9.01.2018

The Shining (Opera)



"Jack Torrance thought: Officious little prick."
 - first words of King's The Shining.

"Hi, I've got an appointment with Mr. Ullman. My name is Jack Torrance.
- first words of Kubrick's The Shining.

"You've got to watch her. She creeps." *
- first words of King's script for The Shining miniseries.

"Did you remember the parking brake?" *
- first words of The Shining, the opera.


* More or less.

This one will be somewhat tough to discuss, as there's no CD, no DVD, and a paucity of YouTube links to the production. A shame - and a bit of a mystery. Why no official recording? Why no film of the performance? Why have no other performances opened anywhere after the initial run? No opera company anywhere in the world wants to put on The Shining? Are the rental fees too high? The run in St. Paul sold out each night. Multiply that by any opera market that knows King's work (a lot) and you'd figure there'd be mutual profit and interest. None of these things add up to me. What is the rationale for keeping this off the market? 

I'll try my best, though. First things first: this is terrific stuff. When it comes to contemporary opera, I know virtually nothing. Through supplemental reading, repeat listening, and strategic use of Robert Greenberg's How To Listen To and Understand OperaI've learned a bit about opera over the past year, but it's been 99% traditional repertoire stuff. I had not, for example, heard of either the composer (again, Paul Moravec) or the librettist (Mark Campbell).


Above, with director Simonson and conductor Michael Christie.

A few seconds googling revealed oh hey, these guys are not just very well-known but highly accomplished, top-of-their-field personalities. Very much an honor to have these guys bring your work to the stage. It's a bit like King getting adapted by... well, Kubrick, I guess. (Except - as is mentioned in each and every press release I could find on the Shining opera - part of securing the rights to the book included making it clear that it was adapting the novel and not the movie. King's never going to let that one go. Of all the hills to die on, Kubrick's The Shining is King's Dien Bien Phu.)

Anyway, I very much look forward to checking out more of the creators' work. That also goes for the leads: Brian Mulligan as Jack Torrance and Kelly Kaduce as Wendy Torrance. 


Both carry the opera more or less on their shoulders. The real treat of the opera if you're a fan of either the novel (or the film, or even the miniseries... I guess) is seeing these characters brought to life with such intensity from the leads. Opera fits the novel well. The composer and librettist both seize upon this to great effect, which allows the leads to bring the characters - familiar to so many of us - to new life while still being recognizable. 

British critic Michael Eaton listed the three rules of effective adapation as (1) the geography can be jettisoned if the sociological ground base is preserved, (2) it is not the significance of the characters as written but the structural relationships between them that should remain fixed, and (3) thematic coherence is the essential springboard. Quibble with them if you like (myself, I think point two is too slippery-slope-y) but by his or any standard of adaptation, everyone involved here did a remarkable job of it. But special credit to Mark Campbell; I don't think it's overstating it to say of the three attempts to translate the book into another medium (one of them by King himself) he might have done the book the most justice.

(The polar opposite of this sort of understanding is something the Wall Street Journal wrote in its review: "(The opera) elevates the story from a horror to a human drama." Clearly written by someone who has never read the novel.) 


Anyway, Kalduce and Mulligan are both fantastic. The cast is rounded out (among others) by Arthur Woodley as Dick Hallorhan, David Walton as Delbert Grady, and Mark Walters as Mark Torrance. They each get time in the spotlight and knock it out of the park. I wish I could cue up particular moments from their songs, but alas. Grady in particular brings some comic menace to his scenes. And the Don Giovanni-like appearance of Mark Torrance is a highlight of the whole show.

Sorry no screencap, but here's Doc (Alejandro Vega) and Woodley's Hallorhan.

One last word on the adaption before moving on to the music itself: Jack's struggle with learning that it's his son that the Overlook is really after and that he's just being manipulated to maneuver Danny into place is fleshed out better here than in any other place. Perhaps not the novel, but that's to be expected. Of course, the novel didn't have aria, duet, and chorus to work with either. Especially with this score.


If you just listened to the music, you might be forgiven for thinking Danny (and Toby's) presence was too drastically reduced. But on the contrary, Danny is the pivotal on-stage role: it's just that as a child he can't carry the musical score so he has to be used strategically. And he is - to great effect. But visually and stage-wise, as far as how his presence ends or moves scenes along, he is the key piece on the chessboard, just as in the novel.


Okay, so let's get to the music. It was described as "a haunting score by Paul Moravec, sparing in its use of melody in its quest for mounting tension and suspense" by Alan Kopischke for USA Today. And it is certainly that. This is operatic score in the constant-musical-momentum mode, and not quite the Verdi or Wagner mode, with orchestral flourishes that call attention to themselves and/or standalone songs you might be whistling on your way out of the opera house.

After 3 listens - and boy, it'd be nice to crank the CD or blu-ray from their respective delivery mechanisms but hey! - I think my initial impression (this is great music) stands. Is considerably deepened, in fact. Listen to this. You can see some of the production at that link, too. Once you get a sense of the score, listen to this rehearsal with only piano.


The voices blend better with the orchestra, but that's why it's an opera. I pick out a lot more about what the music is doing hearing it only on piano. Very modern sense of harmony (modern as in Stravinsky/Schoenberg) but mainly: just spooky, disorienting music. It's such an interesting way of enveloping the Overlook and this family drama. Lush but sinister, and wonderful - regal when it has to be, a cauldron of tension otherwise. 

I loved every number where the Overlook ghosts appear, and Jack and Wendy have some nice duets. Robert Greenberg has described the opera composer as an architect who gathers his materials based on the direction he's given from the subject matter, not someone who sits down, magically inspired, and develops an opera in a coherent fashion. He chooses his materials - so many arias, a duet here, a chorus there - by what he needs to accomplish. Such is the case here, it seems to me; Moravec and Campbell chose wisely. I'd love to read along with the libretto for a better report, but see above.

The stage and costume design (by Erhard Rom and Karin Kopischke respectively) looked pretty good from the glimpses I've seen.

A few words on the early days of trying to get King to sign off on permission to do the opera: 

"Johnson got to King’s lawyer almost immediately but negotiations stalled until Paul Moravec revealed that he was buddies with Peter Straub. Maybe he could make a call? The call hit paydirt (it didn’t hurt that Straub, unlike King, is an opera buff) and King signed off on the project with a few provisos: (1) Minnesota Opera could make a CD of the The Shining but not a DVD, (2) King maintained approval of the libretto, and (3) The opera had to be based on King’s book, not the Stanley Kubrick film. Done, said Johnson."

Did he show up during its opening and so far only run? Has he ever mentioned it in interviews? I found no answers to these questions.

And fair enough - should King pretend he's an opera fan? It might be as simple as that - he feels uncomfortable commenting on it. Again, fair enough - his permission to do it and relatively mild stipulations to do so is comment enough. I do, though, feel that some of the adaptations he has endorsed and promoted are done with far less panache and affection than this opera, so it's unfortunate, if only out of respect to such a respectful production, that he hasn't. Someone in the King camp should do something about this. If they haven't already - what do I know about what kind of emails and gift baskets and polar bear expeditions to Greenland have or haven't been organized behind the scenes?

And opera houses across the country should put it on! It's absurd something this good - and popular - can sit unused.


James Hughes, Slate - "After this brief run, the company’s hope is that the opera will travel to other cities, other shores. The sets and simulacrums of natural beauty that fit so well in St. Paul will soon be broken down and cataloged, ready to be transferred to the next caretaker. "

Let's hope so. 

~
The Shining was composed by Paul Moravec with libretto by Mark Campbell, as performed by the Minnesota Opera as part of its New Works Initiative, premiering in May 2016. Directed by Eric Simonson.

7 comments:

  1. (1) I can (and do) understand King insisting that this opera be based on the novel and not the Kubrick movie. But then, in "Castle Rock," for which he is an executive producer, when the events of "The Shining" are mentioned, it's referred to as an attempted axe-murdering ... which is the movie's events, not the novel's. That inconsistency of approach makes no sense to me.

    (2) "But special credit to Mark Campbell; I don't think it's overstating it to say of the three attempts to translate the book into another medium (one of them by King himself) he might have done the book the most justice." -- If so, then it makes the obscurity of this opera even more frustrating than it already was.

    (3) "If you just listened to the music, you might be forgiven for thinking Danny (and Toby's) presence was too drastically reduced. But on the contrary, Danny is the pivotal on-stage role: it's just that as a child he can't carry the musical score so he has to be used strategically." -- Are significant singing roles in opera ever written for child performers? I don't know the medium well enough to be confident in saying this, but it seems like probably not. It certainly doesn't mesh with my idea of what opera is. Regardless, that's an interesting point -- Danny's relative absence from the music -- and I'm glad you mentioned it.

    (4) "it didn’t hurt that Straub, unlike King, is an opera buff" -- This makes perfect sense. Where my "Shadowland" opera at?

    (5) "Minnesota Opera could make a CD of the The Shining but not a DVD" -- Bad call. Even I, a know-nothing on the subject of opera, know that this is the sort of thing that really must be seen instead of merely heard. Merely hearing it will do if you've got no better option, but this is a visual medium. Depriving it of being seen is ... a bad call.

    (6) "Has he ever mentioned it in interviews? I found no answers to these questions." -- If he has, I am not aware of it. And I'd imagine that must be deeply frustrating to the people who made this opera. He's happy to promote mediocrity like Hulu's "Castle Rock" but can't be bothered to even mention an outside-the-box production like this opera? Seems like a shame to me.

    (7) "And opera houses across the country should put it on! It's absurd something this good - and popular - can sit unused." -- It kind of makes sense to me that the "Dolores Claiborne" opera has struggled to find new productions. It makes no sense in the case of "The Shining," especially given the reviews. You'd think any place that mounts operas would want to cash in on that payday.

    (8) I've heard this opera precisely once, via the stream that ran online for a brief time back in 2016. I enjoyed it quite a bit, and this despite my lack of familiarity with -- and resultant resistance to -- opera as a medium. So I figured I'd probably really enjoy seeing it, and would probably also grow to be even more appreciative of it on repeat listens. And that hasn't happened yet -- I've still only heard it once -- but I believe this October is going to find me revisiting it once or twice.

    Thanks for writing this! I feel like I have a better understanding of it now than I did before.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 1) "That inconsistency of approach makes no sense to me." Absolutely. It's a shame. Again, someone in King's camp should be more on top of stuff like this (consistency and adaptation-watch/patrol.)

      3) Not really. It's hard enough for a fully-developed voice to project over an orchestra for the traditional sort of opera role. I think at least 2 of my kids could make a go of it, volume-wise, but control/ technique wise, who knows. Anyway in the old days those roles would be played by a castrati (most famously in Mozart's "Marriage of Figaro"), but then they began casting women in those roles. I honestly don't know of any child-singer opera prodigies, but I'm sure there have been one or two. I can't think of any opera that has a huge role to be played by a child, though.

      4) I wish someone would adapt all King, all Straub, and all Moore into opera. There sure is a lot of opera written/ adapted from films, which makes sense - why not more from popular books?

      5) I don't know why King had that stipulation. Weird, isn't it?

      6) "He's happy to promote mediocrity like Hulu's "Castle Rock" but can't be bothered to even mention an outside-the-box production like this opera? Seems like a shame to me." My feelings, exactly. Again, I don't even blame him - hell, he's Stephen King, he's busy just being Stephen King - but someone in his camp should be on top of this, and I get actually angry that they aren't. It's like the shoddy editing of his work that King is always pointedly praising in afterwords and forewards; brother, if that's your idea of great editing/ great media-watch-ing/ adaptation-patrolling, you've been had.

      7) Exactly - it sold out every night. It would sell out elsewhere, as well. If only from a pecuniary standpoint, FFS, why is this just sitting out there, unused? Makes no damn sense. If the rental fees are too high, then... why? Whose decision is that? I wish there was an 800 number to call where I could answer these questions.

      8) You're absolutely welcome and thank you for bringing it all to my attention a few months back.

      Delete
    2. 3) That makes sense. And that means that the nature of opera inherently restricts the sort of stories that can be told via that medium. This is true of every medium, of course; but it's always interesting to me to notice a specific example of it I'd never been aware of before.

      6) It's probably at least partially what you suggest in the post: he knows nothing about opera and is basically not interested in it, so he figures it's a poor use of his time. Maybe he's even right about that. If it keeps him from writing even one short story, I probably vote for him skipping the promotion. I mean, I vote for the guy doing whatever he wants to do; he's earned it, and then some -- but not throwing his weight behind this opera at least a little bit smells to me like a big missed opportunity.

      7) 1-800-WTF-KING

      Delete
    3. (7) Ha! I'm sure I would get blocked from dialing that number if it was actually up.

      Delete
  2. Looks like a new production of this is happening:

    https://theknow.denverpost.com/2019/02/06/opera-colorado-the-shining-stephen-king-stanley-hotel/208265/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's good news. About time! That's a pretty solid season for the Denver Opera.

      Delete
    2. And another one, this time in Kansas City:

      https://www.kansascity.com/entertainment/arts-culture/article225576970.html

      This is likely due to the King boom in general, or possibly the impending release of "Doctor Sleep" -- or maybe the opera itself is developing a reputation?

      All I know is, the chances of me actually getting to see it in some capacity grow marginally greater every time it is staged, so bring 'em on.

      Delete