As a child, my favorite reading was Marvel Comics. In close second: the Three Investigators series of books.
This won’t be a long post. Most of the story is explaining the story, and there are enough sites out there already doing that. Quick version: it was a series of boy adventure detective stories from fifty-ish years ago that had the interesting wrinkle of Alfred Hitchcock introducing the stories and playing himself in at least one chapter. Until he died and the estate re-shuffled its licensing and tie-in-media needs. At that point “Hector Sebastian,” a fictional mystery writer, stepped in. At that point, the Hitch profile in the corner changed to a keyhole, so you always had to look for which one (at the library) - I was a stickler for the originals.
When my family moved in 1986 the books became scarce. Not sure why. This was before the days of lending libraries, yadda yadda, any/all of the original run of books I had run a pretty penny on eBay these days, yadda yadda - same old song and dance. In my own experience, if you find a T3I fan, usually you find someone who spent time outside the US in their childhood sometime in the 70s or 80s. Usually I say - I know of at least one exception.
Anyway. On to:
THE NOVEL
The Three Investigators have several motifs – leaving question marks around them, Jupiter’s uncle’s junkyard (with its two Bavarian handymen who, like the English Rolls chauffer, complete the odd aristocratic fantasy: boy-genius-heir to a junk empire), a “ghost to ghost hook-up” which involved the primitive use of dozens of dial-phones working in unison – and even more in subsequent books.
Written by Robert Arthur with interior illustrations by Harry Kane, Terror Castle casts the mold for the series to come.
As a kid this held my imagination start to finish. This was the age of read a chapter before you go to sleep and try to sneak one more with a flashlight under the bed.
Subsequent re-reads of all the others – I think you get the sense from all these posts that I’m a bit of a collector, a bit of a re-vister – never connected me to the childhood magic I got from the others: except for this one. Well, a couple of others, but this is the big one. The Secret of Terror Castle IS the Three Investigators, at least the mk-1 version. I doubt any of my kids will want to read them or even know what to make of them if they did. There’s a you-had-to-be-there vibe to a lot of it. If any of them were ever going to land, it would be this one.
THE FILM
I’ll give the film (a South African-German co-production; the books always sold well in both markets) credit for making sincere attempts to reach fans of the mk-1 set-up. Rocky Beach looks pretty cool. They got rid of Hans and Konrad and Alfred Hitchcock, but Worthington's here, and Aunt Mathilda and Uncle Titus (who get a German accent to sort of compensate for the loss of Hans and Konrad, I guess.) A few other things here and there seem like genuine efforts to reach across the years, and it'd be bad manners not to appreciate them. The casting of the kids was pretty good if you accept that the strokes are both broad and – in the case of Jupiter – fairly loose/ outside the lines.
Plotwise, well, they keep the haunted house. And it looks pretty cool. |
But everything else is invented for the film. |
And how! A romance for Bob, a connecting plot to Jupiter's parents, you name it. |
Plus plenty of updated (but already dated) tech and tactics to replace their hopelessly analog aesthetic. |
"Get out of my house." |
And more. I can’t fault them for any of the attempts. The result is… unsuccessful? Harmless? Actually kind of fun? Sort of lame? Not sure. Probably some of all that. I watched both of the attempts with this cast, and I kind of liked The Skeleton Isle. And I kind of liked this one, too, even while not enjoying either, really. I mostly rolled my eyes. It’s complicated.
It could be as simple as part of me really thrills seeing a familiar Three Investigators on screen. Even with all the changes. Most of me, though, thinks it was a nice attempt and a pretty slick production, but ultimately unsuccessful, as an adaptation or as a franchise-starter.
There’s a bit towards the beginning that cracked me up. It works to establish both the edgier Jupiter Jones and the more paramilitary T3I, but as the beginning of the movie, it's a start-and-stopper. A planned surprise birthday party for Jupiter falls flat because Jupiter hates birthdays. (His parents, duh!) Oh okay, everyone kind of shuffles off. But wait, who's the clown? It's a plant? Attack pattern delta! Okay, he got away. That was weird, right? What was he after? A very conspicuous clue to the whole mystery? Like the clue/ mystery was here the whole time, it just took some clown to come try to get it? Worked for The Goonies, I guess.
Wait, is that Hans and Konrad? It's got be. I guess they are here. I don't see them at the IMDB, though. |
~
This will be the last From Novel to Film entry. I didn’t plan this, I swear, but I’ve somehow ended on my literal first favorite book. Tiens! I suppose it could have been Bunnicula. Or Superfudge. And there’s a movie, too… hmmm… for both. Should I… ? Nah, better stick with that plan.
Thanks for reading, folks. |
Not mine, alas. |
(1) So this is where it all ends up? Well, hate to see it all come to a close, etc. Though I got to admit, it's been fun while it lasted.
ReplyDelete(2) Ho-lee-crap, THIS ONE!
Okay, there's a bit of serendipity going on here. I must have been born too late for this series. My childhood reading consisted of John Bellairs, "Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark", Bruce Coville and Betty Wren-Wright. They were my initial intro to literature, until guys named Poe and Conan Doyle, respectively, took over.
My point is I think I was just in time to catch the tail-end of the type of reading you're talking about. I even wrote my own two cents down about it all a while back:
https://www.scriblerusinkspot.com/2021/01/the-luck-of-lynns-1952.html
Hopefully, I plan on talking about more where that came from. As for "Terror Castle", there's a sort of irony involved for me. It's not something I ever ran into as a kid, however, the good news is that's sort of what the Net is for.
Just recently I ran into an online audiobook of version of the exact text you've been talking about:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-CwPv3yfeY
I have just two real questions. The first is sorta technical, I guess. What I mean is does Jones have that same "peculiar" way of speaking in the novel, as he does in what is essentially a radio drama?
The second is whether or not this helps in capturing the whole kind of vibe you've been trying to get across about the book, and the type of fiction and time it represents?
(3) You're not going to believe this. However, my final verdict on "COT", based just on the audio recording above, goes as follows:
Yeah, I'd say I'm willing to give it a passing grade. For whatever reason, Arthur is just able enough to tap into the kind of charm that the best of these types of books can have, and that sort of makes it a winner for me.
(4) If things are coming to an end, here, at least. Then for whatever it's worth, let's just say it wasn't a total loss. I'm quite willing to admit it was reading stuff like this, and "Truth Inside the Lie" that sort of planted the idea of adding my professional two cents in.
Whatever that amounts to, then at least you can say something was accomplished...I think? Either way, thanks for sowing the seeds of an idea, I guess.
ChrisC.
(4) Almost forgot (and was worried about running out of space again), did you also find yourself trying mentally impose the actual voice of the real Hitchcock over either the words in the book, or the voice actor chosen for him in the audio drama link?
ReplyDeleteBecause I know I did.
ChrisC
It was easy to do so in my head while reading, a little less so while listening.
DeleteThis reminds me. I was struck by the person reading the audiobook for Miles Gone By (William F. Buckley Jr.'s literary autobiography, i.e. bio as culled from his writings, collected together in a timeline) doing an odd impersonation of WFBJR. Sounded a little like him, but something was off, what was it? Why bother with the impersonation, too, I wondered? Then I checked the credits and lo and behold, it was WFBJR. What? How could someone with such an imitable, well-known voice (as Hitch was too) disguised, by himself?
The perfect parallel would be if it was HItch himself in that radio version, but no luck there, it's just funny how that works.
(2) Ah geez - the funny thing is, I included a link to that radio production you linked to in my original post but must've edited it out. I didn't realize it til right now, whoops. So second question: kind of, yeah, does capture some of the gee-willikers-ness/nevertheless-still-fun quality of the original book and era. (First question: when reading Jupe as a kid, I always pictured someone who sounded a little like Prop Joe from "The Wire.")
ReplyDelete(3) That's cool you listened to the whole radio production. That makes two of us! But seriously, we're in a select club, there.
(4) Hey, I'm glad to hear it. Although there'll be more posts through the end of 2021, just this is the last From Novel to Film. I've been on a farewell tour of sorts, the last month or two, dusting off some old series/ approaches.
(1) I'm experiencing some weird mental energy here. On the one hand, there are some serious recognition bells ringing in relation to a few of those images. On the other hand, I don't *think* I ever read any of these books. I think I'd remember them in much the same way I remember (i.e., incredibly vaguely) the "Encyclopedia Brown" books if I did. But the bell is ringing pretty hard, so I think I must have at least picked a few of these up at some point in time, even if it was only to glance at them.
ReplyDeleteAlternatively, the cheese is sliding off the cracker as I type. I'd believe either scenario.
(2) "the interesting wrinkle of Alfred Hitchcock introducing the stories and playing himself in at least one chapter. Until he died and the estate re-shuffled its licensing and tie-in-media needs. At that point “Hector Sebastian,” a fictional mystery writer, stepped in. At that point, the Hitch profile in the corner changed to a keyhole, so you always had to look for which one (at the library) - I was a stickler for the originals." -- This is fascinating. I hope I can resist the urge to ever try acquiring a set of these, because I'd be unable to accept the non-Hitchcock versions... right up until I had them all, at which I'd feel a need to acquire all the non-Hitch editions as well. I know myself too well, and can occasionally intervene beforehand!
(3) Those Harry Kane illustrations are strong.
(4) The movies don't sound like much, but it's kind of impressive that they exist at all.
(5) "I didn’t plan this, I swear, but I’ve somehow ended on my literal first favorite book. Tiens! I suppose it could have been Bunnicula." -- Bunnicula! I can see it now. I remember that cover clear as day; the book itself, not so much.
(6) Au revoir, From Novel to Film! Much good reading was had in your time.
(1) "The cheese is sliding off the cracker as I type" sounds like the sort of thing you'd hear over the wireless in "Red Dawn."
Delete(2) Oh yeah! Maybe 15 years ago I dropped like $200 on picking up 15-20 of the original hardcovers, all of which were falling apart. I ended up selling them for about the same amount - I liked having them on the shelf but they were falling apart. I decided to just make it one of those if-i-ever-get-rich items. Or: just invent the time machine so I can go back and tell my younger self, hey! Don't get rid of these damn things, they're too pricey to re-acquire as an old man.
(5) I tried reading "Bunnicula" to Evelyn and Lauren and they got scared. Will try again later. (Evelyn's reading "The Secret of NIMH" now, though.)
And (6) I'm very happy to hear that!
Delete