Okay, so October isn't over yet. But the Red Sox are in the World Series, and I think I may have wrapped up my movie-watching for this Halloween season. I could always sneak back for a round two if such a thing materializes. For now, though, I wanted to put up a few quick (downright evasive in some cases) remarks on some of the Scary Season viewing I've done over the past few weeks.
Let's take this in the order I watched them.
1.
I was inspired by The Truth Inside the Lie's October watchthrough of the Halloween franchise to revisit this one, which I hadn't seen since it first came out. I remembered hating it. This time, I did not hate it. I didn't really like it very much, but I had fun with it. For one thing, there's a Not-Dawson's-Creek vibe going on with the four teenage leads (well, one kind-of lead, one Not-Joey-Potter, one Just-Wanna-Get-Laid-Bro! cannon fodder, and one Not-Jen-Lindley-But-It-Is-Jen-Lindley love interest) that amused me throughout. ("This is the class trip... that Michael Meyers... never had... until NOW.")
Really, as 80s slasher films go, H20 is perfectly credible. Alas, it seems to be going for more of a post-Scream kind of sensibility instead of a 80s slasher film one, so that kind of works against it. Does it matter? Not really. There's lots of dumb things like Laurie shooting the gate controls or what not ("MIII-CH-AEEELL!!") and the ending corpse-napping, but I couldn't summon the vitriol for it I once had. I'm getting old.
2.
Summer of '84
(2018)
I had a recent work trip to Normal-Bloomington, IL. This was playing at the theater next to the hotel where my work conference was.
Cute little college town. |
3. and 4.
(1972) |
(1973) |
Now these two were lots of fun. I'd seen neither before. Dr. Richard Daystrom plays Prince Mamuwalde, who is converted into a vampire by none other than Dracula himself. Resurrected into 1970s Watts, he wreaks a little havoc, chases a woman who may or may not be the reincarnation of his eternal love, and inspires a memorable raid on a warehouse.
Scream, Blacula, Scream - a title which makes little sense given the plot but is pretty damn cool, and which I keep hearing in my head a la Springsteen's "Dream, Baby, Dream" - is for my money better than the first. Both are fun (and no one should be going into these expecting high cinematic art or anything, but I doubt anyone needs to be told that) but the second blends its sensibilities into a more flavorful brew.
5.
The Exorcist II: The Heretic
(1977)
Here's another one I never saw. Hey now! Pretty bonkers and very entertaining. This Bloody Disgusting write-up captures it pretty well. "While the film isn’t a great sequel to The Exorcist, it is a GREAT continuation of the daring career of director John Boorman. In a single decade, from 1972 to 1981, Boorman directed the backwoods terror of Deliverance, the trippy sci-fi of Zardoz, the New Age spirituality of Exorcist II: The Heretic, and the decidedly offbeat King Arthur film Excalibur. His dazzling visual style, insistence on unconventional stories, and narratives about men in spiritual and existential crises makes the second Exorcist film a perfect fit for his filmography."
Quite true. But beyond that it's a great 70s film. Or at least a compelling and watchable and wonderfully weird 70s film, if not great. Not by definition American New Wave, but it sits quite comfortably - if psychedelically - under that umbrella.
Apparently, William Peter Blatty hated the 2nd Exorcist so much that he was inspired to write Legion, which he brought to the screen himself as:
6.
The Exorcist III
(1990)
(1990)
Also one I'd never seen before a few weeks ago, and also a very impressive affair. I have to tip my cap to Blatty. I haven't seen his other directorial effort (The Ninth Configuration, also an adaptation of his own novel) but I was impressed enough with this that I will definitely be tracking it down. This has what I'd call an author's pace more than a director's, particularly with all the Brad Dourif scenes - and while we're here, top-notch-Dourif, this - but it works.
This purgatory scene is pretty jarring and unexpected, even without Fabio. |
What a wild ending. Definitely glad I watched this. And the 2nd one, too. This October has caused me to completely re-evaluate my estimation of this original trilogy of Exorcist films. (I think they hang together enough to call them a trilogy, even if the 3rd does its best to ignore the 2nd outright.) Compare to the first three of any other horror franchise, and you can see what I mean: this is a remarkable and unique trio of films.
(Had Rob Zombie been given the chance to remake Season of the Witch after H2, I bet that trilogy would be the only exception to this new Exorcist rule.)
7.
Mandy
(2018)
"Panos Cosmatos deftly weaves in and out of genres to execute a vision that is completely his own. Part fantasy, part science-fiction, and part comedy mixed with a generous helping of horror, Mandy is set in the primal wilderness of 1983. Red Miller (played by Cage) hunts an unhinged religious sect who burned the love of his life to death right in front of his eyes."
That's from this interview with the director, who is the son of Cobra and Tombstone (DVD residuals for which funded Panos' first film) director George P. Cosmatos, who really brings the lysergic pain here in his 2nd feature. I have not seen his first (Beyond the Black Rainbow) but after seeing Mandy, I definitely will be. What a wild ride. My buddy Jim described it as "Holy Mountain meets Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2." That's probably accurate, although even before I knew the director I felt a Cobra vibe, too. Cosmatos is definitely both cine- and smash-and-trash- literate.
A lot of 21st century horror films get too extreme for my tastes. Mandy hits all those boxes but brings the kind of aesthetics to get a viewer like me over the hump. I was very impressed with this film - just the right mix of details, just the right mix of genres. Nic Cage (and everyone else in the cast and crew) wins the Dog Star Omnibus Award for Halloween 2018.
8.
Little Shop of Horrors
(1986)
Sometimes I must give the impression that if it came out in the 80s, I'll find something to like about it. That is not always the case. Take this one, for example. I remember liking it fine enough back in the day and thought myself clever for unpacking the (perfectly obvious) subtext. But this viewing was painful for me. My apologies to its champions, but I found it kind of dreadful.
I do still like the dentist tune. Steve Martin - those Father of the Bride paychecks aside - never does wrong. Everyone else, though, sheesh. I never quite got Ellen Greene either - not just here but everywhere I've seen her. It's difficult to describe, but it's a specific type of performance/ character she's doing. It's like she's a woman playing a drag queen - not in a derogatory way. I just can't think of any other way of describing it.
9.
(1954) |
A well-deserved classic. I don't know how many times I've seen this over the years, but I think only two or three times have I deliberately set out to watch it. I'm always impressed with the quality of the underwater photography and the general atmosphere.
I apologize for not googling the subject thoroughly, but this time around I was struck with how Queer Theory everything seemed. (Is this still a term? It's likely been changed and "Queer Theory" is now a thoughtcrime term. Who can keep up with our enlightened gatekeepers of the media-academe? I submit to the Will of Landru.) The Creature is a manifestation of the two male leads' desire for one another, which is sublimated a million different ways throughout the movie.
If Camille Paglia hasn't written an essay on this movie she should. (And ditto for Attack of the 50 Foot Woman.) |
All that aside, it's a fun movie, too, I'm just saying.
10.
The Omen III: The Final Conflict
(1981)
Often referred to round the Dog Star Bullpen as "The only Omen worth keeping." Which is meant to be amusingly overstated but comes across as unnecessarily harsh to the first two Omens. Really, what it comes down to is: The Omen III was the one I saw as a kid (had to totally sneak it, and it messed me up for weeks).
Here's some of my notes from this Halloween's rewatch:
- These first couple of murders are quite memorable. (The former US ambassador is supernaturally driven to rig himself a shotgun suicide, and a would-be antichrist-killer is suspended and swung through some tarp or something that immediately catches fire to a chorus of screams.)
- Goldsmith's soundtrack echoes Alexander Nevsky. I swear, that thing is always popping up.
- It's just too bad no one in this We Were Created For One Thing... Priest League has any kind of rifle with a scope.
- "Slay the Nazarene, and you will know the violent raptures of my father's kingdom."
- Another one: "Your son has become an apostle of the antichrist." Oh man! The ultimate doctor's appointment. "Only time will tell, but it looks like your son has a condition we call 'Under the Thrall of Satan.'"
- The murdering babies montage is pretty wild. So many Satanists! But, this all happens in a week? From birth to this, in a week? We see one Mom all dressed up and in church getting the kid baptized. Which admittedly isn't the most unheard of thing in the world, but all in all, it's a bit of a stretch. But hey.
- The film really stitches together some horrifying sequences and covers a lot of ground. I mean, the second coming of Jesus is a plot ploint. Sodomy, deeply evil beagles, stars aligning, the prophecy of birthmarks (always a wtf), deeply evil rotweilers, steam-ironing baby's faces (off-camera, alas), and way more. Kudos to all involved.
11.
(1980) |
Like a lot of people my age, I saw this as a kid and it freaked me out but good. My mind kept working on it to try and figure out the mystery of the images. It was a very scary riddle to solve. In many ways, repeated viewings of Watcher in the Woods in the 1983 - 1984 time range probably taught me more about both ghost story tropes and the vocabulary of cinematic narrative (the stuff we all take for granted but basically learning how to watch a movie: it's a process many don't examine. And hey, that's cool - this isn't a dis or anything. Sheesh.)
Anyway, after watching it a dozen times in the 80s if not more, I saw it once in the 90s and all I could see were the cliches and the tropes and the rather one-dimensional performances from Lynn-Holly Johnson et al. I think I caught just enough of it somewhere or sometime in the 00s and thought Oh I was just being douchey back in the 90s; this is fine. This time around, I think it's more than fine. From the very start you know what's going on and what's going to happen - or nearly. It's all intentionally very familiar. But it builds upon itself very satisfyingly, there are some genuine scares and memorable imagery:
And even when the big reveals begin to happen, they still manage some shocks and twists that don't feel schlocky. YMMV, but I give this one a solid "A" or "A-."
And is this the coolest lightning sound on film? Possibly.
12.
In the Mouth of Madness
(1994)
John Carpenter's wild ride from Halloween through Ghosts of Mars * includes two legitimately unsung horror classics: Prince of Darkness and this movie. Horror fans have always loved them, I just mean the world at large.
* The fertile crescent of this initial run is undoubtedly only through They Live in 1988, but I'm being generous. Besides, Ghosts of Mars is wonderful, awful fun.
On previous rewatches, I had a nitpick here and there. This time, though, everything hung together much better for me. Am I a better viewer now? Have my senses been dulled by the onrush of middle age? Do I just know more about Lovecraft on this rewatch than I ever did? I think it might be that last one. Nevertheless, an impressive achievement. I'll take it over revisiting much the same concept in "Cigarette Burns."
And finally:
13.
It's the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown
(1966)
With the kids. Good times as always. That Snoopy vs. Red Baron stuff and subsequent plot development is all just too great. I've got Snoopy vs. the Red Baron for the PS2 (perhaps I should have prefaced this by saying "I've still got a PS2") but haven't been able to tempt my girls just yet. But I think we made some progress towards that with this season's viewing(s) of Great Pumpkin.
~
Happy Halloween, all!
(1) There are many, many worse things in life than not being able to be vitriolic in one's opinions. I aspire to that!
ReplyDelete(2) "Summer of '84" sounds like the "Krull" of this eighties-nostalgia boom. Which is probably not enough to induce me to see it.
(3-4) Those have officially been added to my list.
(5) I suspect that if I'd been there at the time it came out, I'd have hated "The Heretic" and would still be spewing invective about it to anyone who would listen. Divorced from the actual need for it to be any good, I watched it this year and found it be ... pretty good! Or at least interesting, which is sometimes enough.
(6) I'm planning to watch the third "Exorcist" in the next few days. I hear the Paul Schraeder version of the fourth one is also pretty good, AND I hear the recent television "adaptation" is pretty good. So apparently the "Exorcist" franchise is stronger than I ever gave it credit for being after the first film.
(7) My Blu-ray of "Mandy" is scheduled to arrive on October 30, and I am scheduled to watch it on October 31.
(8) I have not seen "Little Shop of Horrors" since the late eighties. I didn't care for it then, but I'd still kind of like to revisit it at some point, even though it doesn't work for you. If nothing else, I could get excited about how utterly right late-eighties Bryant had been.
(9) Embarrassingly, I have never seen "The Creature from the Black Lagoon." I'm weak on the Universal movies in general. I keep managing not to buy a recent collection that came out on Blu-ray that contains all 30 -- 30!!! -- of them. I won't be able to resist that temptation forever.
(10) Never seen any of the Omens except the first, but I like that one, and I have it on the good authority of both this blog and one of my best friends that I would/will dig the third one.
(11) Never seen "The Watcher in the Woods," but I want to. (And God help me, but I actually HAVE seen that "Superboy" series promoed at the top of that tv clip. Pretty bad.)
(12) I love "In the Mouth of Madness." It was probably his last legitimately great movie. I'm kinda halfway planning a full rewatch of Carpenter's entire filmography for next year. I've still only seen "Ghosts of Mars" once, but in my memory it is green, and I bet a rewatch will confirm it.
(13) Impossible to do justice with words how much I love the best of those Peanuts specials. This one and the Christmas one may as well be fused into my DNA. And I like the Thanksgiving one a lot, too, actually.
A strong month's viewing! Best of luck with the Series.
Thank you!
Delete(2) "The Krull of 80s nostalgia films" - I don't even think it rises to THAT! That's funny, though.
(6) Dawn and I watched both versions of that Exorcist prequel and damned if I can remember anything about them. One of these days I'll get back round to it.
(7) Looking forward to your thoughts!
(9) I jsut got the 2-disc set that has this one, Frankenstein, Bride of Frankenstein, Phantom of the Opera, The Mummy, The Wolf Man, The Invisible Man. I'd like to ownt hem all, though, having all 30 would be cool. While we're here, I've got a nice 2-disc Hammer Horror set too that I totally meant to break into this month but couldn't find the time. So it goes. Hopefully next year.
(11) I had the damnedest time trying to insert a Watcher in the woods trailer. There's a pretty good one on YouTube and I kept thinking that was the one I grabbed, then I'd hit publish and be like what the hell is this, now... This promo one was the closest I could get to a trailer. I like anything that reminds me of how the tv-set up (with UHF and horror-movie hosts and all of it) used to be, so I kept it. Now, for SUPERBOY, oh man! People forget. I thought the girls might enjoy that one, though, as I remembered it as relatively G-rated and they like the Super-mythos. So I, uh, ended up with it somehow, and we watched 2 or 3 episodes. Yeah.... not good.
(12) I think you're right about "ITMOM" (ha on that abbreviation!) being his last legit-great movie. "Ghosts of Mars" is more great the way certain Kiss songs are great.
(1) Like I said, I can find "H20" watchable alright. The interesting thing is "H40".
ReplyDeleteIf I had to give a basic summary of my thoughts, it would be as follows: Alright ya old devil, you've probably ended it the only way it could go. In fact, it does, to an extant, create an interesting (albeit perhaps unintended) sense of symmetry and a sense of coming full circle to Carpenter's whole oeuvre.
It even sort of helps establish a central motif underlying most of his work: the mental institution. Looked at from this perspective, it almost begs to see Carpenter's best work in terms of the horrors of the inner mind as the basic guiding theme to his work. This is interesting in terms of films "Big Trouble", "They Live" or "The Thing", which seem more outer-directed in their plots. Still, I'm willing to call this film a success. I just think it'll only hold if no more sequels are made.
2. Summer of 84 seems to have skipped right past my radar. In fact, my first thought when looking at the screencap was that you were talking about some old, early Matthew Broderick film.
I even read that Ebert.com review and thought it was from the actual critic. My thought was: "Wow, he really was pretty good if he could sum up "Ready Player One" years before it was ever publish or released in theaters". Shows what I know. I guess I'll have to decide on this film myself.
(3) I haven't seen "Mandy", however, I have read and seen good comments for "Black Rainbow". It's a slow burn film sort of deal, it seems.
(4) That's a vibe I've never gotten from "Black Lagoon". I always see it more as a Lovecraft sort of riff, for what it's worth.
(5) I like "Watcher" as well. What I find interesting here, though, is how your reaction has changed over time. I bring this up because it reminds me of the reactions of a younger viewer who devoted some time to the film.
https://vimeo.com/99211069
I know disagree with his take on the flick, however, I wonder if time and tide might change his tune as well. He's got a pretty good opening theme montage (it's at the 1:05 mark), though, if nothing else.
(6) I also dug "ITMOM" as well. For me, the film is all about a meta-fictional commentary about writing and the horror genre in general. What's remarkable is how light-hearted Carpenter is about the whole thing. This genuinely comes off to me as one of the director's most light-hearted efforts after "Big Trouble in Little China".
That might sound ridiculous to some, yet is was clear to me that the whole thing was being approached with tongue firmly in cheek. I'm always left with the idea that I've watched the most entertaining shaggy dog story ever.
(7) If you don't like Charlie Brown, then I suppose it's good marker for that person to be considered more clinical than Old Chuck himself. Either way, pretty good list. Happy Halloween!
ChrisC.
(1) Is H40 the new one? Is that what folks are calling it?
Delete(5) It's funny - I was watching a"Watcher" review a few nights ago and agreed with lots of it, but I kept thinking, where have I heard this guy before? Then I clicked on his page and I was like oh, it's that Nostalgia Critic dude that ChrisC likes! I thought that might be the same thing I watched that you posted, but the one I watched was only like 5 minutes long.
I hasn't heard "Escape" by Journey in awhile.
(6) You know, for as dark as ITMOM is, it sure does have kind of a light touch feel to it. I think he was trying to do something similar with ESCAPE TO L.A., but that one seemed to get away from him.
And thanks, Chris - happy Halloween backatcha!
Delete(1) To be clear, Carpenter didn't make this new movie. He consulted on the story (including talking them out of a REALLY bad idea involving Loomis) and co-wrote the score, but otherwise this is not a John Carpenter movie.
Delete(6) I'd never thought of "In the Mouth of Madness" as light-hearted, at least not consciously; but it kind of is, isn't it? Gleeful in a way.
Something about Sam Neill's performance, maybe? It's tough to put my finger on. But yeah, gleefully evil or something, that also works.
DeleteIt's probably got something to do with what Chris is referring to with the meta aspects. It's baked into the story that you can feel an authorial presence looming over everything; this presence is, perhaps, not entirely benevolent or sane, but IS very much enjoying itself. Sort of a wings-from-flies type of situation.
DeleteThat's not it, exactly, I think; but something like that.
Also, the end-credits music probably helps to reinforce that tone as the curtain comes up. If the movie had darker, "Prince of Darkness"-esque score as the credits rolled, maybe that would shift things a bit.
Either way, great movie.
And I agree: not liking Charlie Brown is certainly a litmus test of some kind.
DeleteI'm going to put this out there: in addition to all the usual citizenship stuff, I'd add familiarity with a handful of American pop cultural artifacts of the 20th century. Not just to be familiar with them but to take them into your very soul and DNA and worldview. At least 3 of the Peanuts specials would be here (Great Pumpkin, Thanksgiving, Christmas), although my personal favorite/ eternal-flame-of-being-8-years-old foundation is "Bon Voyage Charlie Brown."
I'd also make this a requirement of citizens who are born here. Everyone should have to pass some kind of Peanuts ceremony. I'll add Raiders here, too, and certain Looney Toons specials. I can imagine pissing both the extreme right off and the extreme left, and that's probably a sign that it's something we should all commit to. There is no downside.
Radical centrists unite!
Delete"Bon Voyage Charlie Brown" is great, for sure. "A Boy Named Charlie Brown," too. Both of those almost feel like they've gotten lost, though; it's the lack of yearly network-television viewings, probably.
Can you imagine the hearings that would have to be held over what specific pieces of pop culture would be made mandatory? Those would be contentious. I'd watch it all on C-SPAN.
Those hearings would be insane. I can only imagine the grandstanding and the testimony.
DeleteI watched "The Exorcist III" tonight. I definitely liked it, and I definitely think it is a quality bit of filmmaking; but even so, I don't quite know how to feel about it. There's arguably just as much WTF here as in "The Heretic," which is saying something. But it's also incredibly well-acted (Dourif is out-of-this-world good) and fairly scary.
ReplyDeleteI've been wrong about these things before, but it feels to me as if the only direction my opinion of this one is going is up. It definitely doesn't feel like a locked-in opinion, that's for sure.
Apparently Samuel L. Jackson has a bit role in there somewhere; I've got to be on the lookout for that the next time I watch it.
It's a very impressive cinematic achievement for a novelist, it seems to me. Someone should make a list - all my brain is coming up with right now is MAXIMUM OVERDRIVE and then the subsequent AC/DC drowns out all other thought and I just want to type in random lyrics from "Who Made Who" - but EXORCIST III has got to be near the top of such a list, for sure. It's a very interesting film. I look forward to seeing it again.
DeleteI watched "Mandy" tonight, and regret to inform that I did not care for it. It may be that the conditions under which I watched the movie (on a smaller television than my own, with a group of very chatty friends, and with micronaps besieging me the entire time) had a negative impact, but at the end I was just kind of glad for it to be over.
ReplyDeleteI feel like a traitor! Probably ought to give it another look.
No kidding! I'm surprised to hear that. Those conditions don't seem ideal, no, but hey. Maybe you'll turn the corner on it down the road - or maybe I'll re-assess down the road, who knows.
DeleteAt the moment, though, I quite enjoyed it, and it all hung together nicely to me. To cross-reference to your other email, a film that takes for its ethos the "hey the world is a violent piece of shit and I'm going to rub your nose on it you ignoring lazy piece of puke!" approach has to have other things going on within it for me to get on board. MANDY had many other things going on, and a good bit of humor, albeit highly contextualized, so that appealed to me. It's the type of "extreme' horror film I can hang with, whereas something like ROGUE RIVER or what-sounds-like 31 from your review, not so much.
I didn't even find the violence to be especially upsetting. I thought it was fairly innocuous in that regard.
DeleteI think my problem with the movie is that I felt an effort on the filmmakers' part to stand up in front of everyone watching the movie and declaim a complete lack of need for sense to be made. It felt to me like they were really proud of how little sense they'd been able to allow in past the gates on this one.
Which is an uncharitable -- and probably incorrect -- way of looking at it. But that's how it's striking me as of now.
What didn't make sense? Everything hung together okay for me. The viewer had to supply certain bits of background or make some deductions, sure, but I think it was all there. The unsupplied answers were all suggested enough for me. But, it's entirely possible I missed one or several things, so let me know! Maybe what I thought was subtle was actually just sloppy, or, as you suggest, an intentional evasion.
Delete