(1993) |
Is that a great cover or what? I'm not sure if someone planted a scarecrow in the middle of the road or if the damn thing is out for a midnight unicycling run. Either would be freaky to find yourself face-to-face with on some moonlit stretch of road.
Arguably and unfortunately none of the stories within Nightmares and Dreamscapes live up to the awesomeness of the cover. A couple get close or are iconic in their own way. What it is is a pretty good collection of B-sides, and that makes it more fun than it otherwise would be. (Arguably - and only if you get a kick out of B-sides, I guess, which I do.)
The author mentions in his introductory remarks that this was it as far as his "old stuff" was concerned; if a story he'd published wasn't here or in Night Shift or Skeleton Crew, it wasn't getting collected. With the exception of "The Cat From Hell" in Just After Sunset, I think he's stuck to that.
My ten favorites are below; the rest I'm kind of indifferent to. There are only two stories I officially dislike: "Dedication" (I'm still struck by the central unreality of the idea, plus how gross it is) and "The Moving Finger" (was this some kind of reaction on the author's part to the rectal exams of one's 40s?)
"Umney's Last Case" probably deserves a mention as it's a fun little story. That might be my eleventh entry/ honorable mention. And then there's "My Pretty Pony."
This didn't make my top ten, but there's an awful lot round the edges here: (1) According to King in his afternotes, this one broke a spell of writer's block, so he has real affection for it. He also mentions how "some things that had really been working well for me" weren't anymore. This is interesting King bio-stuff, considering the year it was written. (2) It's (presumably) all that remains of a discarded Bachman novel. (3) Jerry Garcia reads the audiobook for it. And (4) it was originally part of a Whitney Museum of American Art writer-and-artist series as the textual accompaniment to a collaboration with Barbara Kruger, "an oversized fine press slip-cased book with stainless steel cover, digital clock, nine lithographs, eight screenprints, and one lithograph with screenprint."
That is an awful lot of covering fire for a perfectly harmless but relatively slight bit of prose from America's Schlockmeister. (This would be the contemporaneous 1989 assessment, trust me.) It may even lend the story more mystique than it can live up to. Mostly, though, I just don't think anyone ever counted off seconds with a "pretty pony" between them, as the title alludes to. (i.e. one-pretty-pony, two-pretty-pony, etc.) We all know "Mississippi" and "one-thousand" but I just think he made this one up. Why? What a dumb thing to make up. It's like coming up with an alternate name for "Tuesday" and then pretending there are people out there who use it. Why? Anyone who says "Oh, sure I've heard that before" is a damn liar. If he or she even exists.
Okay, justice dispensed. Let's dive in. You're on your own for plot recaps. First up is a tie:
10.
"Dolan's Cadillac" / "End of the whole Mess"
"Dolan's" is a strange one. So's "End of the Whole Mess" too, actually, but let's start with "Dolan's." Is it just a "simple" little revenge tale? Just a "Cask of Amontillado" homage? A metaphor of some kind? (If so, what for?) Or is it a confessional about this guy King got rid of in the desert one time, and all the hardcore highway department research that led up to it? All of the above?
The movie seems to be adapting some other story entirely. I can't see how Dolan is even trapped in this thing, for one. Full confession: I've never been able to finish this one. Is it good? Bad? A reasonable adaptation? An unreasonable piece of turd-dipped baloney? You be the judge. Fair review of the film here. |
It's not perfect - the imagined dialogue(s) with his dead wife could've been eliminated, I think. Or perhaps the reader could only "hear" Robinson's side of it. That would have been my advice, as an advance reader. (Cut to headline: "Thanks a lot, jerk" says Famous Author.) It's pretty easy to visualize it all, even the somewhat elaborate arc of descent type stuff. I like stuff set in the desert, I think; it might be as simple as that.
Is it weird that there are two stories (this and "The Doctor's Case") that have this kind of visual-trick/ Coyote-painted-tunnel sort of trick as their twist? Maybe it's not weird but awesome. It's too bad King never fleshed out a Magic Eye murder-at-the-mall mystery to make it a thematic trilogy.
"End of the Whole Mess" is a fun one for me, or as fun as dystopian fatalism masquerading as utopian what-if-ing (a genre for which I am admittedly an apologist) can be, I guess. I love that King asks himself these questions and imagines this whole admirably-constructed set of answers for them, (see "The Jaunt" and so many other places), and then introduces the whole EC/ Twilight Zone twist of it all, with the "Ah, but Alzheimer's!" aspect. (And that this is forecast with the mayor of the Alzheimers town always doing the Rodney Dangerfield bit at the coffee shop is a nice touch.) Does it work? YMMV. Is it too EC-y? Not for me. (Few things are too EC-y to me, truth be told.)
The episode of the N and D mini-series isn't bad. Actually, it probably is bad; that whole mini-series hasn't aged well. But it's an odd slice of TV, and I like the oddness of it. And the ending is effectively sad. It reminds me of a lost episode of The Ray Bradbury Theater actually, more than anything.
"I
didn't need to turn on cable news (what a friend of mine had taken to
calling The Organ Grinder of Doom) to know what Bobby was talking about.
(...) People had taken to calling the Tijuana crossing point in
California Little Berlin on account of the wall."
Prescient as ever, Sai King! |
9.
"The Ten O Clock People"
"The Ten O Clock People"
Previously I felt this story seemed like a good beginning to something more than a good completed something. This time around I guess I still feel that way, but not as acutely. I like it either way. Not much to say, really.
8.
"Sneakers"
King has some stories where for my money he chases after something he doesn't quite reach (“Blind Willie” from Hearts in Atlantis) or perhaps it’s that the objective of the chase is simply too oblique (“The Things They Left Behind” from Just After Sunset, or "Blind Willie" again). “Sneakers” probably fits either of those descriptions: I don’t know what he’s getting at here, and his endnotes don’t really help. But it’s got atmosphere.
Also: another puzzling check for the “Stories Featuring Taking a Dump as Plot Points” column.
7.
Head Down
I can see why anyone not into baseball might skip it, but it’s a nice slice-of-life story. King returns to his one of his first writing gigs – when he was a sports reporter in high school – for this tale of a 1989 Little League team on its way to becoming Maine State Champions.
On the team? Future major leaguer Matt Kinney, as well as future author Owen King. |
6.
"Suffer the Little Children"
Here’s an early riff (1972) on a theme King returns to (“Bad Little Kid”, “A Death" "Sometimes They Come Back", The Dead Zone, etc.) more than a few times in his career: the ol' looks-like-the-protagonist-is-doing-a-bad-thing-but-we-the-reader-know-differently business. I like it.
Described as both an effective chiller and as something “with no redeeming social merit whatsoever” by the author himself, I agree and disagree, respectively. (I see plenty of redeeming social merit and real-world-relevance in this one.)
5.
"It Grows on You"
King excels in bringing small town Maine to life, replete with rich backstories for all involved, and his Castle Rock collected work is like some reverse-image version of Lake Wobegon. The two fictional townships have more in common than one might think, actually. Someone should do a side by side story. I’d do it, but we’d all be in the grave waiting for me to finish such a thing. I’d like to read it, though. (And I'd especially like to read some Alan Moore LXG mash-up of the two. Damn it! Too late now.)
All the worlds hinted at in Joe Newell’s origins and musings, here, are compelling. And this story contains some of King’s most memorable prose of Nightmares. To wit:
"In January of 1921 Cora gave birth to a monster with no arms and it was said a tiny clutch of perfect fingers sticking out of one eyesocket. It died less than six hours after mindless contractions had pushed its red and senseless face into the light."
Eeesh. Or how about:
"She was a grainbag of a woman, incredibly wide across the hips, incredibly full in the butt, yet almost flatchested as a boy and possessed of an absurd little pipestem neck upon which her oversized head nodded like a strange pale sunflower. Her cheeks hung like dough, her lips like strips of liver, her face was as silent as a full moon on a winter night. She sweated huge dark patches around the armholes of her dresses even in February." *
This description of Cora goes against the role she plays in the protagonists’ reverie, where she’s more of like a Castle Rock Gogonzola figure (from Fellini's 8 1/2 and elsewhere.) A very interesting work and an underrated rate for my money.
* Tell me you can't hear Garrison Keillor reading this. He narrates this whole story for me, and I wish we could arrange for him to read the entire Castle Rock collection as some kind of overpriced audio exclusive.
4.
"The Night Flier"
A pretty novel(la) take on the classic vampire story: the vampire as an aviating serial killer, with Dees and by extension the whole bloodsucking tabloid media as Renfield.
I go back and forth on the movie. When I first saw it, it was a punching-above-its-paygrade resounding success with me. Next time I saw it, it was a decent but amateurish effort. Third time, I was back to wow.
There was a fourth and fifth time but I'll spare you the play-by-play. I think my official take is "Better than it had to be, not as good as it could have been." No shame there. I applaud Mark Pavia's ambition and am basically rooting for everything he does from here on out.
3.
"Rainy Season"
"She threw it as hard as she could. It cartwheeled in the air and then splattered against the wall just opposite the kitchen door. It did not fall but stuck in the glue of its own guts."
Yep. |
A great little "time passer," as Grady Hendrix referred to it over at Tor (whose King / Dark Tower re-reads, it must be said, were underwhelming.) Nothing earth-shattering here, but it's a fun, familiar story, well-told. Same for:
2.
"Home Delivery"
Although this may be a bit less by-the-numbers than "Rainy Season," (if indeed "by the numbers" is even an accurate way to describe "Rainy Season." Whatever the case, they're numbers I like and admire, so no disrespect intended.
More small town supernatural stuff. Does it relate to Storm of the Century? Obviously not I guess, given the plot and lack of worldwide zombie mayhem in Storm. Although I wonder if there isn't an allusion or two I missed. I'm always looking for an excuse to watch Storm again, so maybe I'll cue it up.
Similar to "The Reach" a bit, from Skeleton Crew. I like that one quite a bit; I love this one.
And finally:
1.
"Chattery Teeth"
When I sat down to re-read Nightmares and Dreamscapes, I thought my favorite would probably be "The Night Flier." I was surprised how positively I responded to "Chattery Teeth." It struck me as one of those "If all other King was gone and this was all that remained, you'd get a good sense of the writer he was" sort of stories. "Home Delivery," too, for sure, perhaps all the stories mentioned above, but this one has that goofy-thing that shouldn't work (sentient-chattery-teeth-doing-their-thing) -
that does, and the reason is just how King writes it: the details he chooses, the people he populates it with, the motivations and thoughts and observations he gives them, all the scenery and context and weather. It's just a perfect little story, and so here it is, atop my personal pile of favorites this time around.
He doesn't say so in his end of book notes, but I wonder if this one came about from baby boomer rage at too much Bryan Adams and Def Leppard on the radio. Both artists come up organically, just part of the scenery I'm talking about above, but I like to speculate on such things. Did King turn on the radio one day in the 80s and fly into a mental rage at hearing either of them one too many times, or produce a mental image of a man menaced by a pair of chattery teeth? It'd be a fun angle/ origin story. He should pretend it's the case if he's ever asked about either. (Cut to headline: "'I said everything I had to say about Bryan Adams in 'Chattery Teeth'' says Author.")
I do wish he'd come up with a name for the Chattery Teeth, though. It got a bit much to read that over and over. But not so much.
~
See you next time for some Everything's Eventual action.
(1) I seem more favorable toward "N&D" than other readers, it seems. If blame has to be assigned anywhere, then it has to be the fact that a childhood raised by nervous-norvuses was the perfect unintentional setup for a frame of mind that would take an interest in anything going bump in the night. Hence a seemingly perennial disposition for most things horror related, even the B-sides.
ReplyDeleteHere's to that old line from BOC, I guess: "Time to play b-sides".
(2) At the moment I'm left wondering how much King was inspired by John Carpenter's "They Live". In fact, I'll admit it is just possible to take the cynic's view that all he's done is fashioned his own version of Carpenter's film.
All of which is to say, even if these worst suspicions are true, for some reason it just can't get in the way of my enjoyment of this piece. It's not as big as it perhaps wants to be, though I can't say that's a problem. Overall, yeah, I recommend it.
(3) "Suffer" is one of those stories that has the misfortune to grow more relevant as this century progresses, I'm afraid, though not for the reasons laid out in the story. Unless the underlying message is about the contagion of insanity, and it could always be about that very thing.
(4) "Sneakers" and "Rainy Season" are two stories I find to be generally harmless. They may not be top-tier King. However, I am willing to argue that they are decent enough examples of the smaller-scale type of story he is also capable of. Trouble is a lot of his more epic stuff keeps getting all the spotlight at the moment. Maybe when he's out of fashion, then a clearer analysis of all his short stories will be possible.
(5) I'm not sure if "Storm" and "Delivery" take place in the same universe, though I have to admit I somehow doubt it. No real reason why it should strike me that way, just sounds like the appropriate call to make. Either way, it might come closest to my second, third, or fourth favorite story in the collection.
(6) It's nice to see some love for a simple enjoyment like "Chattery Teeth". It is probably the details that help make this work as well as it does.
(7) I'm not so sure about Garrison narrating King's works, even if I do admit some interesting polar-opposite thematics going on between the two authors.
The problem is Keillor's dolorous, church-bell tones seem to offer a nice and engaging contrast when it comes to the funny and heart-warming fair of Wobegone. In contrast, I wonder if the same voice on any of King's work would just turn people off 9I know that was my immediate reaction when applying to the passage from "It Grows").
At the same time, I can't deny my curiosity to hearing how such an endeavor would turn out.
(8) "The Night Flier" has to be the closest to a favorite I have in the entire collection. I think the reason why rests all in the narratives thematic interplay. There's something in the idea of a one-dimensional leech discovering, as King says in the notes, that "column of reality has a hole in it", and that there are different kinds of leeches that make him look like an insignificant gnat.
I think the whole idea has to do with how a dysfunctional sensationalist press will sooner or later find itself a victim of the very kind of monster it helps to create, or something like that.
ChrisC.
(2) The thought definitely occurs to me as well. Both probably have their antecedent in some EC or CREEPY story, I bet.
Delete(7) Me personally I love reading that passage in my Keillor impersonation. Which admittedly has never amused anyone but me, so maybe it's an audience-of-one sort of deal. I think "dolorous, chhurch-bell tones" is a wonderful way to describe it, well done.
(8) That's a pretty good take on "The Night Flier" and I agree. I definitely think the details are very specifically chosen all to resonate around that who's-the-real-bloodsucker theme. It's a totally different vampire story than SALEM'S, too, which is something you never really read people say. I can't think of many authors who've pulled off such a feat, actually.
I'm going to be rereading this at some point in the next month or so; so I think I'll defer comment right now so I can come back and aggravate you with daily comments then!
ReplyDeleteWe'll be here. See you then.
Delete"Dolan's Cadillac" --
ReplyDeleteThis has never been a favorite King story of mine, and tonight's reread did nothing to change that. It's so fundamentally crazy a concept that I have a difficult time buying into it.
That said, it's got its merits. For example, I think King does a strong job of conveying the sheer back-spasming physical agony that goes along with Robinson's epic weekend of manual labor. You and I both know good and well that Stephen King has never engaged in manual labor of that sort in his dadgum life, and yet, here he manages to convey what seems like (even if it isn't in actuality) expert knowledge of what it means to work oneself almost literally to death.
Hard to write off a story that has that much ability to persuade. Still, not a favorite.
When I was reading it originally, I convinced myself that after getting sober, King did a bunch of kooky things and cashed in on his celebrity in creative ways, like joining a highway department for a few weeks so he could do the research for the back-breaking labor. Then when I learned he wrote it earlier than that and it was not based on experience I had to laugh - got me again, King. Like you say, his ability to make the fictional experience seem real is a gift. The gift of BS, as some put it, but charitably. An essential skill for purveyors of make believe after all. Like actors - the more credibly you fake it, the real-er an actor you are.
DeleteBruce Springsteen has a few good lines in his Broadway special on Netflix about how he made ALL of the crap about being a working-class hero up. "That's how good I am," he sums up the career's worth of lies. But they're lies that feel 100% true and are almost certainly based on keen observational skill; so might King's stuff in this story be.
Delete"The End of the Whole Mess" --
ReplyDeleteTo me, this one feels less like a story than like a story outline for a whopper of a novel King wanted to write but didn't. The ending -- with Howard's writing skills falling apart as the end nears for him -- is impactful, though; King's always good with stuff like that.
I haven't watched the tv episode in a while; I remember it being a fairly close adaptation, if nothing else.
Very true. Like FLOWERS FOR ALGERNON, almost. I wonder if that was his inspiration?
DeleteI'd be a little shocked if it wasn't.
Delete"Suffer the Little Children" --
ReplyDeleteI agree with your disagreement about King's idea of this story having no redeeming social merit. If absolutely nothing else, it makes one think, and that's not a bad outcome for ANY story.
I'd also point out that, like "Dolan's Cadillac," this is a story in which a third-grade teacher experiences quite a lot of back pain. Coincidence or not? Yeah, probably a coincidence.
That's a fun coincidence. In the same way I hope that Bruce's new album is actually a stealth-concept-adaptation of DOLAN'S CADILLAC, I hope King has a book-length third-grade-teacher-experiences-back-pain in the trunk somewhere.
Delete"The Night Flier" --
ReplyDeleteI think the story is a lot of fun, but that's a little thin in the plot area. Which is fine for a short story, where concept and tone and character can make plot kind of irrelevant. I'd argue that that's the case here. Anyways, if you can give me a moment like the one where Dees "sees" Renfield pissing recycled blood into a urinal, then man, you've gotten the job done in my book.
I love the movie. Haven't watched it in a few years; might oughta add that to my list for this Halloween. I'd never make a claim for it as high art, and it's rough around the edges, but it's also just ... persuasive. Miguel Ferrer is awesome in it, and most of what Mark Pavia added to flesh the story out works fine for me. That's a movie of which I had zero expectations the first time I saw it, and I enjoyed it so much that the shock of that discovery has always stuck with me. This means I probably value it a little more than I should. Fine by me!
"That's a movie of which I had zero expectations the first time I saw it, and I enjoyed it so much that the shock of that discovery has always stuck with me. "
DeleteSame here. So much so that when I watch it again and pick things out that don't work I actually feel bad or that I'm picking on Mark Pavia and I berate myself for it. Seriously! I don't have this problem with GRAVEYARD SHIFT, for some reason.
I mean, there definitely are things in the movie that don't work. But for me, it works quite well as a whole. I just wish Pavia had been able to make more movies; I think he's got talent, and it's a shame he hasn't been able to put it to use.
DeleteI more or less loved his second movie ("Fender Bender") when he finally got to make one. Here's hoping there'll eventually be a third!
Still have to check out FENDER BENDER. I'm with you, though, totally Team Pavia. I wish THE REAPER'S IMAGE had come together; I was really looking forward to that.
DeleteYeah, for sure. You never know, it might yet happen. If not, they should hire him to do the stories individually as part of the new "Creepshow" series.
DeleteI'd also love for that screenplay for "Night Flier 2" that he co-wrote with King to get printed someday. I'd settle for a freaking Wikipedia summary.
"It Grows On You" --
ReplyDeleteGlad to see this one making your list. I think it's a beaut. It reminds me in some ways of Lovecraft, who'd often tell stories about people who were up to no good in ways that the narrators didn't quite understand. A story built more on suspicion than on fact. I'm not sure if King was consciously trying to do that sort of thing here, but I think he might have been. Lovecraft's stories would typically involve the narrator somehow finding out more; King seems to be trying to keep things vague and mysterious the entire way through, and he mostly gets there.
Not sure if that made any sense or not, but I'm too lazy to parse it for opportunities to make improvements, so leavin' it as is!
I'm agnostic on the subject of wether Keillor would make a good narrator; I tend to take your word for it, but I myself am too unfamiliar with his work to have an opinion. The actual audio version is narrated by King himself; I've not heard it recently enough to remember it, but I'd guess he does a good job with it.
"Chattery Teeth" --
ReplyDeleteI'd remembered this as being one of my least-favorite stories in the book, but, like you, I was surprised by how much I enjoyed it on this reread. It's very well-written, and you are 100% right to point out the richness of details being a big part of the reason why the whole thing works. It absolutely shouldn't, but it all seems vaguely credible the way King writes it. This is helped by him making the main character wonder at it all; because he doesn't want to believe it but has no choice except to do so, King kind of puts us in the same position. Neat magic trick there, Uncle Steve!
That's good to hear! I had a feeling you'd enjoy this one on your own re-read.
DeleteGood thoughts on Lovecraft/ hidden intentions, as well, re: "It Grows On You."
"Sneakers" --
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't have thought to connect this one with "Blind Willie" in any way, but I think you've hit the nail on the head: they're both stories where King's chasing a dragon nobody else can see. See also "The Ballad of the Flexible Bullet," "Stationary Bike," and probably any number of others currently refusing to come to mind for me.
I don't dislike "Sneakers," but it's another one that I *always* forget everything about after a while. I doubt this time will be any different.
Yep. Although I kind of love "Stationary Bike," to be honest. I was surprised on my reread of that one how much that worked for me. I can see the object he's chasing on that one fairly clearly. While "Sneakers" and "Blind Willie" seem to have some vital info missing to tie the room together.
DeleteStill, I like "Sneakers"fine like you say, it's just one you kind of puzzle over then file away in the King mental archives.
"Flexible Bullet" does for me what "Stationary Bike" does for you. But I don't dislike any of them; they're all basically fine. I think the difference is that if I were trying to describe to someone at a party why I like, say, "Blind Willie" as opposed to a real corker like "The Jaunt," I'd be a little embarrassed while I was trying to do so. I mean, probably it wouldn't go over any better if it WAS "The Jaunt" I was talking about; I'd just feel more confident about it.
DeleteHello, my name is Bryant and I am a weirdo.
"Home Delivery" --
ReplyDeleteNo blatant connections to "Storm of the Century" (apart from the setting) so far as I can tell. However, Selena St. George -- Dolores's daughter in "Dolores Claiborne" -- is mentioned, so this likely means that nearby, Dolores is fighting zombies with whatever weapons she's got sitting around. Now, there's a thought.
This is a pretty wild story. I'm surprised nobody has ever turned it into a movie, especially in the last decade or so. I mean, you've got the President and First Lady getting turned into zombies; you've got a "Lifeforce"-esque trip into outer space; you've got local-yokel comedy; you've got a touching(ish) love story. Box-office gold!
Agreed 100%.
DeleteGood catch on Selena St. George! I missed that. And good lord, a zombie-apocalypse-sequel to DOLORES CLAIBORNE seems like such a terribly awesome idea... I wish I could make that one happen. "I'm about half past give-a-shit with your zombie games!"
I didn't know how much I needed to read that until just now. If there was a petition to make that happen that I could sign, I'd sign it.
Delete"Rainy Season" --
ReplyDeleteI can't quite get my arms around this one, for some reason. It's colorful and gross and I like the elderly-resident characters; but something about it keeps me at a distance.
Still, it's pretty good. Yet another one that needs to be an episode of this new "Creepshow" tv series.
"The Ten O'Clock People" -- I kind of agree that this is just a beginning to something, although I do love the final paragraph. It's the only part of the story I do love; this one has never been a favorite of mine, and this reread didn't do anything to change my mind.
ReplyDeleteWhich is not to say it's bad. It's got a sweaty, paranoid feel that is kind of fun. But the story does nothing that "They Live" doesn't do five times better. (That's a facile and unfair comparison, but it's one I couldn't help making, and I stand by it.)
re: "Rainy Season." I can see people not loving it. For me it's a pretty solid workout on fairly accessible exercise equipment.
DeleteI guess that description would apply to "Ten O'Clock People" too, although for me that one's a little less comprehensive a workout. This metaphor's getting away from me.
THEY LIVE really does suck up all the air in the room when it comes to this sort of thing, although for me the thing it always brings to mind is the X-Files episode "Folie A Deux." Which in my mind is a better-resolved version of even THEY LIVE. (And certainly of "Ten o'Clock People" too.)
Even after looking it up on Wikipedia, I barely remember that episode of "The X-Files." I remember it being good, though -- it's a Vince Gilligan, so it'd just about have to be.
DeleteMan, I have GOT to finish my rewatch of that series at some point. Probably I'll just start over from the top; I stalled out somewhere in season ... 4? I think? Or it may actually have been 5.
"Head Down" --
ReplyDeleteI am somewhat surprised to find myself thinking this is the best story in the entire book, even though it's not technically a story. It's, obviously, an essay. But so what? It's an essay that tells a story, so my give-a-shit as to the way it gets classified runs fairly shallow.
I think this is a heck of an interesting peek into the parallel universe where King made a career out of being a sports writer of some kind. Clearly, the guy can just flat-out WRITE, especially when he's engaged by the subject. And given how unengaged I myself am by baseball, it's a low-key miracle that he makes me care about what he's writing about here.