I figured it was high time to give Chicago some Scenic Route love. Not only is it one of the most photogenic and varied urban landscapes in the country, captured in its many distinct eras as much as any of the cities covered in these pages, it's also the Dog Star Omnibus Base of Operations. So here's some hometown love, courtesy of:
(1992) |
I'd always intended to cover Candyman for the Scenic Route, but my first choice for tonight's entry was Cooley High, the 1975 coming-of-age film written by Eric Monte. But the print I have is too muddy for effective Scenic Routing.
Alas. |
You can get a good idea, though, of what that Cooley High blog might've looked like with a crisp transfer here. Which brings up something I wanted to mention: the whole Scenic Route schtick (celebrating the fashions, landscapes, cars, and vibes of a bygone age via the cinematic record) is explored much more comprehensively in a surprising number of blogs out there. The one immediately aforelinked is one of them; here's another. I occasionally think I should spruce this series up - get out there and take pictures of my own if the film was shot in Chicago, research the history of architecture and development in any other city, read the critical literature about gentrification, track down the location scouting notes of any of these things, quote Tom Wolfe's From Bauhaus to Our House more, throw around Baron Haussman's or Daniel Burnham's name, etc. Then I google it and see these other blogs and breathe a sigh of relief - they're all so good that it'd be redundant of me to even try. Sweet! I can focus on what I really want to do, which is to just screencap at will and not worry too much about the other stuff.
"The Candyman, a murderous soul with a hook for a hand, is accidentally summoned to reality by a skeptic grad student researching the monster's myth."
Shot on location at Cabrini-Green, mostly demolished now. Candyman is one of the last films to capture it. |
What are these machines? |
Giant paper-clip decor never really caught on, in the 90s or anytime, really. (High-waisted jeans were ubiquitous, of course, but thankfully no more.) |
I somehow never saw Candyman until 2010 (ditto for Cooley High, actually, and I have my wife to thank for showing me both). Rogert Ebert has a thoughtful review of it here. It's not bad - it makes little sense, but a) neither does Freddy Krueger or Chucky, and b) like the Nightmare on Elm Street or Child's Play movies, they're (mostly) entertaining.
Speaking of not making sense:
THIS MAKES NO SENSE
At movie's end (spoiler I guess), the entire Cabrini Green community turns out for Virginia Madsen's character's funeral. Least they could do after she died saving one of their children, right? But then, the two that benefited most personally from her self-sacrifice / know the real reasons for the supernatural terror, for some reason toss the killer's hook into the grave.
Thus ensuring her ghost will wander angry between the worlds, ready to be used as a spirit of vengeance against any who say her name into a mirror. |
I mean, from a sequel/ horror-movie-twist-ending POV, it makes a modicum of sense. But from no other POV.
SO MUCH SMOKING
So, so much. |
CAST AND CAMEOS
Was this Virginia Madsen's last leading role?
I mean, she's starred in a hundred things since Candyman and is or was definitely an A-lister, I just mean as a lead. I'm sure I'm forgetting something big - please feel free to correct/ abuse me in the comments. On the strength of this performance, though, she should have gotten more. (She was a great Queen Hippolyta in the underrated Wonder Woman animated movie.)
Worf's brother / Adult Jake Sisco as the title character. |
Jodi Foster's FBI buddy from The Silence of the Lambs. |
Also an accomplished director of her own. |
This guy. Man! I had that sweater. Never that haircut, though. |
Xander Berkeley, last seen in these pages in my 80s Twilight Zone overview. |
RIP, Stanley DeSantis. |
Steve Sanders' young friend from that one episode of Beverly Hills 90210. |
Vanessa Williams (not the "Saved the Best for Last" singer). |
And Carolyn Lowery, who never went on to too much else, but hey, now she has achieved Scenic Route immortality. |
"Candyman ain't real. Come on, people."
- Dawn Byrd McMillan, 2010 (and ongoing)
~
(1) Oh, man ... haven't seen this in probably fifteen years. Great movie, though, for sure.
ReplyDelete(2) Those "Cooley High" screencaps are perfectly acceptable, provided you don't click on them. Even then, hey, not everything can be pristine.
(3) "The Candyman, a murderous soul with a hook for a hand, is accidentally summoned to reality by a skeptic grad student researching the monster's myth." -- You'd (or, at least, I'd) never guess this movie is worth a flip based on that description. Well, I'm sure the inevitable reboot will be tripe, so hang onto it for that, I guess.
(4) Man, you outdid yourself with these screencaps. I'm gonna poach every single one of them.
(5) I believe Dawn is probably right about Candyman not being real, but I'm going to keep assuming he is. It seems safer that way.
(6) Among its other virtues, I am a fan of the score by Philip Glass.
(2) It's an underrated film.
Delete(4) Glad you enjoyed! Any film set in Chicago has the advantage of basically just pointing a camera anywhere and so long as it's in focus, it's a cool shot. That's about all this damn city has going for it: its easy photogenic-ness. (And the Art Institute.)
(5) I forget what initially occasioned said comment, but to this day every now and again one of us will remind the other that Candyman ain't real. Still makes me laugh. I can't remember why, exactly, but those are the best jokes sometimes.
(6) Oh yeah! Totally didn't mention the score, my bad. Certainly a memorable feature of the film.
I always forget this is based on a Clive Barker story. One of these days, I'm going to read me a bunch of Barker. I read a few of his novels back in the day and enjoyed them.
DeleteNew numbers!
ReplyDelete(1) I rewatched this yesterday for the first time in freaking forever, and looking back over your post, I'm struck anew by how great these screencaps are. A beautiful film, definitely.
(2) Sorry, I have to mention this. I just finished eating what may have been the single most delicious apple I have ever had. I bought four of the same kind at Publix the other day, and I'm fighting off the urge to go eat every single one of them and collapse into some kind of apple coma. This has fuck-all to do with "Candyman," of course.
(3) "High-waisted jeans were ubiquitous, of course, but thankfully no more." -- I think they may be making a comeback. I've seen 'em at work a few times recently on college-age girls. One of them was wearing them in the form of cutoff jean shorts, which was a truly strange sight.
(4) I agree that the throngs of folks from Cabrini Green showing up at Helen's funeral doesn't make much sense. I mean, they burnt her alive! And they did it because she'd kidnapped (and presumably murdered) the lady's baby! So really, I'm not sure they have any reason to think that she's done any sort of good deed when she comes crawling out of the pyre with the infant. I guess I can let it slide by rationalizing that they find Candyman's body or something once the fire goes out, and suss out that Helen was innocent of everything. That's a stretch, but it's the only thing that would make a lick of sense.
Even so, it's not a dealbreaker for me. Some Hollywood bullshit at the end of an otherwise excellent movie.
(5) I think Virginia Madsen ought to have made a few more horror movies. She could have easily become a scream queen. I mean, she's done alright for herself as is, but still. Remember that time she played Dana Scully for the entirety of season seven of "The X-Files" and nobody noticed? That happened, right?
(3) You are right, and I wish you weren't. This surprises me. Then again, bellbottoms came back briefly and now seem to be gone again. Maybe all these 70s-collar shirts and jackets I have will come back around. (Wait, we donated everything in that closet to the Salvation Army, never mind.) A friend of mine who is a fairly busty gal once went off on high waisted jeans on facebook, complaining that (her words) they were only good for flat chested girls who had no butt. This is info I never know what to do with. I guess it has to do with the length of one's torso vs. width of ass or something. I have no idea.
Delete(5) Ha! I had to google that and got a laugh at all that came up. Nice.
I finally circled around to the unrated cut of this which I've got on Blu-ray. (My previous round of comments were based on the theatrical cut on that same Blu-ray.) I'm not sure I noticed any actual differences in the cut except that maybe when you see the flashback of the kid who got killed in the bathroom, it's a little bloodier.
ReplyDeleteOne of the things that struck me on this viewing is that while it's a really hard movie to get a handle on in terms of exactly what it means, that's not really a bad thing. Whether this was due to writer/director Bernard Rose not actually knowing what he wanted to say or whether instead it's due to a genius-level subtlety on his part, I do not know. But I think the result is that it's a movie that never quite gives itself all the way up, which keeps it seeming fresh. Dated, but also timeless somehow. Pretty nifty achievement, even if it is accidental.
I was also struck anew by just how quickly the movie turns on a dime. It's like, one second Helen is an ambitious-but-not-too-sensible grad student investigating an urban legend, and then next she's having a conversation with an immortal boogeyman in a parking garage. And then, in the literal blink of an eye, she's covered in blood inside an apartment and her life is forever altered. Never gonna be a safe or sane moment for her again.
And really, that happened at some point even before the parking garage. Not sure exactly the moment I'd pin it down to, and that's another of the movie's lures, because you could probably have a lengthy conversation trying to pin it down and never quite manage to figure it out.
Good stuff. I think this one grows on me every time.
That's a good angle: there's enough unexplained mystery there to resist feeling dated. Sort of like wiggle room built into doorframes for the expansion and retraction of wood with the weather. Or something.
DeleteGood points, all! Yeah it's a good movie. I've still never seen any of the sequels.
Me either. I will definitely see the new one if it ever actually comes out; I'm less enthusiastic about the sequels themselves, but I feel obliged. And the second one is supposedly pretty good in its own right, so I ought to track that down.
Delete