1.15.2018

Star Trek: Voyager (Season One)


Back when I was doing the Captain's Blogs, I did a few quick posts on Voyager that are fine for what they are, but I've always wanted to watch the show beginning to end and re-do the rankings I too-hastily-assembled five years ago. To that end I started watching the show on my lunch break last October and only yesterday * reached the end of season one. On this timetable, I should have some spiffy new rankings sometime around summer 2019. 

* Well, "yesterday" when I wrote this intro. Which was just about a month two months ago. Like Voyager, we bounce back and forth between past, present, and future!




Couple quick things:

- I consider the season six Voyager episode "Blink of an Eye" to be an A+. This may change over the course of the re-evaluation, but at the onset, this is my instrument calibration. (I decided not to put actual grades with each episode; rankings seemed enough.)

- While I prefer having all the cast/crew information in one place, gathering it all slows the pace of these posts considerably. Target Date Summer 2019 could too easily turn into summer 2029. (Heck, it still might.) I'll likely mention a lot of the info just the same. 
 
- I decided not to read any of the other overviews out there or buy the curiously overpriced Voyager Companion. Going to fly solo on this with no evidentiary support or research of any kind beyond whatever I half-ass google when typing up the post. I have a notion I'll end up with more or less the same favorite episodes, but I'm curious to see if watching them all in order will alter it any.

- All plot summaries from the show's wiki. My guess is you know the basic set-up and characters. My further guess is - like every Trek fan I've ever met - you have opinions as to why the show was never as successful as TNG and perhaps even why or how it never fully embraced its premise. Good! I am happy to have you here. Or maybe you're just casually familiar with Voyager; all good, too. Let us begin.



SEASON ONE


15. 


A member of the Haakonians, a race warring with the Talaxians, arrives on Voyager, much to the dismay of Neelix, whose family was killed by a weapon of mass destruction this particular individual devised.

Let's get this out of the way up front: I just can't with Neelix. The more I watch of the series, the worse I feel about this. Ethan Phillips gives it his all. The cast work well with him. The writers use him well (for the most part). And here in "Jetrel" both actor and character get several chances to shine. But man. This episode is probably pretty good; it's not them it's me. I'm not the guy to properly evaluate this - I just can't with this guy.


Trek vet Jason Sloyan as Jetrel.

14. 


Tuvok trains several Maquis members who have not fully integrated into the Voyager crew.

You know, it's perfectly valid to explore this sort of thing - and not just valid but a stated intention of the show - the whole Maquis vs. Federation conflict. But it's just not very interesting to me. I try to keep this first season in perspective with whatever else was going on over on DS9. I wasn't watching either show at the time, nor have I seen more than a season or two's worth of episodes, but it and Voyager were produced concurrently for most of the 90s. The episode of DS9 that aired the same week as "Learning Curve" was "Shakaar." Which (hey!) I've never seen. Anyway - maybe there was some interest to this whole dynamic for fans watching these episodes as they came out, I couldn't say, but for me it falls flat.


As does Tuvok's "Galileo Seven" storyline where he must both teach and learn from his recruits once things go from simulated to actual peril.

I'm not sure why "Learning Curve" was chosen to end the first season - someone who has the DVD probably knows for sure from either the featurettes or the commentary track - except perhaps it re-enforces one of the show's central premises: the isolation of the Delta Quadrant and the kind of engineering problems a starship might have without any starbases around. Unfortunately, though - and I hope unintentionally - it re-enforces another conceit of the series: a manufactured problem running through a set piece / countdown until solved by magical technobabble. 

Also, Tuvok says cultural ornamentation is anti-Starfleet?



At some point, someone doesn't give a circassian fig about something. I'll try and note these things as I go along. Then again, the internet probably has this well-mapped.


13. 


B'Elanna Torres is split into her human and Klingon halves by the Vidiians.

The Vidiians are introduced in "Phage," coming up a bit later. Alien species weren't really Voyager's forte. I'll see if this watch-through changes that opinion, of course - I'm keeping an open mind. The Vidiians - a doomed race of science-smart, ethics-indifferent space lepers who are hunting Voyager for their electrolyte-rich Alpha Quadrant bio-matter - are okay enough for recurring villains, I suppose. 



As for the episode itself, it has two Trek tropes in one: 1) B'Elanna struggling between her alien and human halves, and 2) some wonky magical science with implications that undermine the basic premise (namely why don't the Vidiians just cure themselves with all this magic science at their command?) Neither of these things are dealbreakers, just well-trodden ground.

12. 


Tom Paris is convicted of murder on an alien world, and his punishment is to witness the murder from the victim's perspective every 14 hours.

Directed by LeVar Burton. A Trek-trial episode, with perhaps too much in common with "A Matter of Perspective" (TNG) and "Court Martial" (TOS). Trek-court episodes are always a little off (see "Wolf in the Fold"), but they can be a lot of fun, to0 (see TNG's "Devil's Due" and "Wolf in the Fold" again.) This one not so much, though.



"Ex Post Facto" was the 8th episode of the show's 16-episode (15 if you count "Caretaker" as one, which I do) 1st season. Again, I wasn't watching at the time, but if I had been, would I have been puzzled by the lack of urgency the show had in distinguishing itself - and the Delta Quadrant - as its own endeavor? Probably. I think the show could have used a Star Blazers sort of tag at the beginning or end ("Hurry, Star Force! Planet Earth has only so-many-days left!") Ron Moore, one of Voyager's writers and later the co-creator of BSG, might have thought so, as BSG later utilized such a tag to great effect throughout its run. 
(He didn't join the Voyager staff until 1999, but hey, he still might have thought so!)


11. 


A shuttlecraft with Chakotay and Tuvok aboard is attacked; Chakotay is left brain-dead, while Tuvok begins acting strangely. An unknown force begins controlling crewmembers.

Here's more Delta Quadrant casserole of TNG ("Conundrum") and TOS ("Spock's Brain,") oddly enough one of two callbacks to "Spock's Brain" in Voyager's 1st season. It's perfectly fine but just a couple of things:

- The Doctor can put "consciousness" in and out of people? Okay. I can squint at this and make it work, I guess - it makes sense that Federation science would only grow from the days of "Return to Tomorrow" and "What Are Little Girls Made Of" and perhaps all of that ended up in The Doctor's program. Still, though.

- Kes is already being used as the Counselor Troi empathy-cypher, 11 episodes in. Speaking of Kes, I used to really dislike her. I can't really understand why now. Not only is she perfectly fine - if used a bit generically when in Troi-mode - she's a vital member of the cast. Kudos to Jennifer Lien.


Not the greatest taste in men.

- The music cues seem off in this one. Is it just me?

- First appearance of the Captain's holodeck program - playacting the governess of an English manor. Not the most exciting part of the show for me, but a subtle component of her character that I like. In general, I like what Voyager does with the holodeck.




10. 


Janeway and the other senior officers attempt to flush out a spy who is sending information to the Kazon.

I've mentioned my lack of interest in the Maquis, but I'm riveted compared to my interest in the Kazon, a group of Klingon-types introduced in the pilot who dog Voyager in hit and run attacks hoping to steal their technology.


Lt. Seska's defection from the crew to the Kazon and her big reveal re: her origins is fine. (At first.)
But these guys - just, no. Not only are they fourth-rate Klingons, their visual is ridiculous.

The technobabble is strong with this one: neosorium signatures, cytological diagnostics, pyrocite replacements, you name it. I do like the idea of a replicator malfunction leading to fatal subspace mayhem.

9. 


An organ-harvesting species known as the Vidiians steal Neelix's lungs, leaving him to die.

I'm torn between (Troy McClure voice) "They BURGLED Neelix's LUNGS!" and "The Talaxian's Lungs Are Missing..." for the tagline, so there's both of them.

Here's the other "Spock's Brain" pastiche (even an ion propulsion trail) except instead of Nimoy and groovy women with brain-and-pain machines who live underground, it's Neelix and... the Vidiians.


Progress... yay?

The Doctor refers to Neelix's lungs as too complex to replicate. Not like Klingon spinal cords, I guess! But okay. Talaxians are Delta Quadrant species, so hey. It opened the door for Neelix to be fitted with holo-lungs, so that's cool. The show doesn't know it yet, but it is its holo-imaginings that will be its legacy.


8. 


Voyager is trapped in a quantum singularity's event horizon, and Captain Janeway must decide between Lt. Carey and former Maquis B'Elanna Torres to be the new chief engineer.

I was just reading something about how black holes may not actually exist. They might, they might not. They're not something as quantifiable as stars or comets, etc. This isn't exactly news to me - I think I knew there was some uncertainty - but it made me think about discovering they didn't exist would terminate an entire era of sci-fi, much as discoveries of the moon (and Mars) brought definitive ends to earlier eras.



This isn't quite the story to hang such epoch-pondering thoughts upon, but it's a decent episode and a sensible 2nd episode of the series: re-enforcing the premise while getting the cast quickly into position so you know where to find them and what their job is during the big countdown-crisis inevitably on its way. This is a Torres episode, so this is about the girl who never felt at home anywhere in the Alpha Quadrant finding herself now that she's a gazillion light years from it. Not the most original arc, I grant you - most of Voyager's aren't, really, save the Doctor's, and perhaps Janeway's.

7. 


A race that could shorten Voyager's journey with a transportation device will not share its technology.

An interesting inversion of the whole prime directive dilemma in Trek. This has some nice moments in it, particularly with Tuvok and with Harry Kim. While we're here, the show really wants you to like Harry Kim. Which is pretty easy, actually - Garrett Wang is kind of effortlessly likeable and the more the other characters go out of their way to sing the character's praises, the more you say, hey! I like Harry Kim, too!


"Who, me?"
"Yes, me."
You need Harry Kim on that wall! Or down on the surface, romancing the ladies, as is the case here. 

This is actually a Janeway episode more than a Harry Kim one, but just some general praise for Harry "Bang Machine" Kim. Women want him, and men want to be him!


Sorry, Captain.

6. 

While searching for a missing Maquis ship with a Starfleet spy aboard, USS Voyager is swept away to the Delta Quadrant, more than 70,000 light-years from home, by an incredibly powerful being known as the Caretaker.

In January 1995 when this two-parter aired to kick off the series, I was working an ill-fated electrician's assistant job in Dawson, Georgia. I was trying to remember why I didn't watch this at the time, and I honestly don't remember. Which is odd - I have a strange obsession knack for remembering this type of thing. At any rate, I was not one of the 21 million people who tuned in. I only saw it for the first time 14 years later when Voyager became my go-to 3 am show during a mercifully brief bout of insomnia I had in 2009. (Incidentally, when I turned the corner on the show; prior to this I'd been pretty indifferent to Voyager. Insomnia will erode your resistance to just about anything.)

Anyway, this time around I enjoyed much more than I remembered. It's a solid piece of storytelling and sets up the show quite well. That Voyager almost immediately settles into an Alpha Quadrant of the Week approach should not be held against it. (Season 1 could definitely have used a few episodes like BSG's "33.") All in all, the Berman era of Trek did a more-than-decent job with its pilots for Deep Space Nine, Voyager, and Enterprise. Better, arguably, than "Encounter at Farpoint" did. That's not a comment on the quality of that story (which is perfectly fine and perhaps a bit underrated), just in how effectively it communicated what the series-to-come would actually be like/ about.

This raises a further question about whether the Berman Factory might have gotten their assembly line a little too perfect. Robert Beltran has certainly expressed that opinion over the years. But, we have plenty of time and no particular hurry.


5. 


Investigating a planet just devastated by a polaric explosion, Janeway and Paris are engulfed by a subspace fracture and transported in time to before the accident.

This episode must have been picked to be the third of the season to re-assure the audience that in spite of the crew being 70,000 light years from home, the audience could still count on the same kind of planet/ species/ episode of the week sort of Trek fun. With familiar faces in ridged-face make-up like Joel Polis. 


Olde Towne Tavern! Olde Towne Tavern! (Also Jerk Store.)

I'm torn on this aspect of the show. Was it just a matter of playing it safe? If so, can its lack of interest in rewriting the playbook (despite a premise that not only allows it but would seem to encourage it) or challenging the audience with new character dynamics be considered a failure? (I like the characters fine, but let's face it: there wasn't much going on, dynamics-wise, that didn't exist prior to Voyager in other Treks.) 

I guess what I'm getting at is that everytime I think "Here's the reason the show wasn't the success it could have been," I'm struck by a) the fact of the show's actual success (I don't know why I stubbornly persist in my delusion that seven seasons and finding a perennial streaming and download audience and new generations of fans, etc. does not equal success-any-way-you-define-it), and b) that if the point was to walk a specific line to re-assure the mid-90s Trek-viewing audience that the show would deliver a reliable product within established parameters, can I really hold that against the show? I might prefer it to have gone about itself a little differently, but it's like arguing with a Ferrari for not being a Cadillac. (Or something like that.)

Whatever the case, this isn't a bad one. 


If 70s Burger King and 70s Houston Astros joined forces for fashion.
Voyager had - for its time - the hands-down best special fx on TV. I'll find a better spot to discuss that in more detail, though.

This is two episodes in a row where Paris has to learn "effect" can precede "cause" in quantum mechanics / subspace microfractures. (Airdate-order, I mean, not in this countdown.) Also: first mention of The Delaney Sisters. We don't see them in "Time and Again" or for most of the times they're mentioned, but this is the first glimpse into Tom's (and Harry's, eventually) infatuation with Megan and Jenny.

4. 


The crew enter a nebula to collect samples before realizing it is a living organism, but not before injuring it.

Here's another fairly traditional Trek. I've taken to calling these episodes "Trek casseroles" in my notepad. (If I haven't mentioned that yet, it'll likely appear sooner or later and I'll have forgotten to footnote what it means. So here.) 


The nebula looks cool enough. A nice mix of old-and-new-Trek design.
Tom continues to corrupt Harry with his hedonistic holodeck ways. (First series appearance of Tom's Marseilles pool hall.)


3. 


Harry Kim is transported to an alien world at the same time as a dead woman's body arrives on Voyager.

I might be underrating this one. It's an interesting set-up (Voyager collides with one alien culture's death-and-afterlife belief system) and it's the kind of thing I like Trek to do: approach our cultural conditioning in an oblique but accessible sci-fi way.  It's a little uneven, but inoffensive. 




2. 


A micro-wormhole is discovered that leads to the Alpha Quadrant, and the crew make contact with a Romulan ship on the other side.

There are a few very cool things going on in this episode (having to compensate for the size differentials caused by the wormhole, the temporal tragedy of Telek R'mor, the Back to the Future II/III bit, are the ones I made note of,) But man - the whole hotshot pilot threads the starship through an impossible course, "threading the eye of the needle" is just so unexciting. Was it ever exciting, in any Trek, anywhere? Has anyone ever said "Man! Sulu piloted the shit out of the Enterprise in (that one episode)?" It's odd to me that they felt the need to have stuff like this in every incarnation of Trek.

But it was a different world in the mid-90s, and I'll try not to gripe about Trek-tropes. At least until the show gets to 2000. Why then? Because Galaxy Quest came out in 1999. (Not to mention Free Enterprise.) Let's use that as a dividing line of when Trekdom became a little too self-aware (for better or worse) to really get away with a certain range of things in an unironic way.



1. 


The holographic doctor must rescue crew members who were turned to light energy in a Holodeck simulation of Beowulf.

I haven't spent too much time on The Doctor in this post. He's a great part of every episode, for sure, but he shines particularly in this one, where he has to enter a holo-fantasy that has been co-opted by a strange life form. 


There's a little in common with "Emergence" (TNG) in this episode, which is an episode I personally love but many do not. So it goes. And I really like watching Picardo play The Doctor. It's definitely one of the entire franchise's best marriages of actor to role. 

The Doctor's search for a name is a running feature of the show. I think it'd have been great had he chosen Beowulf as a result of this episode, officially entered it, had doubts later and been ribbed about it here and there over the next 7 seasons. But hey.


~
As of this writing, I'm up to "Lifesigns" in season two. Hopefully this means we'll see a Season Two breakdown sooner rather than later.

Hope to see you then.

49 comments:

  1. Oooh, I gots LOTS to say about all of this!

    (1) I apologize if I have told you this story before, but it's germane. I can definitely tell you why I did not watch Voyager when it premiered: my town didn't have a UPN affiliate! I was heartbroken by this. Big Trekkie can't watch new Trek series. Unthinkable! A friend who lived in another town told me he would tape them -- on VHS, kids! -- and mail them to me, but he stopped following through on that almost immediately; I think I saw two or three episodes.

    (2) "Blink of an Eye" is absolutely an A+ Trek episode.

    (3) I feel your pain regarding Neelix. I think he might grow on you; he did on me, eventually. But he really is a tough pill to swallow, especially at the outset. Imagine how much tougher that pill might be if somebody less skilled than Ethan Phillips was under that hideous makeup!

    (4) I don't give shit one -- OR a circassian fig -- about the Maquis. Never did, never will. The entire Bajoran thing baffles me, even on TNG. I'm one episode away from being finished with a TNG rewatch; the penultimate episode is all about that plotline, and if it didn't have Michelle Forbes in it to perk me up a bit, I'd write it off almost totally. This explains why DS9 is handily my least favorite Trek series. Having the Maquis / Federation dynamic on Voyager is theoretically a good concept; but it never really amounts to much, as I recall.

    (5) I like the Vidiians pretty well. They are really gross, and if nothing else, they aren't really much like any other Trek villains we've seen before.

    (6) Stop me if you've heard this one before: Tom Paris REALLY should have just been the character RDM played on Next Gen. That he wasn't baffles me; that's a massive conceptual failure. And clearly, given the casting, that's what they wanted to go for!

    (7) I love Kes, and not just because Jennifer Lien was smoking hot. (A status she has very much not managed to maintain, sadly enough [said the objectifying cretin].) She's just a good character. The Troi comparison is apt; I like Troi a lot, too (a few horrid episodes excepted).

    (8) I remember liking Seska a lot, and her entire plotline. But it's been a decade since I watched any of this; I'm going on very few specifics.

    (9) The Kazon are one of the worst designs in Trek's history. Just stunningly awful. The way they are used is okay; boilerplate aggro baddies, but okay. That design, though ... boy, sci-fi tv of this era occasionally had some element that seemed designed to make fans look like irredeemable goobers in the eyes of non-fans.

    (10) If black holes are proven not to exist, you will hear my sigh of relief all the way from here. BUT THEY DO. In my heart, I know it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. (1) I can remember shenanigans like this! When I moved to Dayton in 1996 my sister would tape me "Simpsons" reruns and fill up VHS tapes, as we had no cable and our bunny ears picked up nothing. I was pretty much tv-less for a year and a half or so, but I had to have my "Simpsons" fix. Anyway, the tapes arrived pretty steadily, but each time she hit record on the new one it would roll back and erase the end of the last one. It got to be a game for me and Klum, anticipating when it was going to cut out. #VCRConfessions

      (6) I was always confused by that - they're so similar that it would make total sense. I wonder if whomever wrote the "First Duty" episode would have been owed an ongoing payment or something, had they done that? I should look up why they didn't just follow through with the obvious.

      (9) Agreed.

      (10) I'm sure there's worse things than that! Probably in our backyard. (Or in the walls...)

      Delete
    2. (1) Oh, yeah, I remember that rollback thing. You always had to record a bit extra to keep that from tainting all your archival tapes. Ay yi yi, I betcha that's why Netflix exists.

      (6) You might be onto something there. Avoiding paying royalties probably explains a lot of weird Hollywood decisions.

      (10) "The Black Hole In My Wall" -- *shudder*

      Delete
  2. (11) Never cared much for Harry Kim, sad to say. Probably my least favorite character on the series. Wang puts on a good convention panel, though.

    (12) I agree that "Caretaker" is a solid pilot. Most of the Trek pilots are, really. Among its virtues: from the get-go, I loved Janeway. Still do. For me, it's Kirk and then Picard and then Janeway, with everyone else well behind that triumvirate. Kate Mulgrew puts on a hell of a convention panel, too, by the way; maybe the best I've ever seen. She's magnetic.

    (13) Sidebar: I love "Encounter at Farpoint." Granted, I'm the guy who thinks the first two seasons of TNG are top-notch in concept (and occasionally, though certainly not always, in execution). I think it's just that the Roddenberrier an episode of Trek smells, the happier I generally am.

    (14) Regarding the relative non-success of Voyager, I'd say that it's almost entirely a matter of perception. As you say, it ran seven seasons, helped to launch a network, and is still watched today. It's not iconic in the way the TOS and TNG are, but few shows hit that level; that it was expected for Voyager (and DS9 and Enterprise and now Discovery) to do so is really more of a commentary on TOS and TNG than anything else.

    (15) "If 70s Burger King and 70s Houston Astros joined forces for fashion." -- Not only do I award you a LOL for that one, you got damn near to earning a ROFL.

    (16) Them Delaney sisters is A-OK in my book.

    (17) Great point about the heroic piloting in "Eye of the Needle." Trek -- especially this large second era of Trek -- has rarely managed to be exciting in the way much sci-fi can be. I always think it's a mistake to try, especially if you're going to fail; Trek just isn't built that way (mostly), so I'd prefer it stick to trying to excite in the ways it IS built to excite. Hotshot piloting is not one of them.

    (18) "Heroes and Demons," man. I got a story to tell about this one. Not much of one, but still, a story. As I mentioned earlier, I wasn't able to watch the show in real time. However, I just happened to be at my grandparents' house (which was in a market with a UPN affiliate) at the time this episode -- actually, a rerun of it, I'd guess -- aired. So I commandeered the television and my parents and grandparents and brother and me all watched this episode of Voyager. Nobody knew what to make of it, so I got a lot of side-eye from everyone the entire time. I think I may have given myself a bit of side-eye, too, because I had no idea what to make of it either. When I saw the episode again years later, though, I thought it was pretty excellent.

    And I love your idea about the Doctor temporarily naming himself Beowulf!

    (19) Oh, before I forget it: I also love the show's opening credits, which are handily the best in Trek's history. Jerry Goldsmith's theme music is awfully fine, as well; it curbstomps that boring DS9 theme.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. (12) That's my breakdown as well. Janeway was pretty cool.

      (13) Yeah it's pretty good! It aged well.

      (18) I love that story! I only wish there was a hardcore Doctor/ what's-her-name love scene to make it more uncomfortable.

      (19) Couldn't agree more on both counts.

      Delete
  3. 1. When it comes to Neelix, my reaction is always one of mixed detachment.

    Depending on the state of mind at the time, my basic reaction is either, oh, hi again, to, mmrph, you again!

    2. I find myself not minding Harry Kim one way or the other, really. I don't know i that puts me in the majority or not, to be honest.

    3. Here's what gets me about the Maquis. In terms of basic setup and execution, its pretty thin on the ground, and its quite easy for me to forget all about them.

    The one thing that really bugs me, however, is why do you name these characters after a WW2 French Resistance group? It just seems like muddying the waters to me (he wrote, knowing full well all his knowledge of the politics and ideology of the Resistance is limited to what he's seen on Hogan's Heroes).

    3. For me, the interesting part about Janeway is how many fans are starting to embrace this alternate character reading of her.

    Even Kate Mulgrew went on record as saying maybe her character has suffered some kind of private breakdown due to the stress of her situation, that's why she acts and makes the decisions she does. You have to admit, it does add a nice element of insanity to the proceedings.

    4. That Simpsons game sounds awesome, man.

    5. Farewell Black Holes, we...never really knew much about ye, one or another. Our word for today, boys and girls, is Paradigm Shift.

    ChrisC

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good to hear from you, Chris, glad to see you're in for some Voyager bloggin'!

      2) I really seem to like Harry (and Paris, for that matter) more than most.

      3) I know, that bugs me, too. Maybe the answer's in all those DS9 eps I never saw. But wouldn't there be some kind of Bajoran historical touchstone that would make more sense? Or non-Terran? (I guess the Maquis is mostly ex-Starfleet, is that the deal?) Either way: it's just not a dynamic I enjoyed very much. The problem with war in Trek is that they tend to approach it like WW2, with missions and set-piece battles, etc. But: it wouldn't be like that. Anyway, that's the sort of thing that yanks on the tapestry-thread of the Trek magic for me. "The occupation" has too much trigger/abuse potential for people; if you're gonna go there, make sure there's a Mugatu and Nancy Kovack (and crazy Kirk speeches); otherwise, no dice.

      3) I've never heard that! But I kind of like it. See, this is the thing with Voyager: would the show have been more interesting if Janeway had some kind of breakdown like this? Would it have been more interesting if instead of Alpha Quadrant plotlines they constantly pushed the envelope and got slightly David Lynch-ian with their alien encounters? (Weird flickering lights and strobes and ominous whooshing and darkness, etc.) To me, the answer is absolutely, and Voyager was the place to do this. But, like I say up there, then I feel like maybe I'm judging the show against what it might have been instead of dealing with what is there (and what it was designed to do), so it might be unfair. Still, it's aggravating, because I want to see that Voyager! Same characters and actors, just that set-up.

      I will definitely keep breakdown-Janeway in mind, though, that's great.

      Delete
  4. Inspired by this very blog post (and by finding the complete series on sale on Amazon for a marvelous price), I've started rewatching the series. At the risk of being tedious, I'm going to leave a few notes on my progress here.

    "Caretaker" --

    (1) I dig this pilot episode, more or less top to bottom. One thing I'd forgotten is how important Tom Paris is to it. He's damn near the main character! And the pilot works well in that capacity.

    (2) I'm not THAT big a fan of Quark, but I like his scene with Harry and Tom.

    (3) I may have stopped paying attention for a second and missed it, but was there ever a definitive explanation of what the weird growths on B'Elanna and Harry were? Failed Caretaker babies was the best I could come up with.

    (4) I still hate the design of the Kazon -- did these producers learn nothing from the Centauri on "Babylon 5"?!? -- but I have to admit, they are otherwise kind of alright. I really love that departing line the captain of their ship delivers about voyager having made an enemy today. Short, simple, ominous as fuck; that's the way to do it!

    (5) Jennifer Lien's wig may be the worst wig I have ever seen.

    (6) Why does the false environment created by the Caretaker appear as a mid-century American farm? Was this drawn from the mind of one of the crewmembers? I can live with it either way, but it's kind of weird that they didn't get more specific.

    (7) Yep, still love Janeway.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very cool - I look fwd to your revisit(s)!

      (3) If I noticed, I forgot.

      (5) Worse than Chekov's in "Catspaw?"

      (6) No idea. I can understand how it might require screen-time to bring the audience up to speed, but wouldn't it have been cool had we seen some kind of representation of 23rd (or 24th) century small-town-Americana deal?

      Delete
    2. (5) Oh! Good call. No, probably not. But equally bad. And it's still there through at least the first few episodes.

      (6) That would have made more sense in some ways. But I guess what they were going for was Bradburian weirdness, like "Mars Is Heaven!" It's also reminiscent of TZ's "Elegy" in some ways. So maybe that's the explanation; it's an attempt to place the series squarely within a certain kind of sci-fi tradition. As that, it works; there's just no in-universe explanation for why it's THAT, as opposed to the many, many other things it could have been.

      Delete
  5. "Parallax" --

    (1) I love it when Trek does weird-outer-space-shit episodes, and while I'm unsure that the science has any merit (not saying it doesn't, just saying I'm unsure either way), this one is an above-average example of that sort of thing.

    (2) I run hot and cold on B'Elanna. Her anger issues kind of irritate me, though that's a perfectly legitimate storyline for her; and her being a failed Starfleet cadet who is thrust into a Starfleet position without the benefit of all the training is a compelling idea, in theory. Can't remember whether the series makes much of it as the first season progresses.

    (3) It's kind of adorable how excited Janeway gets over B'Elanna's ideas. Do I recall correctly that Janeway has a background in engineering?

    (4) Chakotay has kind of popped for me during these first two episodes. Tuvok, as well. I remembered not thinking the series did all that well by them in the grand scheme of things, but I dig them both here.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. (1) and (2) me too

      (3) Not absolutely sure - I think so, though.

      (4) In general I really like Voyager's secondary cast (well, main cast but supporting cast I mean.)

      Delete
  6. "Time and Again" --

    (1) I chuckled through the entire episode thinking the Burger King Astros costumes. Although, to be honest, I kind of dig them; I'd wear one of those!

    (2) I don't want to go too deep into the woods here, but I'm king of intrigued by how my choice of watching this series again is impacting my perception of the episodes so far. So, as I may have mentioned before, I'm watching Trek along with the Mission Log podcast, who recently finished their run through TNG and have moved on the DS9. So I'm also watching DS9 as I'm watching Voyager, and though my pace on that is going to be a lot slower due to Mission Log only covering one episode per week (whereas I am liable to watch 3-4 of Voyager), I'm at a spot now where I've just watched the first three episodes of each. Comparing them, BOY is Voyager more my cup of tea in some ways; although I do like DS9 and am finding its different approach kind of refreshing. Which leads me to this...

    (3) If Voyager comes off as reassuringly stereotypical TNG-type Trek, I think it's almost certainly on purpose, so as to appeal to those Trekkies who may have found DS9 not to be their cup of tea. Since I just finished watching TNG in February, I'm kind of now seeing Voyager as a continuation of it, and it's totally working for me in that light. The concepts are KIND of rehashes, to some degree; but there is enough variation there that they don't feel like retreads, and the new characters/actors give everything a sprucing up. All of which is to say, I'm being reminded that THIS, this right here, is my kind of Star Trek.

    (4) You know, I'd forgotten this, but I'm a Tom Paris fan. He's a good spin on traditional Trek formula, and it helps make some of this stuff seem not as much of a rehash as it could have otherwise.

    (5) I dug the Prime Directive stuff here. Trying to figure out how that would apply in a scenario in which normal cause and effect had been upended is one that Federation lawyers would argue about for months on end. (And yes, I would watch that show.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. (5) Oh man! I'd watch the crap out of some STARFLEET LEGAL show. Takes place on a starbase/ hub and 90% of their workload is Prime Directive stuff. Hell to the yes! This is the kind of expanded Trek-verse stuff I'd loved to have seen in the 90s (or beyond).

      (4) It's a good crew, for sure.

      (2) - (3) You're probably right, there, on the intent. I use the term "Trek casserole" a lot, and I need to stop, because I'm sick of reading it from myself, but yeah, alot of VOY eps are creative-re-heats-of-leftovers, etc. Nothing wrong with that, but there are times where you want to have a word with the cook or buy him/her some new groceries.

      Delete
    2. (2)-(3) Oh, no, I don't think you're at all wrong to be pointing that stuff out. I can remember that being one of the objections contemporary viewers had, not only to "Voyager" but to "Enterprise" later on.

      I look at it (and I'm sure I've said this elsewhere) a bit like jazz; I don't mind that everyone plays the same tune, since it's the solos that interest me, and the tonality of the instrument.

      So while I've/we've seen a lot of what this episode does on numerous prior occasions, I also quite enjoy it because I've never seen the way Kate Mulgrew as Janeway reacts to this sort of Prime Directive quandary. (Well, I've seen the whole series, so I actually HAVE seen it -- but you know what I mean.) She sells it all really, really well, which is all I need to enjoy it, to be honest.

      Delete
  7. "Phage" --

    (1) I like this one more than you do, possibly due only to the fact that I don't want to run screaming every time Neelix shows up.

    (2) Another great perils-of-command scene with Janeway toward the end, when she basically doesn't even consider killing the one Vidian in order to get Neelix's lungs back. THAT'S the ethics I want from Star Trek; the idea that even when things are at their worst, there's a core set of values that these people simply will not cross. And BOY is Mulgrew great in that scene; when she tells the Vidians that if they ever threaten her crew again, she will exact a very high price indeed, I 100% believe it.

    (3) The Vidians are so gross that I have a hard time looking at them. But I love the fact that they end up helping Neelix; these really aren't complete monsters. As a result, they are interesting.

    (4) Jennifer Lien has some great moments in this episode, too, and Robert Picardo too.

    (5) The holo-generated lungs thing is kind of genius. This is the sort of question that anyone watching TNG was bound to have asked once they figured out that for all intents and purposes, holo-generated matter is real while it's being generated. Along those lines (and apologies in advance)...

    (6) If you ate a holographic hot dog, could you stay in the holodeck long enough to have to poop it out? If you did and then ended the program, would the poop vanish? If you decided NOT to poop it out and waited until you REALLY had to go, and ended the program, would you suddenly not have to go anymore?

    (7) Could Barclay have gotten holographic Troi pregnant if the program was allowed to run long enough? If so, would she give "birth"? If the program was sustained indefinitely, would the "child" grow up?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. (6) - (7) - In the same way I'd watch STARFLEET LEGAL, I'd watch a show where a grumpy Robert Picardo has to play HOUSE M.D. to solve a mysterious range of alien pathogens, as well as answer these sort of medical implications with 24th century tech.

      Delete
    2. CBS needs to hire us both as developers. Lord, the amount of Trek money we could make them...!

      Delete
    3. I goddamn agree. It's almost pathological how badly they fail to capitalize. And I don't mean in a strip-mine/ over-merchandise the franchise way, I just mean in developing product that's almost no-brainer-ish in its appeal.

      Delete
    4. I'd be curious to know if you enjoyed this episode more with the kindlier disposition to Neelix that developed over the run of the series.

      Delete
    5. I'll keep an eye out for all once-I-hated-them Neelix episodes when I get round to watching VOY again.

      Delete
  8. "The Cloud" --

    (1) I like this episode a lot. The cast is really gelling as a unit here, and I like the way everyone is used in this episode. (Although Neelix is awfully Neelixy at times...)

    (2) I'm also generally a sucker for Trek episodes in which there's no bad guy; there are so few of them, relatively speaking.

    (3) I do have two problems with the episode, though.

    For one, I have to ask, how is the ship struggling with its energy reserves but still able to run a holodeck program just to let everyone play pool in fake France? Maybe this is one of those things where the science makes sense and I don't understand it. Or maybe they didn't adequately address that issue. Or maybe -- and just hear me out here -- it's hogwash! Personally, I'm going with hogwash.

    (4) Second problem: for understandable reasons, the episode isn't quite able to convey just how awesome a thing a lifeform 6 (7?) AU in diameter would be. That would be the most astonishing discovery Starfleet had ever made. Personally, if I were a Starfleet captain and stumbled across something like this, I would consider it my duty to stop everything I was doing -- up to and including attempting to get back to Earth -- and devote a big chunk of time to a scientific study of this thing.

    I get why that doesn't happen, of course; it's not a thing that I actually have a problem with, it's just a perils-of-episodic-television thing.

    (5) I'd have flipped out if Harry Kim or somebody had said, "Six AUs...! That's _____ times the size of V'Ger!" And then somebody else, probably Tuvok, could have said, "Yes, Mr. Kim, this ship was named for that life-form."

    (6) The spirit-animal thing is a little clunky; I'm not sure the native-American aspect of Chakotay ever worked. However, I really like Janeway's fascination with (and immediate embracing of) it here. It's consistent with her efforts throughout the episode to open up to her crew, but it's also reflective of the natural tendency of a Starfleet-type explorer: to seek out the new.

    (7) The whole arc of the episode is Janeway's attempt to shift gears in demeanor, and this is kind of interesting to me personally given that I'm seeing this is very close relative proximity to "All Good Things..." and that wonderful scene of Picard joining his crew for a game of poker.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "Eye of the Needle" --

    (1) I love this episode. I'd forgotten about it, but as it began I remembered it as being one of the season-one standouts. I wasn't wrong.

    (2) Not only is this a great villain-free episode, but we even get a sympathetic -- and interesting -- Romulan! Even TNG could never crack the Romulans, with maybe an episode or two excepted.

    (3) I know why you have this one ranked so highly. Zero Neelix. Lots of Kes, though, and she's good. They've gotten her a better wig, finally, and have realized that with a voice like that, she should speak frequently.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. (2) It really is freaking bizarre how erratically the Romulans have been used. I agree this one is a high point for their franchise representation. Why is it so hard anyway? I don't get it.

      Delete
  10. "Ex Post Facto" --

    That's a good call about on "A Matter of Perspective" and "Court Martial." I definitely found myself thinking of the former, which this may as well have been a remake of. But there was just enough in it to distinguish it that I am okay with the similarity. For example, I thought the bad-guy plot was kind of interesting. Only on a sci-fi show can you do some stuff like that.

    What is the deal with the aliens on the planet? Are those things on their heads decorative or part of their bodies? If part of their bodies, are they supposed to be evolved from chickens or something? Are these the Hawkmen from Flash Gordon? Very offputting design; that's the sort of thing that, if I were watching an episode and somebody cool walked in, I'd stumble all over myself trying to turn the television off so they didn't judge me. But it'd be too damn late.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know that feeling/ mad scramble for the remote. All too well...

      Delete
  11. "Emanations" --

    (1) Another terrific episode. I knew I liked "Voyager," but I'm not sure I knew I loved it. So far on this rewatch, though, loving it.

    (2) I thought all the dynamics at the beginning involving Chakotay and Kim being on opposite sides of the argument as regards not disturbing the resting place of the dead bodies was great. Both men have valid viewpoints, but it's more the way of Starfleet to err on the side of caution with such things. But Harry doesn't get all butthurt about it, he thanks Chakotay for letting him give his opinion to the Captain. And THEN, when the shit hits the fan, Chakotay doesn't stand (pun intended) on ceremony, he does what he knows has to be done. Great crew dynamics.

    (3) The plight of the handicapped guy who just found out the afterlife is a crock of shit is pretty damn compelling. The woman with a brain tumor, too. The hats that race wears are kind of silly, but I guess that's just the one guy; and given what silly hats some humans wear, I guess I'll allow it.

    (4) If I were more cynical -- or if I were Bill Maher -- I might complain about the fact that the episode feels the need to say "But the afterlife really MIGHT exist after all!" I'm not, though, so I won't; that aspect works just fine for me, because it reaffirms the scientific method, rather than refuting it. "Hey, we don't really know for sure, plus there's some evidence that kind of hints at it being possible." Great! That's Star Trek, alright.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. (4) It's strange with atheists like Bill Maher because unless you have some kind of religious faith in the absence of God, you just basically have a competing belief system, not some superior "all is nothing" system. But, if you have religious faith... (i.e. "there is NO WAY that ANYONE knows, but I believe it anywat") how are you actually an atheist? Best you are is an agnostic. Or a hypocrite. Don't get me wrong - religious people probably outnumber atheists in hypocrisy 100 to 1, but I just think it's much more sensible and thousands of degrees less arrogant to have the Trek attitude, i.e. "whatever people believe might simply be the result of science we don't understand yet, so why bother arguing/ attacking it?"

      This makes me a wishy-washy Christian, I guess, or at least a "universal humanist" one, but I cast the same skeptical and somewhat exasperated eye on jihadists (of any stripe.) Sometimes you have to take leaps of faith/ make the best judgment call you can. That's just being alive/ pursuit of happiness.

      Anyway, so says me.

      I like this one a lot, too, and I hear you: VOY is very lovable.

      Delete
    2. I consider myself an atheist, but I am not a hardliner about it. Seems like a lot of work, and also like a sure-fire recipe for being a dickhole.

      Delete
    3. I'm rarely able to convey the normalization / absurdity of the fundamentalist-atheist. But - like the antiracist people who are somehow incredibly racist - such things no longer surprise me. Unless you're mindful not to be doing it, and I'd argue things are set up to default people into the least amount of mindfulness possible, you (i.e. the royal you/ i.e. all of us) become attached to what you attach, and then the attach defines you.

      Anyway, I've always loved the Trek approach.

      Delete
    4. * attached to what you ATTACK

      Delete
    5. "Attached to What You Attack" would make a good title for something. It's also true, of course, in which case I am very attached to both "Spectre" and "Star Trek: Discovery." But I'm okay with that; both of those things need to be attacked.

      Speaking of things like this, earlier this week I overheard a person utter the proclamation "I don't need any art from any disgusting man" and while I guess I understand how one arrives at a stance like that, I don't think that makes it any less lamentable.

      It'd be nice to think that at some point maybe we'd give NOT being crazy a shot. I'm not going to hold my breath waiting on it to happen, though, and in the meantime I guess I can just rewatch old sci-fi shows. It's working for me currently, at least.

      Delete
  12. "State of Flux" --

    (1) Another winner, in my book. I really like the way the plotline makes use of the fundamental insanity of the Federation and Maquis crews having been mixed together. On the one hand, it's hard to blame Janeway (or Chakotay) for having decided to go that route. After all, they are all intelligent adults whose sense of duty to their own crews would make it impossible not to realize that their best shot at surviving is to work together. But on the other hand, it's not at all difficult to understand how one of the Maquis would be unscrupulous enough to not really care that much about Federation principles. This is especially logical for one of them who had never been in the Federation at all. For me, that all just works.

    (2) Still finding it damn near impossible to invest in the Kazon on a visual level. But I kind of liked the commander of the ship that showed up mid-episode. He's got an arrogance and a coldness that helps make the Kazon seem not entirely like the Klingon ripoffs they otherwise seem to be.

    (3) There's a great little beat where Janeway asks B'Elanna how long it will take her to tech some tech, and B'Elanna says it'll be the next day. Janeway says "you've got five minutes" or something pushy, like all Starfleet captains do; B'Elenna immediately shuts her down and says, essentially, "Uh, bitch, I gave you an accurate estimate the first time; don't pretend I can work miracles, and I won't try to fool you into thinking I can." Janeway is clearly charmed by the honesty, and backs down; in the background, Chakotay is grinning, proud of his Maquis engineer having proven her worth yet again. Then, later, B'Elanna is able to deliver her plan flawlessly. All too often, on shows like this, drama is derived from things goign wrong; here, it is sheer competence that provides these little dramatic beats. I love it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. (1) The Maquis make no damn sense. I hate the drama. But you're right with what you say.

      (2) Ditto here. (Kazon bad, Bryant-insight good).

      (3) I remember that one and chuckled at it. I'm kind of an anti-B'Elanna phase now, so I wonder if the line had been delivered, say, in these end of season 3 episodes I'm stuck on right now, if it had annoyed me? Probably.

      Delete
  13. "Heroes and Demons" --

    Excellent episode, although part of me feels that this was about as far as the Holodeck-runs-amok thing could possibly be taken. (I can't remember how that plays out in the remainder of the series; I know there are plenty more holodeck episodes to come, though.)

    I love The Doctor, because what's not to love. But part of me wishes they HAD given him a true name at some point. When one says "The Doctor" in a sci-fi context, that really ought only to refer to "Doctor Who." That's a matter for warring factions to sort out Anchorman-style at Comic Con, though, I guess.

    When I think about THIS The Doctor, what I often end up thinking is about how I personally don't really believe such a being a possible. But I also believe that about Data. I just don't think true artificial intelligence is a thing. Or, if it IS a thing, I think it would quickly turn into something very alien and unrelatable. Now THAT, I'll buy.

    And I can believe in it within the realm of science fiction, though, especially within the context of Trek. The introduction of the holodeck in season one of TNG -- although it's in the animated series, if you want to get REALLY technical about it -- set a ball rolling that could only eventually reach this sort of conclusion: that from a hologram a "real" person could and would eventually be created. They kind of HAD to go there, and I'd say they did it pretty well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good stuff here. I hear you about that The Doctor/ Doctor Who conundrum. I hadn't thought of that, but it's very true.

      I think VOY's use of holo/photon-contemplating is overall praiseworthy - and may even be the defining feature of the show, though I'm curious if I'll think that after absorbing all 7 seasons - but I share the same "surely this has to be it for the holodeck stories, right?" Not even that I'm bored with them, I'm not - just yeah, something about the concept makes you think, ok, what else, now? And yet: the best holodeck episodes are indeed to come.

      It's an interesting question, because I like the idea of the holodeck becoming weirdly important to the crew the more time they spend in the Delta Quadrant, and I like some of the ways the later episodes explore this (with "Fairhaven" and what not - a lot of people hate those episodes, but not me; good Janeway stuff, there, along with everyone else) but in the same way you mention with A.I., it's just difficult to truly project into the future with some of these technologies, and what you end up with are nowadays-stories just projected unto the holodeck conceit.

      Unavoidable, though. Still! Again here I wonder if BSG really was an anti-VOY in some ways, or not opposed against it, but pointedly exploring these things.

      I'm becoming a broken record on that one, I think. Maybe I'm just trying to talk myself into watching BSG again.

      Delete
    2. I remember liking those Fairhaven episodes, too. I couldn't tell you a thing about them other than that, since I only saw them once; but I liked them and was surprise to find out they were rather reviled among Trekkies.

      I think that if there is ever a Next-Next Generation Trek series -- and there had damn well better be -- then it needs to really take the holodeck thing and run with it. I don't what I mean by that, exactly, but I'm not a paid science fiction writer. Or even an unpaid one, for that matter.

      One idea: I think the Federation might combine holdeck technology with that invisible duck-blind technology from Insurrection AND with the time-travel capability the Federation deep state clearly possesses. They'd have teams of historio-anthropologists who were in charge of going back to key moments in history and recording them in holodeck-level details so that they could be studied for posterity. Quite possibly this could be accomplished by cloaked drones, although what fun is that from a storytelling perspective?

      As for BSG ... I am using Mission Log as an excuse to rewatch both DS9 and Babylon 5 (in tandem). And I got so nostalgic for the DS9-era Trek as a result of THAT that here I am, watching Voyager at a more accelerated rate, just 'cause.

      When I'm done with that, I think I'll launch myself into an Enterprise rewatch, and since that and BSG were contemporaries of a sort, I may those as a side-by-side-comparison project of some sort.

      So many ideas!

      Delete
    3. Oh, and to the point: I suspect Battlestar might have begun as a sort of anti-Voyager (or an anti-Trek in general), but I don't think it necessarily stayed that way. It turned into its own thing pretty quickly, whether the folks who made wanted it to or not or never even gave it a moment's consideration.

      Oh...! And I need to find a way to fit Farscape into all of this somehow. Ay yi yi.

      Delete
  14. "Cathexis" --

    (1) This one is okay, but it's a significant step down from much of the rest of the season. I guess I'm glad it doesn't go full-blown "Spock's Brain" crazy, but that might have pepped it up a bit.

    (2) I didn't notice any weirdness with the music cues, but that doesn't mean it's not there.

    (3) That consciousness-restoration thing is ridiculous. But, like you, I'll allow it. The Doctor makes some crack about basically having first put it on what amounts to a really big external hard drive. Okay, sure. Why not?

    ReplyDelete
  15. "Faces" --

    (1) I probably liked this one a little more than you did. It's basically just a riff on "The Enemy Within" (and not the last one Voyager will do), but I'm okay with that. The differences in characters give it enough of a freshness to make it viable.

    (2) You make a good point about how the Vidiians really ought to be able to cure themselves if they can, like, suck all the Klingon DNA out of a person and then turn it into a new person. I can more or less forgive it; Trek asks me to provide larger buy-ins regularly. (WHY DOES EVERYONE EVERYWHERE JUST SPEAK ENGLISH?!?) But it is indeed loopy.

    (3) Even loopier, for me: the Doctor just squirts more Klingon DNA into B'Elanna so she will be good and mixed again next week! This, to me, is just as crazy as the whole Uhura-getting0her-memory-wiped thing from TOS. But, again, I guess I can roll with it.

    (4) Hey, I like B'Elanna in this episode! BOTH of her! How about that? Roxann Dawson is kind of great here, actually, especially as the full-human her. Less so as the full-Klingon her; she, like actors before her, struggles mightily with talking through the dental appliances that are (and shouldn't be -- there's no honor in having shitty teeth) part of the Klingon makeup.

    (5) That shit with the Vidiian doctor suddenly having the face of one of the Starfleet crew is nightmare fuel. Gah! Very well done.

    (6) How thrilled were you to see another Talaxian? I kind of was, weirdly.

    (7) The opening scene in which Neelix is feeding Tuvok "plomeek soup" is kind of delightful. Tim Russ is arguably showing a bit too much annoyance, but I'll let it pass; Neelix IS incredibly annoying, so maybe Tuvok just can't.

    (8) Why didn't Voyager send down an away team to rescue the other prisoners? Prime Directive, maybe, but that's horseshit. Save those poor fuckers!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your enthusiasm for this one makes me want to line it up again! That isn't good for my finishing this project... and yet it IS good. Lawgivers!

      (2) Th English/ Humanoid-lifeform/ parallel-development thing is indeed problematic. Like you say the best way is just to shrug it off and make with the make-believe, but sometimes... gaaaa.

      (4) Klingons mouths are all canine teeth, I think. You've got to kind of love stuff like that - they evolved to do nothing but rend flesh with their mouths. We have a measly couple of canines on Sol 3...

      (7) Hear, hear!

      (8) That's extra rations for Harry Kim!

      Delete
  16. "Jetrel" --

    (1) Oh, I dig this one. I have a higher tolerance for Neelix than you do, which helps massively. Here, I think the idea is to show that what we think of as "Neelix" is a carefully-constructed facade, masking this huge reservoir of anguish. This is not to say that the more gregarious and light-hearted aspects of the character are false; but I think he's artificially amping them up so as to keep his mind off the events described here.

    And I gotta say, Ethan Phillps is terrific in this one.

    (2) James Sloyan is every bit as good as Dr. Jetrel. I'm not a big fan of the makeup used for whatever race he is a member of; but Sloyan makes it work.

    (3) I'm not sure the is-science-moral/should-it-be aspect comes off AS well as it might have, but I think it's a valiant effort at worst.

    (4) This is a good example of the series taking advantage of the conceits which are particular to it. The whole thing only works if transporter technology is unknown to the races who are involved; so it couldn't have been done on TNG unless the role of Neelix was filled out by a guest star; and then, it loses a lot of its impact. DS9 could get closer thanks to the wormhole, but it's still got the same problem. So good on ya, Voyager! This was an example of you being quintessentially you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. See, you're approaching this fairly, i.e. "Hmm, Neelix is annoying, but this is well written and shows depth, etc." Whereas I'm more like "Neelix? No thank you. Next." So, of the two of us, YOU should be doing these, not me! Nevertheless, I am going to try and stick out the rest of the series, Neelix or no.

      Delete
    2. I'm guessing a lot of people had that reaction to Neelix over the years. My memory of it is that he never really gets any better, either. Although, as I say, I can kind of live with him, and even enjoy him from time to time.

      Delete
  17. "Learning Curve" --

    (1) What an odd season finale! By which I mean, it's really NOT a season finale. I wonder if there was a reason for this.

    (2) That "circassian fig" moment is horrendous. I kind of get why shows like trek do this sort of thing, but if I were ever to be put in charge of one, I'd like to think I'd keep it to an absolute minimum.

    (3) All that said, I dug this episode. It's probably the best use of Tuvok during the first season, and, for a small wonder, I actually DID find myself responding to the Maquis/Starfleet divide. I'm still not sure I care about the Maquis in the grand scheme of things, but rewatching this first season made me more invested in it than I'd ever been before.

    (4) The Janeway-as-governess thing at the beginning is weird, but I like it, too. That's little Thomas Dekker playing Little Lord Fauntleroy or whoever. It's years before he'll star in "The Sarah Connor Chronicles," but only about a month after he starred in John Carpenter's "Village of the Damned." He's good here.

    (5) I love the shots of the crew turning into sweaty, disgusting messes while the environmental controls are raised to the limits. Meanwhile, The Doctor is happy as a clam. Good use of Picardo, as is usually the case.

    (6) Hey! Another Neelix/Tuvok scene I enjoyed! Neelix advising Tuvok that it's HE who needs to learn to bend is pretty good stuff.

    (7) I also enjoyed seeing Chakotay just cold-cock that one dude who was getting lippy. Beltran isn't used as well as he might have been for much of the season, but he has his moments, and this is one of them.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Stuff I learned from the DVD bonus features:

    (1) I already knew about this, but it's worth mentioning: another actress (Genevieve Bujold) originally got the part of Captain Janeway and filmed for a couple of days. You can see several minutes of this footage on the DVDs, and BOY is she awful. Zero charisma. Kate Mulgrew is not everyone's cup of tea; she's mine (and how!), but not everyone's. I can't imagine Bujold being anyone's cup of tea. There is mention of other actresses being under consideration besides Mulgrew when time came to replace Bujold; none of them are mentioned by name on the DVD, but a bit of research turns up (among others) the names Joanna Cassidy, Lindsay Crouse, Blythe Danner, Patty Duke, Susan Gibney (Dr. Leah Brahms!), Erin Gray, Linda Hamilton (!), Kate Jackson, Tracy Scoggins (later Captain Lochley on the final season of Babylon 5), Helen Shaver, and Lindsay Wagner. Some solid names there; but I think they hit a home run with Mulgrew, personally.

    (2) ...and that's about all, really. There is ZERO mention of how/why "Learning Curve" came to be used as a season finale. I did a little digging on Wikipedia, and discovered that there were actually four additional episodes filmed during the first season that were not broadcast until the second season. These were "Projections," "Elogium," "Twisted," and "The '37s," the latter of which was originally intended to be the season finale.

    Apparently, the decision was made to hold these episodes over to the second season so as to give UPN an opportunity to beat the other networks out of the starting gate with the 1995 fall season.

    "The '37s" was chosen to open the second season because the dynamic visual of the ship landing on the planet (as well as the high-concept appearance of Amelia Earhart) would presumably serve as a memorable season opener.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. (1) Man, some of those choices (Patty Duke!) are wild. I'm with you, though; Janeway IS Mulgrew.

      Bujold is, on paper, a sensible choice; I can definitely see the "hey what about Kate Mulgrew" thinking if Bujold is the starting point; there are some similarities between the two. But, I'm glad it didn't work out. (I haven't seen DEAD RINGERS in a good 20 years; I should probably throw that on one of these nights.)

      (2) How disappointing. Again, they should've asked us what to include!

      I'm really dragging my feet on finishing s3. I was watching VOYAGER at lunch for a good few months and slowly-but-surely advancing. But with the arrival of the new lifeform and Dawn home on maternity leave, it's become somewhat problematic do so at lunch. And I've got a whole different routine at night. So: I've been stuck on the same episode ("Unity") for just about 6 weeks. I hate when momentum comes to a halt. The activation energy required to jumpstart it is difficult to generate.

      Delete
  19. What the hey...?!? Apparently I didn't leave a comment on "Prime Factors"! Good episode -- lots of strong moments for multiple characters, and it's the relatively rare instance of the series leaning into the Starfleet/Maquis divide among the crew and finding something useful in there.

    It's also the relatively rare instance of a Trek episode acknowledging and getting great mileage out of the idea that Vulcan logic need not always be a positive thing. It turns Tuvok into a rather duplicitous fellow here; a conspiratorial one, at that. Very compelling subplot.

    And yeah, a pretty good showcase for young Harry Kim! Sadly, I think he got too wrapped up in the excitement of using the technology to smash one out, but hey, at least the opportunity was there; one hopes it will serve him better in his next opportunity with a Delaney.

    ReplyDelete