Written by George S. Elrick. Artist unknown


This came out in 1976 - why is it being covered here? Because here's when I got it. I'll skip plot summary and go right to this terrifically entertaining word-salad right here

"Spider-Man made sticky in the shark's mouth. He is love way with animals, probably because he's part spider. The shark has angry eyes:

"I think Spider-Man did the rape."


That's from Something Awful, which has (or had? Not sure if it's ongoing) this series called "Reading Time" which is basically reviews from the point of view of a confused child or bad translation. Here's some more: 

"This book tells us that you have to be careful about how you use your powers when you're a superhero, because the Giant Flying Scales are watching. I think the True Lesson they want us to learn is that when it's time for us to go Outside, we can't spend all our time doing love ways with sharks and goats and elderly. The end."

I had no time for this, really, as a 12 year-old, but as an adult, its weirdness and unintentional hilarity greatly appeal to me. For starters, Peter romantically pursues Jane Virgo, who he thinks is some hippie chick but is in reality an ancient caveman, who has the power to transform into the various animals and signs of the zodiac. Pagan pansexual transmorph excitement! It's almost like slashfic, except it's done in that Whitman Big Little Book format. Here's some closing remarks from a more straightforward review:

"This relentless volley between text and picture makes almost every Big Little Book a fertile source for popular surrealism--but I believe Spider-Man Zaps Mr. Zodiac is particularly dazzling in its weird illogic and thus ripe for musical adaptation. If only Bono and the Edge had the courage to be slightly less ambitious, SMZMZ would be the perfect skeleton on which to drape a few slightly reworked entries from the U2 back catalog." (referring to the Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark debacle.)


3. PETER PARKER SOAP OPERA

The whole Flash/Ned/Betty love triangle really hits high gear this time around. But first let's introduce the two new ladies in Peter Parker's orbit:


3a.
Kate Cushing and Joy Mercado from NOW Magazine.


Kate is the magazine's editor - or Peter's boss at any rate; I can't keep track. Robbie's in charge of the Bugle, JJJ's hanging around somewhere, and then there are these two NOW Magazine chicks - and Joy is the writer he's often paired with. We don't get too, too much from Kate:


Here is Mark Beachum's take on the character. He drew everyone with these leggings - and fair enough, they were popular back in the day - but your guess is as good as mine re: the football jersey and shoulder pads.


but Joy is involved in many issues. 

Such as this ill-advised IRA plot that takes Peter and Joy to London, Dublin, and Belfast.
Or this "Where Is Spider-Man?" multi-parter discussed last time. (Notice: different work trip/ same outfit.)
She and Peter have a will-they-or-won't-they thing going on, to some degree, but nothing ever happens.
Or maybe something did happen, who knows? I don't ask questions. I just peek into their apartments and eavesdrop on their thought balloons.


I have no memory of either of these ladies from reading this the first time around. I remember Peter working for NOW Magazine and going out-of-town on sporadic photo assignments, but that's about it. 


3b. BIZARRE LOVE TRIANGLE(s)
(Not the New Order kind.)


Lots of subplots converge this year. Let's recap:


Flash and Sha-Shan continue to flirt with divorce.
Flash continues to get the wrong idea of Sha-Shan's reaching out to Peter.
Uh-oh. Flash must not watch any Lifetime. This is how you get yourself Gone-Girl'd.


Meanwhile, Flash is still seeing Betty, who is increasingly estranged from Ned Leeds.


Ned drags Lance Bannon along to spy on them.
Ned confronts Flash.


"You'll eat my fist, jerk!" is dialogue I can get behind. Now, for reasons that will hopefully be clear momentarily, let us interrupt this recap with a recap of the who-is-the-Hobgoblin saga. Is it:


a) Lance Bannon?
b) Ned Leeds?
c) Roderick Kingsley? (The once and future Hobgoblin)
d) Or this mysterious figure whom Roderick is meeting?


Let's pretend for a minute that we don't know who and just look at what happens after all the above.

The Hobgoblin needs a hostage and singles out Sha-Shan.


Spider-Man (who is in one of his every-few-years "That's it! I will Spider-Man no more forever!" phases) gives chase, whereupon (after the Hobgoblin unknowingly throws the fight) he makes a shocking discovery:


See? GONE-GIRLED.


Of course, it's just a frame-job by the real Hobgoblin, whomever he is. 

I'm still curious how DeFalco planned to explain having the Rose (who was his pick for the Hobgoblin's secret identity) and the Hobgoblin in the same place at the same time.


I can't tell you how wrapped up in this crap I was 29 years ago. And over the last couple of weeks.

But wait there's more!


4. AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 272 - 283
Written by Tom DeFalco, Peter David with Jo Duff.
Penciled by Sal Buscema, Ron Frenz, Charles Vess, Mike Harris, and Rick Leonardi.



4a. END OF AN ERA


1986 was the last year of the DeFalco/ Frenz team.

Here's Jim Owsley on how the era ultimately ended: "I had been told (by Shooter) at least a dozen times to fire Tom. Tom was late. Tom was busy. Tom was distracted. And now, Tom was not doing his best on Spider-Man. Inker Joe Rubinstein quit, annoyed that DeFalco and Frenz were habitually erratic. I scheduled fill in after fill in, affecting sales."

DeFalco's take: (from Back Issue 35) "Owsley gave us a schedule that basically said I'd have to do a plot every three weeks to get the book on time. So Ron and I would follow that schedule and when I would turn in the third plot, Owsley would give us a new schedule that showed I was a month late. And he kept doing this to us. (...) Editors get to create their own schedules. I think what Shooter said to Owsley was 'If the guy can't make deadlines, get rid of him.' So consequently, Owsley was constantly revising and remaking the deadlines."  

Back to Owsley: "I told Jim I was taking Tom off of ASM, and creating this other animal (Sensational Spider-Man, a quarterly special - Tom and Ron could do as much Spider-Man as they wanted and were capable of doing, and we'd be off the hook for the monthly deadline) for him and Ron. Jim said, fine." 


Owsley in the 80s. (Photo from Eliot R. Brown's website. Hope he doesn't mind.)


"Tom took the news very hard. It ended our friendship, and, I am told, Tom saw Jim's hand in this and threatened to quit. A stunned Shooter appeared at my door the next day, and I knew I was about to be fired. He asked me, and I quote 'Why'd you do that?' I just stared at him as he stammered and stared at the floor (...) and I felt like I was the victim of some macabre Corleone plot. What the blessed hell was this man talking about?! I cleared this all with him before I did it. (...) I said, 'Because you told me to.' To which Jim replied, and I'll never forget this, 'Yeah, but I never thought you'd actually do it.'


(Photo from Spidermancrawlspace - hope they don't mind.)


So there we have it. I'm sure the truth is somewhere in-between everyone's takes, of course. At the time, as per usual, I was completely unaware of any of this behind-the-scenes stuff. I never read the comics journals or anything like that until much later, and things like Marvel Age I just skimmed. In fact, it took me a few months to even realize first DeFalco and Frenz, then Owsley, then Shooter, were all off the book. 

But, next time.


4b. OKAY, THE JOKE ISN'T FUNNY ANYMORE
(Not a Smiths reference)




4c. THE BEYONDER

Secret Wars II came out in '86. It sold well, but as a huge fan of the first one, it was disappointing. If you're unfamiliar, the sequel was about the Beyonder coming to Earth and learning how to do things like eat and pee. Then he banged the Dazzler, became a guru, then a cranky would-be-universe-destroyer. That's a highly-parsed summary of events, you understand. Its main gimmick was crossing over into almost every Marvel title. 

The Puma stories are fine, but I had so much other stuff I'm fine just namechecking them. 274, though, is worth mentioning. It didn't quite hit me the way it did when I was 12, but if you know anybody around that age who is interested in an entry-level Spider-epic (and has a flair for the dramatic) I recommend it. 

The Beyonder shows up in Mephisto's realm to let him know that enough's enough, he's destroying the multiverse. "Desire makes every being in existence unfulfilled, incomplete. It just doesn't work." He's a little like an anti-Buddha. Same diagnosis, exact opposite conclusion.


Mephisto talks him into a wager to stall the end of all things. The Beyonder agrees, though he chooses the champions. For his cause, he picks Zarathos (aka the demon who possessed Johnny Blaze to become the original Ghost Rider); for Mephisto's, he picks Spider-Man.


What follows is a torturous day for Peter Parker, as he relives every terror of his life.
Plus boils.



4d. SINISTER SYNDICATE

I've mentioned my enduring love for Spider-Man Annual 1, where Spidey is attacked by the Sinister Six, the group formed by Doctor Octopus on the principle that teaming up to combat Spider-Man will sextuple their chances to defeat him. (Whereupon they immediately split up and attack him individually.) The Beetle sees the illogic in this approach and gathers a new group of Spidey-villains together to attack Spider-Man (and Silver Sable and the reformed Sandman) over two action-packed issues.


They more or less level Coney Island in the process.


Like the Firelord two-parter from '85, I've read better stories, but for an undiluted blast of web-slinger vs. super-bad-guys mayhem, can't go wrong with stuff like this. Would make a great 2-parter for sweeps week.


4e. LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, ONCE AGAIN:
THE HOBGOBLIN

Look, I've said just about everything I can say about these Hobgoblin years without overreaching.




It was a great era of Spidey, and the Hobgoblin was the perfect arch-villain for it. 1986 is the decade's last unabashedly awesome year in the Hobgoblin saga. Everything goes tits-up in '87. The character continues, of course, right on down to the present, but his momentum was permanently blunted in '87.

So let me just throw some fun images at you and call it a day. How can you disapprove with stuff like these - 


Hobgoblin was always upgrading his weaponry. Here is his new "multi-blast".
Jack O'Lantern - to his immediate regret - inserts himself more directly in the Hobgoblin saga.


4f. ANNUAL

ASM's annual this year features the return of the Iron Man of 2020, whom last we saw getting trounced by X-51 in Machine Man (1984).




Written by Fred Schiller and Ken McDonald and illustrated by Mark Beachum -


so: butts (see last time for explanation, Section 3, clause c.) -


this story takes place five years before the events of Machine Man. And creates a new timeline of its own, I suppose - it's not exactly clear, and I'm not sure if this is one of the timelines represented in the new timelime-scrambler, Secret Wars (2015). If you know, let me know in the comments, would you?

Iron Man (aka Arno Stark, who disappointingly does not refer to himself in the third person "of 2015") tries to stop a madman from detonating a nuclear device (a "planet buster bomb".) Unfortunately, the madman is destroyed before his retinal scan can disarm the bomb, so Arno heads into the past, having discovered an old headline with the same person. He kidnaps the boy and is just about to scan his eye when Spider-Man intervenes. When the boy is injured due to Arno's recklessness, Spidey loses it.




Spider-Man's intervention (and beatdown - does this make sense? Isn't Iron Man's armor impervious to Spider-Man's fists? You'd figure it would be. I mean, we've seen him batter Firelord, I know, but still.) prevents Arno from getting the scan, so we get this real bummer of an ending (but powerful) when he's pulled back to 2015:




Did this make Spider-Man's next meeting with the Iron Man of his own time really awkward? It must have - I mean, Spidey has no idea this Iron Man is from the future. Wouldn't he be super-pissed about this? I don't think this was ever followed up on, but I could be wrong.

~
NEXT: The Shooter Era Endeth! DeFalco Gets the Big Chair! Kraven's Last Hunt!